![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/west_coast.png)
- Thread starter
- #326
Have to wait until Sunday for this massacre..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join the Sweet FA and sign up for State Of Origin! Rivalry, Banter and New Friends made along the way in Bigfooty’s own AFL-Style simulated game. Everyone Welcome! -- Sweet Football Association - Since 2001 AD
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17 ⚽ Champs League 24 - Quals
Have to wait until Sunday for this massacre..
Would be good info to have. Bloke on twitter doesn’t post that tho.What was our expected score at 3/4 time when we had 27?
To be fair I think this ignores the pace of said tall players lol.God Dammit Keys, you and your facts are not welcome here!
his standard position?
Sub to be one of JJ or Brockman
Cole named on the field but always starts on the bench, doesn’t matter where they are named.JJ named in a field position.(unusually as a wing)
So interchange - Williams, Chesser, Rotham, Culley, and Brockman as sub which makes sense...
Oh right I forgot positions at WC are fixed and playing FF for one out of the past 2 and a half seasons means you get to take the spot of the guy who's recent form in the position is at a higher level than you've ever achieved, and has him in AA contention.
Oscar will no doubt play some time at FF this week but perhaps an ounce of respect for Jake, even if just on paper, might have been nice. Don't anyone pretend that the players don't care about this stuff, that Jake wouldn't of preferred to to be named as top dog or that Oscar isn't loving the fact he gets the instant gratification either.
For sure, but Cole is a guaranteed starter. Anyone named on field is a starter. Not everyone named on interchange is a starter. The bench is rotating and resting continually with lots of players on the bench. Between JJ and Brockman and his time off, just feel he starts as sub, and JJ is a starter, probably on bench with Chesser on wing.Cole named on the field but always starts on the bench, doesn’t matter where they are named.
Oh right I forgot positions at WC are fixed and playing FF for one out of the past 2 and a half seasons means you get to take the spot of the guy who's recent form in the position is at a higher level than you've ever achieved, and has him in AA contention.
Oscar will no doubt play some time at FF this week but perhaps an ounce of respect for Jake, even if just on paper, might have been nice. Don't anyone pretend that the players don't care about this stuff, that Jake wouldn't of preferred to to be named as top dog or that Oscar isn't loving the fact he gets the instant gratification either.
I mean darling and Cripps kicked 2 goals 6 between them which is a huge anomaly. The other players who kicked more points than goals were culley, sheed, McGovern, Maric and Hutchinson. Only two of those are forwards.
If you think norths absolute dominance early was because of our forwards and not our mids I’m not sure what to say.
I mean our expected score from the game was 75 and we scored 65. A lot of our misses weren’t high quality chances.
When yeo started dominating in the last we scored with ease.
do you realise he was named at HF against North? Allen's inclusion pushed Darling to the pocket and BWilliams to the bench
but go off i guess
Waterman still played full forward against North, and was probably named at CHF for no reason other than to have this answer ready to go for when Simmo gets asked about it at his next presser.
Doesnt matter where on the team sheets theyre named, anybody could be subJJ named in a field position,
So interchange - Williams, Chesser, Rotham, Culley, and Brockman as sub which makes sense...
Doesnt matter where on the team sheets theyre named, anybody could be sub
I did know that, but having Miguel on block I was hoping no one thought posting about it was some kind of relevant point.
Waterman still played full forward against North, and was probably named at CHF for no reason other than to have this answer ready to go for when Simmo gets asked about it at his next presser.
Who will play full forward out of Oscar and Jake has been a focus for the media for months. Both of them have been asked on camera whats going to happen when Oscar comes back. For anyone paying any attention at all to this sub plot there was intrigue as to who would be named where when Oscar returned because obviously that's an interesting story, and how its handled is an insight into the clubs culture.
Clubs with a strong culture would back the form player in, make a bit of a show of the returning star having to earn his spot back. Where they actually play on Sunday is less important as that situation is fluid. The team announcements of starting positions are symbolic and the club chose to send the message here that reputation is king, which fits perfectly with what they are about but yes, it shits me. Because it's kind of dishonourable and antithetical to good culture.
Is it a small thing, yeah sure but to me it was a test of character for Oscar Allen as well. He's captain so should be grateful he doesn't have to come back through the seconds- which in itself sends the wrong message to the team about selection integrity. It would have been appropriate for him to say "this is a bit of a bad look. Name me on the bench, or in a pocket, or up the ground and give Jake a bit of symbolic acknowledgement for what he's achieved." He's done nothing to earn his spot back at all. He may yet prove he deserves it over Waterman in coming weeks, but a good leader has a bit more humility I think. Especially if he has confidence in himself.
Based on this being correct, my best guess is
Backs - McGovern, Barrass, Rotham, Witherden, Hough, Duggan, Cole
Rucks - Flynn, Williams
Mids - Yeo, Ginbey, Chesser, Hunt, Jones, Petruccelle
Forwards - Allen, Waterman, Darling, Maric, Cripps, Ryan, Brockman
(Ryan and Brockman to have stints rotating through midfield with Jones and Petch)
Sub - Culley
Traveller - Hutchinson to give him a look at what that entails
WAFL - Gaff, Edwards
Unlucky to miss - Trew, Hall, Dewar
In : Allen, Hunt, Rotham, Brockman
Out : Sheed, Gaff, Edwards, Hutchinson
Culley sub in lieu of Maric
It’s probably about as best we could select with maybe the exception of either Trew or Hall instead on one of the forwards we’ve picked
they should drop Waterman to the WAFL just to spite this post
yepcould even be Waterman