Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So the lowest number of inside fifties of the preseason round, with 5 teams being outscored by Hawthorn isn't improving on one of the lowest scoring efficiencies for score per inside 50 last season isn't concrete evidence that things have improved in that area of the ground.I hope that we have, and expect to see evidence of it over the next half of a season. But we've no concrete evidence so far in a setting that actually means something. I get where he's coming from.
Mitchell listed as a test yet 4-6 weeks on the Hawthorn site.Chads been changed to TBC?View attachment 1920882
Pick an extreme or take a hike.I would suggest that one pre-season game where we had 34 inside 50s is neither grounds for alarm nor confidence regarding our forward line structure.
I'm not 'more' worried or 'more' reassured than I was a week ago.
I'm not sure I really belong on BigFooty...
Nup. Not proof to me until we do it in the real stuff. We barely played a quarter of proper football last week. It's a big difference when the season starts.So the lowest number of inside fifties of the preseason round, with 5 teams being outscored by Hawthorn isn't improving on one of the lowest scoring efficiencies for score per inside 50 last season isn't concrete evidence that things have improved in that area of the ground.
Yep - agree with this.I would suggest that one pre-season game where we had 34 inside 50s is neither grounds for alarm nor confidence regarding our forward line structure.
I'm not 'more' worried or 'more' reassured than I was a week ago.
(I'm not sure I really belong on BigFooty...)
I would just wait for the Hawthorn injury update...I thought there may have been one this week, but maybe only when we play.When CJ 'apparently" suffered a Medium grade hamstring strain at the club Intra club match, it was announced that he was looking at 6 to 8 weeks. That was five weeks ago. The media is now telling us that he will be missing either 4 to 6 weeks or 6 to 8 weeks depending on the media source. Now, depending on which source is correct CJ will have missed either 9 weeks, 11 weeks or 13 weeks for a medium-grade hamstring strain! FFS-it was a hamstring strain, not a PCL- or have we not been told what he really suffered?
Whatever happened to the mandatory three-week hamstring injury?
not even three weeks yet mate.When CJ 'apparently" suffered a Medium grade hamstring strain at the club Intra club match, it was announced that he was looking at 6 to 8 weeks. That was five weeks ago...
Not even 2 weeksnot even three weeks yet mate.
When CJ 'apparently" suffered a Medium grade hamstring strain at the club Intra club match, it was announced that he was looking at 6 to 8 weeks. That was five weeks ago. The media is now telling us that he will be missing either 4 to 6 weeks or 6 to 8 weeks depending on the media source. Now, depending on which source is correct CJ will have missed either 9 weeks, 11 weeks or 13 weeks for a medium-grade hamstring strain! FFS-it was a hamstring strain, not a PCL- or have we not been told what he really suffered?
Whatever happened to the mandatory three-week hamstring injury?
But it is a leap year, so don’t we have to triple everything or something?Not even 2 weeks
Actually my mistake. I was thinking it was first Dogs game not the intraclub. So it is more than 2 weeks. Still less than 3 thoughBut it is a leap year, so don’t we have to triple everything or something?
If memory serves, in the early clarko years he was much more attackign then brought in the more defensive side of the game at a later dateWe can only use the data in front of us. We would be hard-pressed to find someone who doesn't argue Sammy is more attacking that Clarko was, especially in Clarksons last four or so years. The pre-season supports that observation. I cautiously agree but will not mortgage my house over it.
Yeah, my Wednesday was like that, too.Day unsurprising but extraordinarily disappointing.
In his early years Clarko deployed a gameplan that had supporters burning their memberships, he was not an attacking coach at the beginning of his tenure with the club.If memory serves, in the early clarko years he was much more attackign then brought in the more defensive side of the game at a later date
Most were older players with injury history , so not a great combo for that.Idk who does our injury reports but I can remember Richmond fans having real angst towards Peter Burge a few years back when everyone was popping up with hammys that would be reported as 3 then stretch to 6. Prestia etc
Not sure what you are talking about? We tried to run and move the ball by hand but took a few years to gel in combo with the cluster. Given we made finals in his 3rd year and flag in 4th (including a forward who kicked 100+ goals) what early years are you talking about?In his early years Clarko deployed a gameplan that had supporters burning their memberships, he was not an attacking coach at the beginning of his tenure with the club.
Not sure what you are talking about? We tried to run and move the ball by hand but took a few years to gel in combo with the cluster. Given we made finals in his 3rd year and flag in 4th (including a forward who kicked 100+ goals) what early years are you talking about?
I was at that game (was before I moved across to Melbourne).Saints mega-flood game at the 'G, what year was that? 06?
google says 07, Ross Lyon. I thought it was Grant Thomas. there you go.