Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As much as I don’t love Cam Zurhaar, I think he is the forward type we should be looking at.
Averaging over a goal a game in the bottom team and kicked 3.3 yesterday so really could have had a day out.
North will 100% let him go via FA if they get a high enough compo.
I’d much prefer to have only 1 small in our forward line in Motlop, with Harry, Charlie, JSOS, EHollands and Zurhaar. Along with maybe CDurdin coming off the bench.
Correct.
First player is Jack Crisp.
Second player is David Cuningham.
Now I am not ever expecting any of how players to have the extremely fortunate run Crisp has had in terms of fitness and matches played. But what I would say is this, much of Collingwood's list seem to have a reasonably strong percentage here when it comes to their senior players.
My goodness, 30.2% of games played is ridiculously low for a player in their 9th season. Cuningham has only played 55 of 182 games within his AFL career so far. And I am sure there are a few others with a similar low percentage like his playing for us right now.
The question I ask is this. Where do we draw the line? When do we say enough is enough and no longer put our faith in players whose bodies are no longer cut for the game (or at least for our team)?
This may sound harsh. But the truth is that the likes of Cuningham, Marchbank and Martin are fast becoming liabilities. They are letting their teammates down. Of course they don't mean to do this, but I think it is time they truly begin to see things for what they are themselves. Their bodies have degenerated quicker than the others and they no longer seem cut out for the rigours of footy.
They are missing huge chunks of each season with some kind of injury. Muscles made of tissue paper or bones made of glass.
It is one thing to have injuries in a season. It is another thing to have the very same players injured year in, year out, with the club continuously having to carry them.
I think it is time come the end of the year to make the big calls. The club needs to take what may seem to appear as risks. Not just look at the S&C team but make the tough list changes with such injury-prone players. Not going to get anywhere further with them hanging around, only to see them once again sit on the sidelines indefinitely for a different reason every single year.
For mine a KPD is key for us, as we are in the window we need both a short and long term strategy. Long term we need to identify draft prospects, obviously, and others are better placed to judge those. Shorter term we have Sam Durdin at hand so let's find out if he can do the job, he's 27 so in a great age bracket but for most is a big question mark so let's find out.. Even shorter term to match the window we are in right now we could do worse than Jeremy McGovern, provided he stays healthy, and I believe would actually be gettable.
How have those two started their seasons this year? Where do they play?100% agree.....I'm still a fan of Durds even though he hasn't been able to recapture the form from a few years back. As disappointing as it was last night, if he had have slotted those goals in the last quarter, we'd be singing his praises - he misses the opportunities and people are sinking the boots in.
I've also seen enough of Owies - very limited skills and output - and at 27yo, I'm not holding out any hope.
I was banging on about during the draft last year, but would love another creative forward. Koen Sanchez was the one I was really impressed with during the U18 Champs - made the All Australian side - and Jack Callinan the other who fits the bill. Both are still there for the taking in the MSD.
For years everytime I watch Geelong I look at players I barely know and they are big boys.At the game yesterday it was obvious that a few of our smaller players are 'small' - by that I mean short or a light frame - O Hollands, Owies, Binns.
To my eye even Geelongs smaller brigade had strength whereas our guys are buffeted off the ball.
I'm a bit concerned we then bring in the Camporeale boys next year - are we too 'light' ??
From memory it's just the last year of their contract.How is the RFA status calculated?
Top 25% of earners on their club list. So top 11 names. Is it based solely on contract value in the year that they come off contract?
Speculation that Hayward will be on $750-800k. His last deal was a four year contract extension. If it was back-ended (likely given the forecast shedding of Buddy's contract), then he may have only been averaging $500k a year.
Ie. $400k+$400k+$400k+$800k = $500k yearly wage but RFA when coming out of contract?
This.Hopefully a Toby Bedford esq option bobs up as I doubt we'd have money for a big name like Bolton.
Darcy Jones was one I was hoping would continue to be deprived opportunity but it looks like that ship has sailed already he looked incredibleThis.
I’m praying Austin and co are on the case as we speak.
From memory it's just the last year of their contract.
I also just can't imagine the Swans would have signed him on a 700k+ deal when they did, he wasn't and still isn't that level of player and they rarely overpay for players outside of absolute stars.
Last year we baulked at the cost of Gresham and we missed out on fixing an area of need, I’m really hoping we can afford the $$$ this year to fix an area of need.
Zurhaar, Hayward or Ainsworth as a FA wouod really help us
Darcy Jones was one I was hoping would continue to be deprived opportunity but it looks like that ship has sailed already he looked incredible
The Swans will offer Heyward at least $650K at least per year to stay (remembering that the average wage is $440k). To get him to leave a successful club where he is well settled would cost you at least an extra $100K ( if you were the only bidder) and at least a 5 year deal. Not saying that he isn't worth it but we have to be a bit realistic about what the cost would be. It may depend on the progess that E. Hollands and Moir make this year as to what our appetite would be.Figured as much. So no need to assume he's gonna need an $800k offer.
He played 22 last yearMcGovern body is the issue though, hasn’t managed more than 15 games since 2019, the idea is sound but there me no point getting rid of 1-2 injury prone players, only to bring in another.
I'm just glad that after another year of mediocre output others finally seem to be coming around to the idea that our small forwards are genuine D graders. Miers, Close and Stengle completely torched us last night, what I wouldn't give for some quality like those 3.Only a very small group of us actually wanted Gresham. There was actually quite a lot of hostility when his name was even mentioned.
Will kick 30+ goals for the Bombers this year off a half forward flank, also providing plenty of presence at stoppages in the forward half.
Meanwhile we wait for our half forwards to return from injury to maybe play some AFL quality football for half a season.
Yep definitely agree that body could well be an issue but how he goes this season will be a good guide and only on fair and reasonable termsMcGovern body is the issue though, hasn’t managed more than 15 games since 2019, the idea is sound but there me no point getting rid of 1-2 injury prone players, only to bring in another.
Elijah Hollands is kicking over a goal a game as a half forward that we got for a 3rd round draft pick with a high ceiling that will be around for a decade. As opposed to Gresham, who would command $600k a year, and might put together 2 good seasons based on his output at the saints. I know which one I would ratherOnly a very small group of us actually wanted Gresham. There was actually quite a lot of hostility when his name was even mentioned.
Will kick 30+ goals for the Bombers this year off a half forward flank, also providing plenty of presence at stoppages in the forward half.
Meanwhile we wait for our half forwards to return from injury to maybe play some AFL quality football for half a season.
Elijah has been a fantastic pick up and I think will only continue to improve, brilliant stuff by Austin... but he's not a genuine small forward which is what we're crying out forElijah Hollands is kicking over a goal a game as a half forward that we got for a 3rd round draft pick with a high ceiling that will be around for a decade. As opposed to Gresham, who would command $600k a year, and might put together 2 good seasons based on his output at the saints. I know which one I would rather
The Swans will offer Heyward at least $650K at least per year to stay (remembering that the average wage is $440k). To get him to leave a successful club where he is well settled would cost you at least an extra $100K ( if you were the only bidder) and at least a 5 year deal. Not saying that he isn't worth it but we have to be a bit realistic about what the cost would be. It may depend on the progess that E. Hollands and Moir make this year as to what our appetite would be.