Richmond fans were 100% for Peter Wrights ban, they can't object to this at all.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Baker flying bump
- Thread starter Sarcoidevo
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Apr 17, 2010
- 7,929
- 11,355
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Except the tribunal agreed that Wright never an attempt at the ball, and agrees that Butler did
No, they made it clear if Essendon had challenged it they would of said he was contesting the ball.
Freddy Swift
Club Legend
How could Essendon challenge when Wright pled guilty and agreed he was never marking the ball?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He didn't Lawyers said the AFL's rules made it impossible to challenge so to plead guilty to whatever false claims the AFL was making for a lesser sentence. His plea had no relevance to anything other than limiting ban length.
- Jul 13, 2015
- 38,970
- 44,272
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
False claims? Would you says its a conspiracy ?
