Play Nice 46th President of the United States: Joe Biden 2: Incidit in scyllam cupiens vitare charybdim

Remove this Banner Ad

Letting off nukes is the reason they will not cut off aid.

When things were going bad in the 1973 war, Israel made it clear it was going to use nukes rather than go down.

So the US intervened.

If things go bad for Israel, they WILL use nukes.

Still want the US to cut military aid?

On SM-A346E using BigFooty.com mobile app
Sounds like a rogue nuclear state.
 
Letting off nukes is the reason they will not cut off aid.

When things were going bad in the 1973 war, Israel made it clear it was going to use nukes rather than go down.

So the US intervened.

If things go bad for Israel, they WILL use nukes.

Still want the US to cut military aid?

On SM-A346E using BigFooty.com mobile app

By this logic we should give North Korea whatever they want
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Sounds like a rogue nuclear state.
To be fair, this is the reason countries like that have them.

The problem is, of the states that have nukes, the one most likely to find enemies at its borders that it cannot stop, is Israel.

So, the state most likely to be put in a position where they would need to consider them, of the countries that have them, is Israel, and I dont think there is any doubt what they would decide.

This reality has more influence on US policy making than Jewish lobbyists imop.
 
I'd feel safer with North Korean having nukes than I do with Netanyahu having his finger on the trigger.
If he isn't itching to use them, he is at least itching to threaten to use them.

If the world didn't have strong men determined to protect their countries, the world wouldn't need strong men determined to protect their countries.
 
To be fair, this is the reason countries like that have them.

The problem is, of the states that have nukes, the one most likely to find enemies at its borders that it cannot stop, is Israel.

So, the state most likely to be put in a position where they would need to consider them, of the countries that have them, is Israel, and I dont think there is any doubt what they would decide.

This reality has more influence on US policy making than Jewish lobbyists imop.
1. Move from Russia to Israel.

2. ???

3. Nuclear war!
 
With all these peaceful protests on university campus condemning genocide having riot police rock up and arrest everyone including faculty. This is where radicalisation and revolution begins.

Tax payer dollars going to Israel to fund a genocide when most Americans are struggling to get by is pissing off supporters on the left and right of politics

It doesn't matter who wins the election now America's descent into fascism has already begun.

The ruling class want to hold on to power, and will do so by any means necessary.
 
With all these peaceful protests on university campus condemning genocide having riot police rock up and arrest everyone including faculty. This is where radicalisation and revolution begins.

Tax payer dollars going to Israel to fund a genocide when most Americans are struggling to get by is pissing off supporters on the left and right of politics

It doesn't matter who wins the election now America's descent into fascism has already begun.

The ruling class want to hold on to power, and will do so by any means necessary.
It's America. They gotta keep the prisons full, by any means necessary :$
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

in a sense, it’s hobson’s choice election. america is stuffed.


The clickbait is not entirely correct

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/2...-ruling-demands-pledge-not-to-boycott-israel/

Its a promise not to boycott - do I think its stupid - yes.

“By the express[ed] terms of the Act, Arkansas seeks not only to avoid contracting with companies that refuse to do business with Israel,” Judge Jane Kelly is reported saying in Al Jazeera. “It also seeks to avoid contracting with anyone who supports or promotes such activity.”

She said the law allows the state – in violation of the First Amendment – to “consider a company’s speech and association with others to determine whether that company is participating in a ‘boycott of Israel’”.

Such speech, which would be prohibited under the law, Kelly argued, may include “posting anti-Israel signs, donating to causes that promote a boycott of Israel, encouraging others to boycott Israel, or even publicly criticizing the Act.”
 
The clickbait is not entirely correct

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/2...-ruling-demands-pledge-not-to-boycott-israel/

Its a promise not to boycott - do I think its stupid - yes.

“By the express[ed] terms of the Act, Arkansas seeks not only to avoid contracting with companies that refuse to do business with Israel,” Judge Jane Kelly is reported saying in Al Jazeera. “It also seeks to avoid contracting with anyone who supports or promotes such activity.”

She said the law allows the state – in violation of the First Amendment – to “consider a company’s speech and association with others to determine whether that company is participating in a ‘boycott of Israel’”.

Such speech, which would be prohibited under the law, Kelly argued, may include “posting anti-Israel signs, donating to causes that promote a boycott of Israel, encouraging others to boycott Israel, or even publicly criticizing the Act.”
I'd like to see a selection of some of these conservatives' reactions to the tiki lamp protesters, synagogue bombings, and other hate crimes aimed at Jews by white Christians.
 
To be fair, this is the reason countries like that have them.

The problem is, of the states that have nukes, the one most likely to find enemies at its borders that it cannot stop, is Israel.

So, the state most likely to be put in a position where they would need to consider them, of the countries that have them, is Israel, and I dont think there is any doubt what they would decide.

This reality has more influence on US policy making than Jewish lobbyists imop.

Israel won’t let off nukes, as it’s mutually assured destruction, they’d get wiped off the map too.
 
Israel won’t let off nukes, as it’s mutually assured destruction, they’d get wiped off the map too.
They would have to nuke every country surrounding it and wait for the radiation to cover them

It wont happen as you say - nuke Iran and someone else will step up. Its not like North Korea firing rockets from thousands of miles away either
 
Incredible to think that until now a bit of spliff was considered alongside heroin in law.
 
Following scenes of a militarised police force breaking up a peaceful protest in New York (a city with a Democratic Mayor, in a state with a Democratic Governor, in a country with a Democratic President), comes this from Congress.



Hopefully that fascist police state we're warned of with a Trump victory doesn't eventuate.
 
Following scenes of a militarised police force breaking up a peaceful protest in New York (a city with a Democratic Mayor, in a state with a Democratic Governor, in a country with a Democratic President), comes this from Congress.



Hopefully that fascist police state we're warned of with a Trump victory doesn't eventuate.

Absolute insanity.

Criticism of Israel's actions isn't inherently anti-semitic, end of.
 
Following scenes of a militarised police force breaking up a peaceful protest in New York (a city with a Democratic Mayor, in a state with a Democratic Governor, in a country with a Democratic President), comes this from Congress.
Freeze peach is ded.
 
I keep getting the feeling that there is some s**t going on behind the scenes. Someone is stirring this up beyond the usual demos. There is no decades of police violence and repression like what was underlying the BLM riots. This to blow up like a sudden storm.
Wouldn't surprised to see outsider players on both sides spurring some of the actions at hot spots like LA.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top