Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
For 3 extra frames? If that is the reason then it is an absolute load of bollocks. We let blokes have a drink every second over, but can't spare 15 seconds to triple check a decision about a wicket?Time constraint I'd say.
It took them way too long as it was.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I agree. You definitely can’t overturn a decision based on a still image.
Not so much for between balls, but definitely between overs. It'll never happen though because broadcasters have cricket admin by the short and curlies.Baseball introduced a pitch clock, there's no reason cricket can't do the same with bowlers to keep up the over rate.
Sure. If you stop batsman having drinks/gloves breaks every 15 minutes and remove the DRS.Baseball introduced a pitch clock, there's no reason cricket can't do the same with bowlers to keep up the over rate.
Well they didn't overturn on a single image with no audio though, did they.
Yeah, looks like he nicked it so the ball has deviated the other way.
That means nothing. The ball could be 2inches in front the bat or after contact from that still image. Without a corresponding side shot of the same moment it means nothing.
Overall he's a great of the game and a great person, but also a bit of a weird and somewhat selfish unit. You've read about his effort in the first ever ODI world cup game, yeah?
For 3 extra frames? If that is the reason then it is an absolute load of bollocks. We let blokes have a drink every second over, but can't spare 15 seconds to triple check a decision about a wicket?
If anyone is unsure of his standing in the game, just remember that he averaged 65 against the West Indies, at their peak in the 70s and 80s.India's version of Boycott, a good opener though and he was one of the first Indian batsmen that didn't take any shit from anyone.
Up until he arrived India were subservient to the likes of Australia and England but he took the fight to them and stood his ground.
Show the frame before.
Limited overs has an innings timer.Baseball introduced a pitch clock, there's no reason cricket can't do the same with bowlers to keep up the over rate.
fines don't work though. might be time to seriously consider penalty runs.Limited overs has an innings timer.
All test matches need is match referees with a backbone and start fining and suspending players for not meeting the 15 overs per hour.
Where are OP's understating him?If anyone is unsure of his standing in the game, just remember that he averaged 65 against the West Indies, at their peak in the 70s and 80s.
If anyone is unsure of his standing in the game, just remember that he averaged 65 against the West Indies, at their peak in the 70s and 80s.
The WTC point penalties are pretty bigLimited overs has an innings timer.
All test matches need is match referees with a backbone and start fining and suspending players for not meeting the 15 overs per hour.
It's 23 degrees here todayWith global warming we might not be able to ask players to bowl 15 overs an hour in the future anyway.