Anthony Albanese - How long? -2-

Remove this Banner Ad

Our birthrate is declining year on year. Who's going to comprise the workforce to support an aging population?

I'm shocked you have such a narrow view though.
Shocked, I tells ya.
Increased productivity, lots of manual jobs are being automated, improving training to reduce our high levels of underemployment, better health which is letting people live and work longer.

Reducing immigration to what we need (not what business lobbyists want to suppress wages and increase turn over) will also help with the environment, less carbon emissions by reducing the increases in transport and infrastructure requirements, less urban sprawl over prime agricultural land and unspoiled land.

On SM-A125F using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Increased productivity, lots of manual jobs are being automated, improving training to reduce our high levels of underemployment, better health which is letting people live and work longer.

Reducing immigration to what we need (not what business lobbyists want to suppress wages and increase turn over) will also help with the environment, less carbon emissions by reducing the increases in transport and infrastructure requirements, less urban sprawl over prime agricultural land and unspoiled land.

On SM-A125F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Less carbon emissions?? Are they coming from another planet?
 
Increased productivity, lots of manual jobs are being automated, improving training to reduce our high levels of underemployment, better health which is letting people live and work longer.

Reducing immigration to what we need (not what business lobbyists want to suppress wages and increase turn over) will also help with the environment, less carbon emissions by reducing the increases in transport and infrastructure requirements, less urban sprawl over prime agricultural land and unspoiled land.

On SM-A125F using BigFooty.com mobile appHow exactly does reducing immigration help the environment?

How exactly does reducing immigration help the environment?

You are aware that those people will still exist, whether they have landed here or not?
 
How exactly does reducing immigration help the environment?

You are aware that those people will still exist, whether they have landed here or not?
Without boat arrivals the Libs are struggling for ideas in opposition and an all purpose anti immigration campaign that can be Taylored to suit any claim seems to be the current way forward.
 
How exactly does reducing immigration help the environment?

You are aware that those people will still exist, whether they have landed here or not?
And Chinas emissions will still dwarf anything we do. Yet when this gets brought up people claim we need to look after ourselves first and lead the way...

Let's lead the way by having less than 100k people arrive per month which isn't remotely sustainable on any metric
 
And Chinas emissions will still dwarf anything we do. Yet when this gets brought up people claim we need to look after ourselves first and lead the way...

Let's lead the way by having less than 100k people arrive per month which isn't remotely sustainable on any metric

But bringing in more people will reduce our emissions "per capita".
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

And Chinas emissions will still dwarf anything we do. Yet when this gets brought up people claim we need to look after ourselves first and lead the way...

Let's lead the way by having less than 100k people arrive per month which isn't remotely sustainable on any metric

That in no way answers my question.

Try again.
 
Yeah, I know its got a fair share of old fashioned politicking behind it, but as the grandson of a Gallipoli veteran the Australian and PNG PMs walking (a section of) the Kokoda Track together in the lead up to Anzac Day makes me feel pretty proud. Especially given the role of the 'Angels' during the Kokoda campaign.

Hopefully Albanese will announce the provision of funding to the PNG govt. to repair the track in a tasteful way given that it is in a very sad state of repair.

1713851296972.png

 
This bloke has his finger well and truly on the pulse:


After the horror of Bondi and Wakeley, we needed leadership. Instead, we got Albo​



A prime minister would have, should have urgently convened a special task force or national roundtable, an emergency summit, to address the mental illness crisis in Australia, or establish a special envoy to do something substantial, national, meaningful to combat violence against the
Albanese was angrier and more active in response to the unfortunate accidental death of an Australian aid worker in the war zone of Gaza than he has been in the wake of the Bondi Junction horror.
He did not hesitate to deploy a special envoy to pester the Israeli government, under attack as it is, from the psychotic Islamic Republic of Iran and in the middle of an existential war with the (actual) genocidal rapists, murderers and hostage-takers of Hamas.
But here, at home, where we need a prime minister, a leader, we’re getting bluster. Fake outrage, faux tears, empty emotion.
This week has shown, confirmed, that this is a Prime Minister out of touch with Australians. At best, he has a superficial understanding of middle Australia, in all its complicated glory.
We were all amazed by the magnificent Bollard Man, of course we were. Albanese knew that. How could he not. So he latched on to him. He became Albanese’s narrative, his safety net. The most superficial path he could possibly take in response to this unspeakably devastating massacre. Albanese took it. Substance, or a lack of it, is Albanese’s kryptonite. Always has been. We saw it with the Voice. We are seeing it now, confronted with a national tragedy, and a society riven with division bubbling barely below the surface.
While we lost one leader this week, fortunately we found another.
NSW Premier Chris Minns, confronted by the horror unfurling in his city, stepped up. Prime Minister Albanese curled up.
Where Minns grew. Albanese shrank.
Albanese praised the bystanders who ran into danger at Bondi Junction last Saturday. He ran away in its aftermath.
Fragile as he is, Albanese will be outraged by this analysis, dismissing it, by the numbers, as wildly unfair. He will, again, miss the point, and will be destined to repeat the same mistakes.
Sadly so, for all of us.
 
This bloke has his finger well and truly on the pulse:


After the horror of Bondi and Wakeley, we needed leadership. Instead, we got Albo​



A prime minister would have, should have urgently convened a special task force or national roundtable, an emergency summit, to address the mental illness crisis in Australia, or establish a special envoy to do something substantial, national, meaningful to combat violence against the
Albanese was angrier and more active in response to the unfortunate accidental death of an Australian aid worker in the war zone of Gaza than he has been in the wake of the Bondi Junction horror.
He did not hesitate to deploy a special envoy to pester the Israeli government, under attack as it is, from the psychotic Islamic Republic of Iran and in the middle of an existential war with the (actual) genocidal rapists, murderers and hostage-takers of Hamas.
But here, at home, where we need a prime minister, a leader, we’re getting bluster. Fake outrage, faux tears, empty emotion.
This week has shown, confirmed, that this is a Prime Minister out of touch with Australians. At best, he has a superficial understanding of middle Australia, in all its complicated glory.
We were all amazed by the magnificent Bollard Man, of course we were. Albanese knew that. How could he not. So he latched on to him. He became Albanese’s narrative, his safety net. The most superficial path he could possibly take in response to this unspeakably devastating massacre. Albanese took it. Substance, or a lack of it, is Albanese’s kryptonite. Always has been. We saw it with the Voice. We are seeing it now, confronted with a national tragedy, and a society riven with division bubbling barely below the surface.
While we lost one leader this week, fortunately we found another.
NSW Premier Chris Minns, confronted by the horror unfurling in his city, stepped up. Prime Minister Albanese curled up.
Where Minns grew. Albanese shrank.
Albanese praised the bystanders who ran into danger at Bondi Junction last Saturday. He ran away in its aftermath.
Fragile as he is, Albanese will be outraged by this analysis, dismissing it, by the numbers, as wildly unfair. He will, again, miss the point, and will be destined to repeat the same mistakes.
Sadly so, for all of us.

Interesting for an "article" criticising a lack of substance, that the proposed solutions were a task force, a summit, a roundtable, a special envoy, and then makes a completely one-sided characterisation of the current events in Israel/Gaza.
 
Interesting for an "article" criticising a lack of substance, that the proposed solutions were a task force, a summit, a roundtable, a special envoy, and then makes a completely one-sided characterisation of the current events in Israel/Gaza.
Also characterises the murder of Lalzawmi Frankcom as an unfortunate accident.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top