Mid draft next year for Sourdough could be the most ambiguous thing I’ve seen written.. draft might be 55 (27) players or 75 (37), recent history suggest somewhere in the middle but then he goes on to suggest a going rate of pick 40-50
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Think they are saying his management are demanding the dogs let him go. Not driving a hard bargain with us. Get one back for stiffing us with coffeild last yeari dont get the Macrae bit...why would he drive a hard bargain after saying he wants a trade to the saints???
Same b/s , the guy has totally lost faith in the management of the team - coaches etc and just wants out - Beverage wouldn't care if he left so keeping a player who wants out and saying they are going to drive a hard bargain is a joke.What does it mean when it says “Macrae and his management are prepared to drive a hard bargain on a trade….”?
Confused here.St Kilda is unwilling to part with its No. 43 draft pick for Jackson Macrae, hopeful of securing the triple All Australian with a back-end pick.
They will offer a third or fourth-round pick for Macrae, the player of the 2021 finals series.
They will likely offer a mid-draft future pick for Ivan Soldo, and could end up trading their future second pick with the Power’s future third pick.
The Power paid the world for Soldo when he left Richmond.
But the trade value of mid-tier rucks is usually about pick 40-50 and he is due around $500,000 for each of the next two seasons, so they would let him go given Dante Visentini is a solid back-up.
The Power will secure Gold Coast’s Jack Lukosius on a deal rival contender Adelaide believes is seven years at $1 million a season.
Salary dump , was a very good player but now looking how they have treated him he has past his used by date.Confused here.
Isn’t 43 a third round pick?
Anyway, glad we’re not going to be pushovers on either deal hopefully.
I don't think it matters, but I suspect 43 will be a third round pick once all the father/sons, academy picks are put into the system.Confused here.
Isn’t 43 a third round pick?
Anyway, glad we’re not going to be pushovers on either deal hopefully.
I agree. But look at the 2 lines I posted in bold…Salary dump , was a very good player but now looking how they have treated him he has past his used by date.
Will be a throw away pick.
Exactly 43 is a 3rd.I agree. But look at the 2 lines I posted in bold…
First it’s says they are unwilling to give up pick 43.
A few sentences later they’ll offer round 3 or 4? Well isn’t that pick 43?
And let Spider go.Came from Port. Paid appalling overs for him to play a handful of games
Luke was a good polished player before injuries but Judd was a whole another level mate do you not remember how good he was at west coast absolute jett match winnerLuke Ball without OP may have been up there with Juddy.
I believe you can apply for AFL exception based on the number of first rounders you have had.Unfortunately if we cough up a later future pick we can’t use our future first. Do we have some kind of trade capital - pushing someone out? Is there any chance Membrey can still get us the lowest FA compo - is it end 2nd or end 3rd?
I agree. But look at the 2 lines I posted in bold…
First it’s says they are unwilling to give up pick 43.
A few sentences later they’ll offer round 3 or 4? Well isn’t that pick 43?
I don’t have the picks infront of me. But you would imagine on draft night 43 comes in to a late second or close toExactly 43 is a 3rd.
Another shit article
It is. This is all made up bullshit anyway. That pick 43 will likely drop to late 30s by the time the time all the academy stuff is over with and considering the depth of this draft there will be some quality players available at that pick for sure. Dogs will take that and be very happy they can front load contracts next year as Darcy/Ugle Hagen etc.. are going to be demanding big bucks very soon.Confused here.
Isn’t 43 a third round pick?
Anyway, glad we’re not going to be pushovers on either deal hopefully.
Exactly. Reidy and Knobel at Freo, Bryant and Vigo V. at Dons, Moyle at Suns are 5 juniors I'd enquire about. State league otherwiseIf we are looking for a 2nd ruck surely they can find someone better.
Fremantle are stacked with young rucks - and have 2 with no contract (Knobel , Jones) and Reidy has a yr left.
So no way will we give that up for McRae. Or at all, it appears.I believe you can apply for AFL exception based on the number of first rounders you have had.
See Port Adelaide last 2 years.
I don’t have the picks infront of me. But you would imagine on draft night 43 comes in to a late second or close to
By my quick look. P39 is the start of the third round.So no way will we give that up for McRae. Or at all, it appears.
Need to hold our line like we did with Crouch.
Take it or leave it.
I’d be more than happy for us to flog off a future first for another pick in this years first round
A. I’d back us to finish higher than we did this year
B. If we snagged 3 first rounders , a second rounder and change in this draft I’d say we are ready to hit free agency next year
Draft hard this year .. attack free agency hard next year
Suns @ 12 or Giants @ 14 are the ones we are looking at.
check out the number of academy kids at the Swans Lions Suns & GiantsNo-one will swap a first from this year with a first from next year, without something to sweeten the deal ( for them ).
Only case would be to offload a first when they have an early academy pick.
Richmond are going to end up with a bunch of top 20 picks. They might be willing to push one (mid teens) into next year for our first.Really love this idea and hope we’re putting it in motion.
Our F1 is probably ‘perceived’ as 4-10. I’d be happy trading it to GWS for their P15 this year. Backing us to bounce with a tap ruckman and someone who can exit stoppage cleanly, will make a massive difference stopping bleeding and ability to set up the ground not to mention quick decent entries.
GC probably dealing with Carlton who want Houston so think we’re more of a shot at GWS pick.
GWS will have a Vic country lad lined up and probably still get him at 20 (B2-Perryman) so would think they would be agreeable given they could think they’re getting a top 5 pick next year.
Could be an amazing off season;
1. J. Macrae (Trade)
2. I. Soldo (Trade)
3. S. Lalor (7)
4. M. Reid/S. Draper (8)
5. C. Hynes (15)
6. O. Hannerford (25)
7. Slider/Trade/Points (43)
8. Cole (R)
9. Hofmann (R)
10. Peckett (R)
Maybe we wouldn’t draft 5 mids and there are some great KPP about too for one of our picks but really can’t go wrong having more picks inside 20
Really love this idea and hope we’re putting it in motion.
Our F1 is probably ‘perceived’ as 4-10. I’d be happy trading it to GWS for their P15 this year. Backing us to bounce with a tap ruckman and someone who can exit stoppage cleanly, will make a massive difference stopping bleeding and ability to set up the ground not to mention quick decent entries.
GC probably dealing with Carlton who want Houston so think we’re more of a shot at GWS pick.
GWS will have a Vic country lad lined up and probably still get him at 20 (B2-Perryman) so would think they would be agreeable given they could think they’re getting a top 5 pick next year.
Could be an amazing off season;
1. J. Macrae (Trade)
2. I. Soldo (Trade)
3. S. Lalor (7)
4. M. Reid/S. Draper (8)
5. C. Hynes (15)
6. O. Hannerford (25)
7. Slider/Trade/Points (43)
8. Cole (R)
9. Hofmann (R)
10. Peckett (R)
Maybe we wouldn’t draft 5 mids and there are some great KPP about too for one of our picks but really can’t go wrong having more picks inside 20