This is from Popowski.....
Interesting he's grabbed the positions from CD. Wouldn't surprise me if the game just makes it up as they go along. Would be rough not to get anyone noteworthy outside of Sanders given the lack of options to start.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 10
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
This is from Popowski.....
Given everyones strategy was likely wait for the first round DPPs to save our forwardlines.... its going to be a rough wait until the 2nd round of DPPs.Interesting he's grabbed the positions from CD. Wouldn't surprise me if the game just makes it up as they go along. Would be rough not to get anyone noteworthy outside of Sanders given the lack of options to start.
100%. Where there is no transparency it's usually complete unmitigated bullshit.Interesting he's grabbed the positions from CD. Wouldn't surprise me if the game just makes it up as they go along. Would be rough not to get anyone noteworthy outside of Sanders given the lack of options to start.
Even worse they pushed it back a round this year for 1st DPP. (Assume others are still pre rd 12 & 18.Given everyones strategy was likely wait for the first round DPPs to save our forwardlines.... its going to be a rough wait until the 2nd round of DPPs.
Yep. I'm struggling with this week's trades because I don't know what to do with Jordon. I don't like the upgrade or downgrade options this week.Given everyones strategy was likely wait for the first round DPPs to save our forwardlines.... its going to be a rough wait until the 2nd round of DPPs.
Yep, slim pickings, looks like a 95 average might cover the F6 spot with Powell and McKay rounding out F5 & F6, Heeney, Flanders, Zorko and Jackson filling out the other spots.Interesting he's grabbed the positions from CD. Wouldn't surprise me if the game just makes it up as they go along. Would be rough not to get anyone noteworthy outside of Sanders given the lack of options to start.
I read somewhere around the start of the season that this was the lowest number of DPP's available for a number of years, maybe those 57 additions is just reverting to the average.57 seems excessive though, when have we had that many dpp?
Feel like the calcs are off due to that
Edit: he is including one gamers in there so it may checkout if you filter them all out (think it's 4 games needed?)
It's 50% of games played this year, so 3 games57 seems excessive though, when have we had that many dpp?
Feel like the calcs are off due to that
Edit: he is including one gamers in there so it may checkout if you filter them all out (think it's 4 games needed?)
Harry McKay or Luke Jackson? (for draft)
McKay because he doesn't have plates for handsHarry McKay or Luke Jackson? (for draft)
Harry McKayor Luke JacksonPLAYERCARDSTART10Harry Mckay
- Age
- 26
- Ht
- 200cm
- Wt
- 106kg
- Pos.
- Fwd
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 9.9
- 3star
- K
- 7.5
- 3star
- HB
- 2.4
- 2star
- M
- 5.5
- 5star
- T
- 1.6
- 4star
- G
- 1.4
- 5star
- D
- 6.6
- 1star
- K
- 4.6
- 2star
- HB
- 2.0
- 1star
- M
- 3.6
- 4star
- T
- 1.4
- 2star
- G
- 1.4
- 5star
- D
- 8.8
- 3star
- K
- 6.8
- 3star
- HB
- 2.0
- 2star
- M
- 4.4
- 4star
- T
- 0.8
- 3star
- G
- 2.0
- 5star
PLAYERCARDEND? (for draft)PLAYERCARDSTART9Luke Jackson
- Age
- 22
- Ht
- 199cm
- Wt
- 102kg
- Pos.
- F/R
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 8.3
- 2star
- K
- 3.3
- 1star
- HB
- 5.0
- 4star
- M
- 1.5
- 2star
- T
- 1.0
- 3star
- G
- 0.3
- 3star
- D
- 8.3
- 2star
- K
- 3.3
- 1star
- HB
- 5.0
- 3star
- M
- 1.5
- 2star
- T
- 1.0
- 2star
- G
- 0.3
- 3star
- D
- 8.3
- 3star
- K
- 3.3
- 2star
- HB
- 5.0
- 4star
- M
- 1.5
- 2star
- T
- 1.0
- 3star
- G
- 0.3
- 3star
PLAYERCARDEND
Only other ruck is English, but I'd look to bring one in on the bench.Depends on your ruck stocks I think.
I'd only be interested in targeting Jackson if a) he was notably cheaper to acquire than McKay or b) you already had Darcy as your R1. His fantasy form since the big boy returned has been average (and roughly 20 points per game lower than McKay).Only other ruck is English, but I'd look to bring one in on the bench.
I've already got Jackson atm. Exploring the opportunity of trading him (possibly packaged up with Guthrie as my midfield is stacked) to get McKay.I'd only be interested in targeting Jackson if a) he was notably cheaper to acquire than McKay or b) you already had Darcy as your R1. His fantasy form since the big boy returned has been average (and roughly 20 points per game lower than McKay).