List Mgmt. Mid Season Draft 2024 - Blues set to be active!

[agro]

I still think Kye Declase could be a handy utility for us, ready to go.

Melbourne chose to keep Clayton Oliver and we’ve already taken Elijah Hollands.

 

[katmanblue]

Melbourne chose to keep Clayton Oliver and we’ve already taken Elijah Hollands.

Bagman?

On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[BigFrizz36]

Need to take into account teams with unavailable list spots.

I think that poster did. No Hawks, Eagles etc.

 

[haveago]

He looks real good.....How old is he?

 

[Big Delut]

He looks real good.....How old is he?

According to the SANFL website he's 24

 

[Blue and Silver]

Need to take into account teams with unavailable list spots.

Not sure I understand?

each team with a list spot is listed.

Those without currently have no way to select in the MSD

On Pixel 7a using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Arr0w]

Not sure I understand?

each team with a list spot is listed.

Those without currently have no way to select in the MSD

On Pixel 7a using BigFooty.com mobile app

Any side without a current pick can put an injured player to LTI list

 

[Wickzki]

Jean Luc Velissaris

 

[katmanblue]

Jean Luc Velissaris

Tell me more

On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Wickzki]

Tell me more

On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app

Current Northern Bullant former Northern Blue.

25 years of age.

Has been considered by multiple clubs in past AFL drafts but never given an opportunity.

Undersized (sub-180cm) but can play all over the park.

Prolific ball winner at VFL level. Can kick consistently 40+ meters. Quite a few 50+ goals.

Potential for a Cincotta-like story.

Would fit in with the potential strategy of going one tall, one small.

 

[teddy-hopkins]

According to the SANFL website he's 24

Like the speed. Maybe field kicking is a bit rough but can find the goals.

 

[katmanblue]

Current Northern Bullant former Northern Blue.

25 years of age.

Has been considered by multiple clubs in past AFL drafts but never given an opportunity.

Undersized (sub-180cm) but can play all over the park.

Prolific ball winner at VFL level. Can kick consistently 40+ meters. Quite a few 50+ goals.

Potential for a Cincotta-like story.

Would fit in with the potential strategy of going one tall, one small.

Sounds good. What's the knock?

Just undersize or is there something else?

On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[DangerousD]

One Bailey Fritsch please or a Luke Ryan, or Sam Collins

 

[Soapy V]

Whoever we get I’d like to see ball use as a key component of their skill set. We need players that can hit targets and best option

 

[swuzzlebubble]

Jean Luc

 

[TENACIOUS]

Names are irrelevant…

You’d think we’d break it down to areas of need, then skill sets that are most important to us in that area of need… Then pick the best available, in that position and with the best skill set…

 

[swuzzlebubble]

Names are irrelevant…

You’d think we’d break it down to areas of need, then skill sets that are most important to us in that area of need… Then pick the best available, in that position and with the best skill set…

I think you're overthinking it, I think

 

[haveago]

View attachment 1966441

Smart hey........How many weeks did he miss again?

Hilarious.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

Get me a physically developed key defender and a midfielder with pace who can attend centre bounces. Just something to help the VFL team and be available for injuries.

 

[Bamboo Harvester]

Yes please!!!

 

[gandaal]

Get me a physically developed key defender and a midfielder with pace who can attend centre bounces. Just something to help the VFL team and be available for injuries.

No thanks. I'd rather Lemmey continue to develop as a key defender. And honestly if there's no chance of them playing AFL in their prefered position then I don't think we should draft them. That rules out mids IMO.

Small forwards, third tall forwards and rebounding defenders are the go imo.

 

[Coona Blues]

No thanks. I'd rather Lemmey continue to develop as a key defender. And honestly if there's no chance of them playing AFL in their prefered position then I don't think we should draft them. That rules out mids IMO.

Small forwards, third tall forwards and rebounding defenders are the go imo.

Absolutely, we look at drafting someone who can potentially impact the best 22 down the track, if not immediately.

We have enough decent VFL listed players to cobble together an adequate midfield at the lower level. However, if there is a kid or a state/country leaguer hidden out there, we absolutely should consider them.

We do not need “top ups”. Rucks are good, Sam Durdin was suspension not injury, so we have sufficient “big boppa”coverage. While missing Doc’s coverage in the guts, we have plenty of options. Our defensive injuries will right themselves prior to the mid season draft and we have plenty of smalls and developing outside types.

QUALITY is required, if available. If there are no standouts available at our pick, grab a kid with some potential upside. Not advocating specifically, but we have a Vic Metro KPD in Mardini on our VFL list (been injured), surprise 3rd forward/undersized KPF Rudd on our list and diamond in the rough decorated mid/defender Sruk on our list, just looking at the recent National draft. A couple of nice highlights packages doing the rounds for mature prospects as well.

I honestly would rather the picks not be used than ripping someone out if their established environment for a couple of months as top ups. If it comes down to that, we “must” reward our one or two of our VFL boys who would not be uprooted to get a probable short term taste.

 

[The Blue Weirdo]

Absolutely, we look at drafting someone who can potentially impact the best 22 down the track, if not immediately.

We have enough decent VFL listed players to cobble together an adequate midfield at the lower level. However, if there is a kid or a state/country leaguer hidden out there, we absolutely should consider them.

We do not need “top ups”. Rucks are good, Sam Durdin was suspension not injury, so we have sufficient “big boppa”coverage. While missing Doc’s coverage in the guts, we have plenty of options. Our defensive injuries will right themselves prior to the mid season draft and we have plenty of smalls and developing outside types.

QUALITY is required, if available. If there are no standouts available at our pick, grab a kid with some potential upside. Not advocating specifically, but we have a Vic Metro KPD in Mardini on our VFL list (been injured), surprise 3rd forward/undersized KPF Rudd on our list and diamond in the rough decorated mid/defender Sruk on our list, just looking at the recent National draft. A couple of nice highlights packages doing the rounds for mature prospects as well.

I honestly would rather the picks not be used than ripping someone out if their established environment for a couple of months as top ups. If it comes down to that, we “must” reward our one or two of our VFL boys who would not be uprooted to get a probable short term taste.

Anyone know what is going on with the mysterious 3rd FWD Rudd?
For all the excellent media releases concerning our AFL side, it wouldn't take too much trouble to include the VFL team occasionally.

 

[ITCHY EYEBALLS]

Names are irrelevant…

You’d think we’d break it down to areas of need, then skill sets that are most important to us in that area of need… Then pick the best available, in that position and with the best skill set…

What if his name was “Ace Skillset”?
Bet we’d pick him up.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

No thanks. I'd rather Lemmey continue to develop as a key defender. And honestly if there's no chance of them playing AFL in their prefered position then I don't think we should draft them. That rules out mids IMO.

Small forwards, third tall forwards and rebounding defenders are the go imo.

Mids with a point of difference are always welcome.

Lemmey may or may not make it. He's still young and raw.