He has a test average that everyone could only dream of.
Fact is it has been achieved, as brilliantly as he has bowled, almost entirely on favourable surfaces with a couple of exceptions, across a sample size of 13 matches, 3 countries (one of which he went wicketless in, the other of which he averages 48 in) while Josh Hazlewood has earned his over a sample size of nearly 80 tests and has four countries where he averages mid-20s or less and another couple where he has managed a respectable 32 (India and Sri Lanka).
Boland has done an absolutely exceptional job. That can’t be argued.
But that’s not ‘equality’ or ‘superiority’ yet.
For all of the talk about Bumrah, Boland has a better bowling average and 50 wickets is not a small sample size