
- Mar 25, 2019
- 18,383
- 35,593
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Owies was poo, Kennedy wanted to leaveI simply do not understand cutting depth like Owies and Kennedy out of the side, especially Kennedy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Supercoach Round 6 SC Talk - SC Trades ,//, AFL Fantasy Round 6 AF Talk - AF Trades
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Owies was poo, Kennedy wanted to leaveI simply do not understand cutting depth like Owies and Kennedy out of the side, especially Kennedy.
Is that true about Kennedy? I never saw any reports about that. Either way its a big yikes for the Blues for him to be wanting out, when you see the efforts from Thursday night there is no way Kennedy should be outside that 23...Owies was poo, Kennedy wanted to leave
Kennedy was playing half forward for us because Hewett and Cerra added more to the midfield.Is that true about Kennedy? I never saw any reports about that. Either way its a big yikes for the Blues for him to be wanting out, when you see the efforts from Thursday night there is no way Kennedy should be outside that 23...
I simply do not understand cutting depth like Owies and Kennedy out of the side, especially Kennedy.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
yeah hes the guy in the corner none of the Board and Footy Dept listens to when he says dont sign that bloke for 950k per year.Brian Cook still works at the club?
And you know this... How?yeah hes the guy in the corner none of the Board and Footy Dept listens to when he says dont sign that bloke for 950k per year.
GO Catters
Have you seen the Blues TPP and how they've gotten there?And you know this... How?
Have you?Have you seen the Blues TPP and how they've gotten there?
What did you pay Curnow?
I know.. you've got bigger crisis' to deal with.
GO Catters
Not damaging enough with ball in hand, or explosive enough, to replicated what Dangerfield has done in his 30s.Cripps had his prime wasted? Is he not still in his prime? Who's to say he doesn't play into his mid 30s!
Zorko is an elite ball user and plays a sweeping quarterback role, post midfield. What new role with Cripps play?Dayne Zorko going alright too these days. Single handedly saving my supercoach team from being an abomination
I don't really recall comparing Cripps to your figjam captain in that post sorry.Not damaging enough with ball in hand, or explosive enough, to replicated what Dangerfield has done in his 30s.
Fyfe in his 30s is a better template.
It's completely relevant though. I fear you're being delusional about what Cripps will bring over the next few years. He's slow and poorly skilled. One dimensional. Not good in an attacking sense but can't play as a rebounding sweeper either.I don't really recall comparing Cripps to your figjam captain in that post sorry.
I don't really recall comparing Cripps to your figjam captain sorry.
What he said it absolutely spot on though. Cant just insult and belittle every oppo player when truth bombs hit. I'm sure were in for a "Nicky" again now. At least most of us have the respect to praise Cripps' positives but see the shortcomings in his game and try and point them out without trying to windmill our dicksI don't really recall comparing Cripps to your figjam captain sorry.
Yeah I'd agree that Selwood a far better comparison than one of the most explosive athletes to ever play AFLI think the best comparison that I've come up with, is Selwood. Both players play/played an extreme 'crash and bash' style, that is mostly inside and winning hard ball. Sel played until he was 34, which is about where I see Cripps going to. Slowed down at around 32 though, as the amount of wear and tear that kind of play has, makes it harder to have the longevity of someone like Pendlebury.
Still in his prime now, but was genuinely surprised to see he's already hit 30.
Selwood is a better comparison. Much better field kick though and decision maker with ball in hand. He definitely slowed down the last couple of years and had his time on ground massively reduced.I think the best comparison that I've come up with, is Selwood. Both players play an extreme 'crash and bash' style, that is mostly inside and winning hard ball. Sel played until he was 34, which is about where I see Cripps going to. Slowed down at around 32 though, as the amount of wear and tear that kind of play has, makes it harder to have the longevity of someone like Pendlebury.
Still in his prime now, but was genuinely surprised to see he's already hit 30.
Truth bombs... Interesting way to put itWhat he said it absolutely spot on though. Cant just insult and belittle every oppo player when truth bombs hit. I'm sure were in for a "Nicky" again now. At least most of us have the respect to praise Cripps' positives but see the shortcomings in his game and try and point them out without trying to windmill our dicks
Is Cripps extremely explosive/agile, a long and damaging kick, capable up forward, highly skilled or an expert reader of the game? Some of these attributes are what kept Dangerfield, Selwood and Pendlebury at a high level for so long.Truth bombs... Interesting way to put it
It's completely relevant though. I fear you're being delusional about what Cripps will bring over the next few years. He's slow and poorly skilled. One dimensional. Not good in an attacking sense but can't play as a rebounding sweeper either.
Nah Cripps has been one of the best players in the comp over the last 3 years because he was tall and thats allIs Cripps extremely explosive/agile, a long and damaging kick, capable up forward, highly skilled or an expert reader of the game? Some of these attributes are what kept Dangerfield, Selwood and Pendlebury at a high level for so long.
Bont has more of these qualities than Cripps so is much more likely to play to a high level for the next handful of years.
**** me you're the only campaigner on here that cant see the forest for the trees sometimes and then piss yourself laughing at others that do. Were not saying shit to stir sometimesTruth bombs... Interesting way to put it
Is Cripps extremely explosive/agile, a long and damaging kick, capable up forward, highly skilled or an expert reader of the game? Some of these attributes are what kept Dangerfield, Selwood and Pendlebury at a high level for so long.
Bont has more of these qualities than Cripps so is much more likely to play to a high level for the next handful of years.
He's been a contested animal and a stoppage beast - absolutely no doubt about that.Geez I reckon you’re being harsh.
You don’t win 2 Brownlows and 4 AA’s without being an expert reader of the game. Come on.
As I said, if you actually posted anything unworthy of a laugh I'd respond to it fairly. Just like ShadowCats post above which I had no issue with. When you spend 99% of your time on here calling every Carlton player s*** there's really no reason I'd ever consider your opinion anything but partisan drivel. Exactly the same as I assume you perceive most of my posts.**** me you're the only campaigner on here that cant see the forest for the trees sometimes and then piss yourself laughing at others that do. Were not saying shit to stir sometimes
Old fossil dick proved that for us against these legends last ThursdayHe's been a contested animal and a stoppage beast - absolutely no doubt about that.
Expert reader of the game requires a bit more, i.e the nous to win the footy, hurt the opposition and defend once that contested ability isn't at its peak. Think Pendlebury, Black, S.Mitchell.