Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
LIVE: Melbourne v Richmond - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Demons at 73% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 7
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
LIVE: Melbourne v Richmond - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Demons at 73% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
Serious question. Why was the surgeon checking his knee for damage after he strained a calf?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Serious answer: Might of injured two different body parts simultaneously.
Are you being serious?
Ross said in the interview that he tweaked both his knee and his calf.
You believe what you want. I don’t believe a word that comes out of any of their mouths when it comes to Max King’s injury. Might be wrong but I don’t trust them.
Per the footage on ch7 news, you can see Max has an awkward knee movement during one of the drills. They then had a surgeon check it out as a precaution and the results came back all clear.
Whatever it is, at this stage of career he seems far too fragile to trust. The contract given to him is a major concern. Should have spent the money on Wilkie who doesn’t miss a game and is a star.
Yes, because Wilkie is paid less due to Max's contract hahaha
Who plays more? Who’s body do you trust more? Who’s paid more? I don’t get your point.
Sure, lets pretend like the list management team were sitting with a pile of cash and debating whether to give it all to King or Wilkie
There’s no pretending. It’s fact. This is what our List management team did. They gave Max King one of the longest contracts in AFL history. All while he was still contracted for another 3 years. He’s 25 in a month or so, he’s never kicked more than 52 goals in a season and he can’t, and doesn’t look like getting on the park.Sure, lets pretend like the list management team were sitting with a pile of cash and debating whether to give it all to King or Wilkie
There is actually zero facts around Max's contract has anything to do with Wilkie and what we are paying him.There’s no pretending. It’s fact. This is what our List management team did. They gave Max King one of the longest contracts in AFL history. All while he was still contracted for another 3 years. He’s 25 in a month or so, he’s never kicked more than 52 goals in a season and he can’t, and doesn’t look like getting on the park.
It is a long contract, but where was it stated that he gets paid more than Wilkie? i never saw that written anywhere.There’s no pretending. It’s fact. This is what our List management team did. They gave Max King one of the longest contracts in AFL history. All while he was still contracted for another 3 years. He’s 25 in a month or so, he’s never kicked more than 52 goals in a season and he can’t, and doesn’t look like getting on the park.
Forget Wilkie. Was just trying to make a point about how we are spending our money.
Because its a seriously run football club...dealing with Country football, contracts have alot of clauses in them. Speaking with former AFL players, AFL contracts have even more
