- Thread starter
- #101
Gone into hiding after the McAdam ruling, after realising how lucky sniper Pickett wasAnd the Melbourne supporters are all nothing to see here.
They'd be crying into their cheese plates had Baz done that to one of theirs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Gone into hiding after the McAdam ruling, after realising how lucky sniper Pickett wasAnd the Melbourne supporters are all nothing to see here.
They'd be crying into their cheese plates had Baz done that to one of theirs.
Was a no brainer for them to accept the penalty once they realised McAdam was being sent straight to the tribunal.Gone into hiding after the McAdam ruling, after realising how lucky sniper Pickett was
Gone into hiding after the McAdam ruling, after realising how lucky sniper Pickett was
Was a no brainer for them to accept the penalty once they realised McAdam was being sent straight to the tribunal.
Patrick Cripps won the 2022 Brownlow after this incident vs Ah Chee.
If anything, it was worse than McAdam's bump because the impact on Ah Chee involved more head than body, and Cripps left the ground to make contact.
Case closed. McAdam you are free to play.
Dees would be petitioning for a royal commission if the roles were reversed. Was actually kind of hilarious the cheers that rang across the ground when Kossie left the field. Shithouse form.I was there as a neutral. It was a disgusting act.
Add to that the Melbourne supporters nearby sooking it up everytime the sniper was booed and jeering that Baz deserved it.
Far out.
Pretty hard to argue with this.MRO grading checklist:
Does it involve a VFL team?
If no, is the player a superstar?
If no, KILL WITH FIRE
Did you watch that crows/gws game yesterday.. it wouldve been 50 degrees in the sun out on that oval..Don't even reckon Adelaide will miss McAdam and still beat us.
Yes. AgreeThey both should have been referred let’s be real
Dear AFLI'm thinking I will not turn up to this weekend's home game & going to send an email to AFL house that I have had enough of Christian & his BS inequity.
As someone who has attended Crows games since the initial game v Hawks, I'm becoming fed up with the AFL ruining our game
There needs to be criticism directed at the Dogs' medical team for not putting Smith through a concussion test. With the class action lawsuits taking place, it was complete and utter negligence to not go ahead with it regardless of whether he turned out ok.But McAdam is assessed as more severe because their doctors actually put Wehr through a concussion test? Why should the actions of the doctors determine how something is graded? Game is going nuts.
There needs to be criticism directed at the Dogs' medical team for not putting Smith through a concussion test. With the class action lawsuits taking place, it was complete and utter negligence to not go ahead with it regardless of whether he turned out ok.
People need to remember Cripps was found guilty and let off due to procedural justice not that he wasn’t guilty of it.
Isn't the fact that a concusion test wasn't undertaken when a player has been smashed in a front on contact to the head a major issue that needs investigating.Given the impact - both should have had mandatory concussion tests - it’s just idiotic
This is a horrible take. You're taking your misguided frustrations you've built up from the AFL and their match review process and using it to question the integrity of a medical team that - and this is just one example - told Tim English last year he wasn't playing senior football for over a month due to a concussion he suffered.There needs to be criticism directed at the Dogs' medical team for not putting Smith through a concussion test. With the class action lawsuits taking place, it was complete and utter negligence to not go ahead with it regardless of whether he turned out ok.
Put it this way - they’re not helping themselves from a legal viewpoint / duty of careIsn't the fact that a concusion test wasn't undertaken when a player has been smashed in a front on contact to the head a major issue that needs investigating.
What the actual F!!
The AFL is a joke on this. No test for Smith is a blatant failure of duty of care and the Pickett 2 weeks is just a complete farce
It should be a blanket rule that any contact to the head requires a concussion test, it would remove any grey area. Then the result of the concussion test determines the severity of the MRO findings.This is a horrible take. You're taking your misguided frustrations you've built up from the AFL and their match review process and using it to question the integrity of a medical team that - and this is just one example - told Tim English last year he wasn't playing senior football for over a month due to a concussion he suffered.
How about taking your frustrations out on the player that could very well have paralyzed another.