Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would he have to buy back his own medals ?H-Sun now reporting that Poor Old Bucks had to buy back his own Brownlow & Copeland Trophy's at market value price
Women in a divorce will squeeze everything from a man they can and get out of it scott free although to be fair, this due to the fact that the man almost always earns more money. Mate just went through this and his new partner is in the opposite situation, because she earns 3x more than her ex.Very ordinary from his ex to have these liquidated as part of the settlement. Surely she's going to have enough money as is even though entitled to half it's just very average from her imo. Hope the club and supporters can buy most of it back and have it on display. The socks and shorts and some pics probably not worth the hassle. God forbid he's allowed to keep a sentimental photo or 2!
The details as we know it seem weird to me:
This is a man worth millions (and millions) who doesn't strike me as someone who would have burned it on gambling or dodgy investments, and who would be currently earning more than the value of this auction (IMO) in his media work.
We have a poor me story about an auction that at best might be worth a few hundred thousand dollars, that required Buckley to be interviewed and quoted.
So applying a critical lens one might conclude that:
This is a sob story designed to con fans into paying for this stuff and give it back to Buckley.
Added bonus if some bogans flame his ex-wife on social media and influence her decision-making in the divorce proceedings.
This is a good summary.
100% he'd be selling it as part of the settlement, unless he wants to spend the money to buy back his own stuff.The details as we know it seem weird to me:
This is a man worth millions (and millions) who doesn't strike me as someone who would have burned it on gambling or dodgy investments, and who would be currently earning more than the value of this auction (IMO) in his media work.
We have a poor me story about an auction that at best might be worth a few hundred thousand dollars, that required Buckley to be interviewed and quoted.
So applying a critical lens one might conclude that:
This is a sob story designed to con fans into paying for this stuff and give it back to Buckley.
Added bonus if some bogans flame his ex-wife on social media and influence her decision-making in the divorce proceedings.
Pretty s**t that his footy memorabilia was valued in a divorce settlement
Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk
100% he'd be selling it as part of the settlement, unless he wants to spend the money to buy back his own stuff.
She'll end up fat better financially than he ever will.
My best mate just spent 3 years going through this and his new Mrs is undergoing the same thing.Not biting at that one, but I would say to consider whether this story might be manipulating your response.
Or, TV interview pays well enough to fund a lot of the bidding.The details as we know it seem weird to me:
This is a man worth millions (and millions) who doesn't strike me as someone who would have burned it on gambling or dodgy investments, and who would be currently earning more than the value of this auction (IMO) in his media work.
We have a poor me story about an auction that at best might be worth a few hundred thousand dollars, that required Buckley to be interviewed and quoted.
So applying a critical lens one might conclude that:
This is a sob story designed to con fans into paying for this stuff and give it back to Buckley.
Added bonus if some bogans flame his ex-wife on social media and influence her decision-making in the divorce proceedings.
They’ve had to give up their career their earnings and super to raise children.My best mate just spent 3 years going through this and his new Mrs is undergoing the same thing.
The dependent partner always ends up far better off, unless they lose all custody, because even if you 50/50 assets, someone who's barely contributed financially will suddenly get a massive payout, whilst the primary bread-winner loses.
It's just how it is.
I get that there's giving up career stuff sometimes but when one partner straight up refuses to work(without discussing it prior mind you), kidnaps a kid multiple times, steals money off welfare from 2 governments(UK & Aus), makes false allegations about abuse and innuendo that her ex is a pedo(with nothing to back it up) and still gets a near $1m payout, with no repercussions, then the system is seriously faulty...They’ve had to give up their career their earnings and super to raise children.
Sometimes the piss is taken but alot of the time it’s equitable.
It may look distorted being a lump sum.
10,20,30 years of running a house and family.
You pay a nanny, cleaner, dry cleaner, tutor, cook and a finance manager for 10 yrs you would have a pretty big bill.
This is a sob story designed to con fans into paying for this stuff and give it back to Buckley.
That’s why I stated that some take the piss.I get that there's giving up career stuff sometimes but when one partner straight up refuses to work(without discussing it prior mind you), kidnaps a kid multiple times, steals money off welfare from 2 governments(UK & Aus), makes false allegations about abuse and innuendo that her ex is a pedo(with nothing to back it up) and still gets a near $1m payout, with no repercussions, then the system is seriously faulty...
I'd say it's more on the lawyers than the partners, tbh.That’s why I stated that some take the piss.
Your reference point is clearly in the taking the ******* piss group
Agreed, I have a friend who's keen to get his hands on that diamond G banger mentioned previously..Why isn't any of her stuff being sold?
Beetroot head will buy the Pies jumper, just to put on his blow up Nathan doll.I'm sure his best friend Mick Malthouse will buy some items. Or Eddie will and add it to his Nathan Buckley mancave/shrine!