Roast The Rotten Stench of the AFC

[feenix67]

Reads like it happens by default though.

Perfect world it's a smooth, transparent process. None of those factors are synonymous with the AFL or the AFC.

 

[GreyCrow]

Giggity - survey time

''Tell us what you think ''

Oh I surely will

 

[Drugs Are Bad Mackay?]

Giggity - survey time

''Tell us what you think ''

Oh I surely will

...and another thing...

 

[CrowToon]

**** you AFC

 

[Drugs Are Bad Mackay?]

View attachment 2030883

**** you AFC

Bzzt

Boys Club is two words

They'll void your response

 

[CrowToon]

Bzzt

Boys Club is two words

They'll void your response

If I thought any of them could count to five I would've tried harder

 

[FR0GGY]

If I thought any of them could count to five I would've tried harder

It’s the reason nicks got a 2 year extension and not 5

 

[Scorpus]

View attachment 2030883

**** you AFC

I reckon they filter any negative answers straight into the trash so the higher ups don't have a sook

 

[CrowToon]

I reckon they filter any negative answers straight into the trash so the higher ups don't have a sook

Absolutely. And that will be why they will be chuffed for Phyllis, Gwen, Jill and the rest of the 'true supporters' when they hand over the survey prizes for throwback answers such as 'Proud, Inclusive, Uncompromising'

 

[Southerntakeover]

One of the answers for the 'why are you a member' question is "because I want to be a part of a successful organisation".

It took me like forty five minutes to stop laughing.

 

[n4sir]

I reckon they filter any negative answers straight into the trash so the higher ups don't have a sook

For some reason that reminds me of the clash jumper voting process when when we somehow wound up with the "Murder of Crows" option despite it being clearly the least popular. Coincidence?

 

[Scorpus]

For some reason that reminds me of the clash jumper voting process when when we somehow wound up with the "Murder of Crows" option despite it being clearly the least popular. Coincidence?

The good old days where the club's issues could be solved through bots

 

[Sanders]

One of the answers for the 'why are you a member' question is "because I want to be a part of a successful organisation".

It took me like forty five minutes to stop laughing.

I don’t know, want has many uses

I want all sorts of things!

 

[Southerntakeover]

I want all sorts of things!

kirky

 

[Sanders]

kirky

He specialises in what you don’t want

 

[1990crow]

I tell you there’s a rotten stench on the Adelaide Big Footy board, how many posters have disappeared now we are losing?

No Tools and Trolls posts?

I think a lot of people have just had enough.

 

[1990crow]

The good old days where the club's issues could be solved through bots

Can we ask the club to put up a poll of who should be our coach?

 

[George Kramer]

I think a lot of people have just had enough.

Until we have some wins and come running back

 

[Scorpus]

Can we ask the club to put up a poll of who should be our coach?

I would vote in that poll more times than there are people on this earth

 

[GreyCrow]

Until we have some wins and come running back

WHO would do that

 

[texanmike]

The things i would do to experience this jubilation.
Please AFC, stop pissing around.

 

[Slippery Pete]

View attachment 2030883

**** you AFC

 

[Crow_68]

Giggity - survey time

''Tell us what you think ''

Oh I surely will

Given my responses, not much chance of winning any prizes

Took great delight in ticking 'no chance to renew membership' (even though I will). Hopefully that will be the response they take note of.

 

[BACCS]

Comments I left for the club on that survey (this will go well for them lmao):

The club does not listen to its membership base, highlighted by Olsen and Silvers personally attacking Stephen Rowe in the Chairman's Function pre the Sydney game for comments that only reflected the wider feelings of the supporter base. Instead of attacking your supporter base, focus on winning close games and better developing the list by exposing players to AFL level earlier, instead of continually pumping games into clear below average AFL players over an extended period (Murphy, McHenry) or senior players out of form (ROB, Smith, Laird). There is no point in the team being 'young' when it contains players that are not up to the level.

Instead of accepting a senior coach with a winning record below 30% (a clear last in our clubs history) and who hasn't beaten Sydney, Essendon or Collingwood in his coaching tenure so far, develop some ruthlessness and make changes in key areas after it hasn't worked for 5 seasons. The decision to extend his contract after one game this season is the worst decision this club has made since the camp debacle. There is not one coach in AFL history that has come from such a poor winning record after 5 seasons to have any success, so why is the club wasting their time and the supporters time?

Unless anything changes with key personnel on and off field, there will be a major drop off in attendances at home games and a lot of longer serving members not renewing for 2025 and beyond. We are sick of this club continually trotting out the same cliches to the media and never actually actioning anything for meaningful change.

Oh, and for the 25 words or less bit at the end:

Stop accepting the results of a senior coach with a winning record that rivals Tony Shaw at Collingwood

 

[Scorpus]

I'm keen to fill out this survey but I don't think I've received a link