Smith is very quirky ...Marnus just copies himBoth he and Marnus are definitely in the spectrum - they are signalling to no one
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Smith is very quirky ...Marnus just copies himBoth he and Marnus are definitely in the spectrum - they are signalling to no one
Ball is doing plenty. Shows how piss poor Starc was yesterday with the 2nd new ball.
with starc having a niggle would expect they would go the extra bowling depth with websterWebster would be the Marsh replacement
Which is why i am not certain Ussie goes yet, if he does going back to the guy who just got dropped for nothing being up to it without going back and playing shield cricket seems stupid.
IF they are certain they need to make the change i would have more confidence in Hunt over Sydney.
Maybe that’s why they are excellentBoth he and Marnus are definitely in the spectrum - they are signalling to no one
Tough gig for a new opener is 2 Tests in Galle.I'd probably stick with Usman till the end of the WTC cycle, then look to make the switch
Yeah, the BBL really ****s the calendar. I know it can't be moved because of the finances, but it does regularly mess with having players FC ready when needed.another issue is that the shield go backs on the 8th of feb
the sri lanka series starts late jan
I was never out there long enough to need to change gloves.During my local grade cricket days I literaly had the same pair of gloves for years.
I totally agree which is why I don’t think Hunt is a great option yet.As much as he's looked good this year, it's also worth remembering Hunt is off two years where he averaged ~20 odd in the shield.
Seeing where Australia's batting stocks are, I'd be comfortable going back to McSweeney as an opener, providing we're committed to Konstas as his partner (and are willing to give him a long leash). As much as you can say the lack of scoring shots, that's more to do with Australia having little-to-no answers to Bumrah, who in turn is having that kind of series that cements someone's legacy of being a generational bowler.
After all, it's not like Labs, Khawaja or even Smith (until he has been set and with an old ball) have faired any better.
That was then, this is now. Australia should ride Hunt's uptick in form. If it doesn't last, no big deal, McSweeney can take his place.As much as he's looked good this year, it's also worth remembering Hunt is off two years where he averaged ~20 odd in the shield.
Played with a guy who was . Did very similar things, very figgity and repeated movements.Both he and Marnus are definitely in the spectrum - they are signalling to no one
Wouldn't surprise me.I reckon Konstas will follow the usual path of Australian bats that end up having a solid career. Make a series of low scores, get dropped and go back to shield to work on some things then come back a more well rounded player.
*CalfJosh Inglis has a side strain and won't be in the squad for Sydney
Webster for me...Middle order bat & bowls seam plus spin...Perfect for the Sub ContinentCertainly an option, and the options to fill the then absent #5/6 spot look better than to fill an opening role as things stand.
Wouldn't surprise me.
I'm not being critical but we need to be realistic .
Webster is a good replacement for Marsh & gives us a 5th bowling option.Well there goes the Marsh replacement.