Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sydney are my early tip for the flag.Sydney cleaned up getting Grundy and Adams. Exactly what we needed a ruck and inside mid.
I thought the opposite.I get that "Mack" is new to the media role but his 8-minute interview on our website and that interview have been unimpressive in my view. You always felt confident SW was on top of things.
When have we said we're targeting Sanders?I don't think we are targeting Sanders. Why hint and show your hand - there must be someone else they are targeting
I'm similar but Stevens will be gone before then. As long as we get Hastie or Lual I'm happy.We won’t but if we were to hold our picks then I’d go something like this -
8 - Sanders or Curtin (reckon there’s a 50% chance one will fall). If both gone next best for me is O’Sullivan.
25 - Hastie - he’ll land around here in the draft.
76 - Philactides - well regarded as a bottom aged player last year. Gone off the radar a bit this year but will make a useful small defender imo.
87 - George Stevens - reckon there’s a chance he goes undrafted. Happy to roll the dice on him this late in the draft if we don’t take Sanders earlier.
How Come you're avoiding my question?Port will definitely dump hayes and lycett so i wouldnt be surprised if we signed one for ruck cover much as id like a better ruck-D grade cover is better than no cover. So good point.
Bailey VDH?
If you're not dutch you're not much. Hey VdubsYeah the Dutch guy!
There never was a mystery mid. I don’t know who it was but someone on here just made it up unfortunately and rolled with it.When is the mystery mid trade happening? And where is our replacement ruck for Stanley..
That was Ian Pelham.There never was a mystery mid. I don’t know who it was but someone on here just made it up unfortunately and rolled with it.
So do you think we use those last two picks? Which will be in the 60s I suppose by the time everyone passes.You can just upgrade rookies - don't need to use draft picks to do so
They'll be earlier.So do you think we use those last two picks? Which will be in the 60s I suppose by the time everyone passes.
I wonder whether we do get rookies or late draft. They only difference is a 1 year vs 2 year contract?
Don't worry about it, mate. Go outside. Smell some fresh air. Touch some grass. You'll be okay.Yeah because 25 right at the start of trade period wasn't enough so Mackie wanted draft picks equalling zero draft points to get it done but it was all Ports fault!!!
You picked up 4 potatoes and used 2 years of draft picks. You'll be OK.Yeah because 25 right at the start of trade period wasn't enough so Mackie wanted draft picks equalling zero draft points to get it done but it was all Ports fault!!!
For a contracted player worth more than what we got. You got overs right off the bat with 25.Your club just haggled the entire period to get some 4th rounders thrown in with the BZT and Duursma deal. You forfeited your right to take the moral high ground.
Been travelling our wonderful country for the last 4 months champDon't worry about it, mate. Go outside. Smell some fresh air. Touch some grass. You'll be okay.
You sound angry.For a contracted player worth more than what we got. You got overs right off the bat with 25.
And you're still this tightly wound up?Been travelling our wonderful country for the last 4 months champ
Given you used the word champ I strongly disagree.I just pointed out some deranged poster, hardly wound up
I admittedly haven't watched Mackie and am basing it on what others have said in this threadWhen have we said we're targeting Sanders?
We're too smart to give away trade targets in the media. I've heard others say it but I'm yet to see a direct quote.I admittedly haven't watched Mackie and am basing it on what others have said in this thread
I'll have a plate.Cool story
Time to run on - unless you've got some butter chicken to share...
I just pointed out some deranged poster, hardly wound up
I am a champ. I've got 119 reasons why.Good for you, champ
Good for you, champ
I would have liked you to have written Champ 119 times - would have been great for effect.I am a champ. I've got 119 reasons why.