Port should win comfortably. A longer break and at home.
There will be no dying wondering though
There will be no dying wondering though
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I actually feel like the narrative is the opposite from Port fans.Or like if port win its Ken, and when they lose it’s the players and the fans
Yeah well, the players over the last 12 years have been turned over, and yet the common denominator still escapes the media’s and club management’s blame.I actually feel like the narrative is the opposite from Port fans.
The answer is somewhere in the middle: everyone is to blame, and everyone gets the credit.
I admit that I got sucked in again.Yeah well, the players over the last 12 years have been turned over, and yet the common denominator still escapes the media’s and club management’s blame.
Yes, but they also respond when Kens job is on the line, like 13 straight last year and after the Lions game booing 2 months ago.I admit that I got sucked in again.
It would be so Hinkley to knock out the media darlings and most hyped team Hawthorn, when few give Port a chance.
Then they'd have their bunnies, Sydney.
Surely not. But it can't be ruled out. Expectations are the things that seem to cripple Hinkley's sides.
Based on what usually happens when these threads get made, Hawthorn will lose to Port.
Yep, you've summarised the situation well. My main concern is whether they can rescue the half back drive without Houston and Farrel. You kind of need an effective slingshot game to punish Hawthorn, or else they will just swarm you like they did with Footscray the other night.Yes, but they also respond when Kens job is on the line, like 13 straight last year and after the Lions game booing 2 months ago.
No one expected us to make the 8 and yet we finished 2nd.
Thursday was as bad a performance as Ive seen in a while, but it was also not a career deciding game for Ken as they have a 2nd chance.
From now on its cut throat, Kens time at Port is in the hands of the players who obviously want him so dont be suprised if they 'play for keeps'.
I'd go as far as to say they left plenty in the tank knowing they have already taken care of their remaining 3 opponants since rd10.
Dogs had an off night. Never as good or as bad is it seems. They'll get beat next week by Port
And when Hawks threw away a 42pt lead it was 'they went defensive too early'.Amazing just how many teams have had one of their worst performance of the year against Hawthorn this year.
It happened almost every time they won
And when Hawks threw away a 42pt lead it was 'they went defensive too early'.
Theres always a narrative.
You only play as well as your opposition lets you.
All they had to do was kick 1 goal in the back half of that game coming from 42pts up and couldnt do it.
You might 'go defensive', lots of teams do, but they still score.
We didnt let them..
SCG is only 5 metres shorter and 5 metres narrower than MCG. It's bigger than Marvel and Adelaide Oval, where we have played well at. It's not "small".
Yeah, no doubt, it cost you a goal, what about the other 6 zip?Apparently all that was needed for the game to end 20 seconds earlier…..as it should have been
Yeah, no doubt, it cost you a goal, what about the other 6 zip?
And you cant just chop 20s off the end of the game, it doesnt work that way.
Take the 20s off when it should have come off and we might have had more urgency earlier.
I doubt we'll be giving you a 7 goal head start this week.
Not with Ken's job on the line.
Yeah but we scored when you built your 42pt lead, you didnt let us play great but we still took some opportunities.Your team played as well as our team let them. I get that they’ll be desperate
It's 0-3 at the SCG. Swans are 0-8 vs Port.I'd like those odds if I was Sydney. 3-0 and the SCG.
I need my eyes checked.It's 0-3 at the SCG. Swans are 0-8 vs Port.