LeverPuller
BigFooty Tanker
- Jun 23, 2011
- 35,110
- 40,623
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Newcastle United Seattle Seahawks
Various interests on 'land are positioning themselves for an assault on the current board - obviously 'land is viewed as important due to the sheer number of members who post on there.
But I view Gardner as simply being divisive and trying to seize control when the club is in dire straits, when a big part of the reasoning for it is the previous boards' mismanagement.
Ultimately, though, should the current board be punished for this too? They rightly prioritised off-field issues in 2009 due to the still-risky state of the clubs' finances, as well as the situation with Jim's health. While this single-mindedness was to the detriment of the club due to the influence it allowed Schwab to wield, it ultimately has and will continue to benefit the club in the long term. Furthermore, there are some great business minds on this board, and the board itself has a good reputation with the AFL due to their quick actions on various issues.
But I view Gardner as simply being divisive and trying to seize control when the club is in dire straits, when a big part of the reasoning for it is the previous boards' mismanagement.
Ultimately, though, should the current board be punished for this too? They rightly prioritised off-field issues in 2009 due to the still-risky state of the clubs' finances, as well as the situation with Jim's health. While this single-mindedness was to the detriment of the club due to the influence it allowed Schwab to wield, it ultimately has and will continue to benefit the club in the long term. Furthermore, there are some great business minds on this board, and the board itself has a good reputation with the AFL due to their quick actions on various issues.