Given the current debate around Buckley's future as coach of Collingwood I thought now is an appropriate time to bring up this topic.
A common sub debate that stems from the Buckley discussion is the question of the role of the supporter when the side is underperforming.
The two sides to the argument are generally
1. Get behind the club no matter what, they need our support in both the good and bad times
2. As supporters, we should not accept mediocrity and if we are performing poorly we have the right to call the club out on it
As someone who is by nature a glass half empty as opposed to glass half full type, I tend to fall into the 2nd category.
A common argument as that unless we demand success as supporters, the club will become complacent and underachieve.
IMO, we are overrating the amount of influence supporters have. Despite seeing myself as someone in the 2nd category, I don't believe the actions of supporters have a material impact on the clubs success.
Are supporters of successful sides really any different to supporters of unsuccessful sides? Do Richmond fans (for example) accept mediocrity'which is why they haven't won a flag in 30 years? Are there any examples where the actions of supporters have turned around the on field fortunes of a club? (I'm not talking about saving a club from extiction btw, in which case I agree supporters have a big role to play, but in terms of achieving onfield success)
To summarise, we can support/ question the club however we see fit but IMO the way we act has little bearing on our onfield performance.
I'd be interested to hear other people thoughts on the topic
A common sub debate that stems from the Buckley discussion is the question of the role of the supporter when the side is underperforming.
The two sides to the argument are generally
1. Get behind the club no matter what, they need our support in both the good and bad times
2. As supporters, we should not accept mediocrity and if we are performing poorly we have the right to call the club out on it
As someone who is by nature a glass half empty as opposed to glass half full type, I tend to fall into the 2nd category.
A common argument as that unless we demand success as supporters, the club will become complacent and underachieve.
IMO, we are overrating the amount of influence supporters have. Despite seeing myself as someone in the 2nd category, I don't believe the actions of supporters have a material impact on the clubs success.
Are supporters of successful sides really any different to supporters of unsuccessful sides? Do Richmond fans (for example) accept mediocrity'which is why they haven't won a flag in 30 years? Are there any examples where the actions of supporters have turned around the on field fortunes of a club? (I'm not talking about saving a club from extiction btw, in which case I agree supporters have a big role to play, but in terms of achieving onfield success)
To summarise, we can support/ question the club however we see fit but IMO the way we act has little bearing on our onfield performance.
I'd be interested to hear other people thoughts on the topic