What the stats show with midfield clearances etc are a bit deceiving. Yes you could mount an argument to say we've been "smashed" in the middle. I would tend to look at what's happening around the ground at 50/50 contests (ball ups / throw ins) and to the naked eye it seems that we're getting out muscled and are being out hunted for the ball.I agree with the concept, but we can't deny we've got several under-performers (if not out-right passengers). I don't know whether it's form or a niggle, but Blicavs hasn't had the impact over the last several weeks that he normally has.
Same with Guthrie. Has a completely valid excuse, but the facts are he's not getting close to the same level of possessions.
We've been smashed in the middle for the past 3 weeks. Going back to what used to work is unlikely to fix that if the players can't compete at the level they used to.
I've gone off track with the "Neale as 2nd ruck". You don't have to agree with it, and even I have to admit it's kind of shoe-horning Neale in, but it gives Blicavs a break and is one (of several) options we could look at to try and break the rut our midfield is in.
I don't think it's an effort related problem. We did enough to get us to 7-0 albeit largely against sides lower down the ladder. But I think we're lacking a bit of attack on the ball which is what Dangerfield brings - and there's a noticeable lack of pace when we try and spread from a contest.
There's no magic fix - we've basically got the same playing group now that helped us get to 7-0. Guthrie and Rohan have come back into the team as well. Some of the in game moves are also counter intuitive I think to how C Scott wants to set up. We've had to try and use Blicavs more as an inside mid or permanent ruck in recent weeks - when his greatest value to the team is roaming the ground and only providing an occasional chop out in the ruck.