You’re denigrating trash by comparing it to st kildaAnd Saints lost to the bombers lol. They are a lower level of trash id imagine
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You’re denigrating trash by comparing it to st kildaAnd Saints lost to the bombers lol. They are a lower level of trash id imagine
4 - 0
Were the free kicks there?The melts - but no one will mention that Freo scored six goals from free kicks right in front
I reckon controlling umpire might get the call in that situation?? Not sure what the rule is on that.Was watching without sound (much better) so unsure if this happened myself, but if you have one umpire say it's touched and another say it isn't, surely it should be a ball-up?
What are you talking about? It WAS a great finish to a great game.This was threatening to be a great finish to a close game. Fortunately, the umpires sensed this and decided to insert themselves as the deciders.
I agree NeoDoesn’t matter anyway, we live in a simulation …. Everything is out of our control and meaningless
That is why the umpires cheat week in and week out. The completion is corrupt.Victorians think they're better than us. They know they can't compete with us on an even playing field.
Maybe you just aren't good enough ?How do we lose to this umpire assisted rabble so often?
Given recent history we're pretty good at locking up games in the dying stages.Yep with 40+ seconds left
I agree it's undisciplined but the umpire needs to understand that there's a fair chance that it actually was touched and that's why the freo players were angry. He's not going to reverse his call obviously but allow them to blow off steam. after all, the Cottrell decision decided the match. he didn't need to put a nail in the coffin with a call like that. He should be stood down for a while I reckon.Was a pretty tough call for the umps to see on the original touch. A slight deflection off the shoulder. Sure, it WAS touched, but you have to play to the whistle.
It was called a mark and the goal was kicked. Thems the breaks. They still had a chance from there. They'd dominated clearances and were a good chance to get it out again.
We didn't make the Freo players complain well after the fact. I'm sure they were warned before the initial free was paid in the middle of the ground.
I'm sure they were warned again before the second free that resulted in the 50.
Sucky way to lose a game, but VERY undisciplined.
Were the free kicks there?
I'm inclined to agree, but players also need to learn to shut their mouths and not abuse someone just because they're annoyedpoor little precious princess umpire heard a naughty word, it hurt his feelings. to potentially decide a game right at the end over such a minor thing, grow a pair and understand abit of context about the game and that its not about you and your fragile feelings and inflated ego
Maybe nobody can smell what we’re cooking?Maybe you just aren't good enough ?
Exactly. They shouldn’t have been yapping to the ump so much with the game on the line. Once it’s obvious the decision won’t be overturned despite pleading your case, then just get on with it.Say what you like about the mark but your just lost your team the game by carrying on like a pork chop when the game still has a kick in it and 40 seconds to go
omg…..is that you’re argument?!???6 of 9 Freo goals from free kicks.
Let’s take away all free kick goals, we thump them.
People don’t like seeing the better team win when it’s the Blues.
From memory, most were fair free kicks. If you get bumped and don’t dispose of it properly, it’s still dropping the ball.You got one all but directly in front when Acres was bumped and not tackled. And the other when Kemp didn’t have the ball for about 4 seconds.
If you couldn’t get it done today you won’t get it done for a while. Won the free kick count against a side who hardly showed up. No point complaining about the umpires.
Theres a number of assumptions in there.Was a pretty tough call for the umps to see on the original touch. A slight deflection off the shoulder. Sure, it WAS touched, but you have to play to the whistle.
It was called a mark and the goal was kicked. Thems the breaks. They still had a chance from there. They'd dominated clearances and were a good chance to get it out again.
We didn't make the Freo players complain well after the fact. I'm sure they were warned before the initial free was paid in the middle of the ground.
I'm sure they were warned again before the second free that resulted in the 50.
Sucky way to lose a game, but VERY undisciplined.
That's the disappointing thing, we won't know who the better team was. Because the last 2 goals were gifted in a space of 30 seconds. A really disappointing watch as a neutral.Maybe you just aren't good enough ?
Yes. We. I am a Carlton member and supporter, so I am a part of the club.We? LOL
Unless you were playing today you really mean “they”. Sit down.
How do we lose to this umpire assisted rabble so often?
Yep with 40+ seconds left