- Banned
- #226
Some real cringe efforts in here from people who obviously can't tell what a joke is when it's staring them in the face
The richest person in the world shit posts on Twitter all the time. People can’t take a gag
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some real cringe efforts in here from people who obviously can't tell what a joke is when it's staring them in the face
Some real cringe efforts in here from people who obviously can't tell what a joke is when it's staring them in the face
Funny watching usual ignorant, thoroughly hypocritical clowns not fussed about Steph absolutely lying about her father 'creating and founding' the WWE in a promo on prime time free to air national TV but having a stupid moan about a joke tweet from TK.Funny watching people get offended over TK tweets.
Obviously a joke, but it is still cringe.
Just let it go man...... and funnily enough even if Brock did walk out at the start he came back and showed up....
Yeah im a cm punk fan. But damn move on. If Bret Hart can move on from the screwjob he should be able to.I see Punk still has that massive chip on his shoulder.
Said a lot in that statement for someone who hasn't been there for years, and wasn't there either of the nights he talked about.
His attacks on WWE have been boring for a while, now they're just sad.
The key difference was Brock come back and did the business and the difference is Punk is a great wrestler who looks like a bum ( I am a fan of him)
Brock is a mega star who draws.
Your world champions….
In the end Brock showed up whereas punks argument of Banks Naomi and himself is irrelevant and comes across as completely bitter.Simple exercise though. Compare both guys high profile matches against the same opponent.
Punk vs Undertaker (WM 29)
Punk vs Lesnar (Summerslam)
Reigns vs Undertaker (WM 33)
Reigns vs Lesnar (One of the 40000 times)
If you are a 'casual' fan who saw these high profile matches you wouldn't give a toss about the public image of the two men. You'd simply recognise Punk as being the better wrestler of the two world champions. Does that extend to 7 year old Jimmy who thinks winning is everything in wrestling? Perhaps not. Is that the argument though?
Simple exercise though. Compare both guys high profile matches against the same opponent.
Punk vs Undertaker (WM 29)
Punk vs Lesnar (Summerslam)
Reigns vs Undertaker (WM 33)
Reigns vs Lesnar (One of the 40000 times)
If you are a 'casual' fan who saw these high profile matches you wouldn't give a toss about the public image of the two men. You'd simply recognise Punk as being the better wrestler of the two world champions. Does that extend to 7 year old Jimmy who thinks winning is everything in wrestling? Perhaps not. Is that the argument though?
Having this controversial moron with his medieval views on gun rights and anti abortion rhetoric being supposedly cheered at Summerslam.
View attachment 1461518
The company should have stayed away from him.