tigs2010
Pick 1...
I don't think Whitlock goes in there as we got the pick for Rioli. Rioli & F2 for Smillie & 4ish.So Rioli, Whitlock and F2, for Smillie and ~pick 4
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I don't think Whitlock goes in there as we got the pick for Rioli. Rioli & F2 for Smillie & 4ish.So Rioli, Whitlock and F2, for Smillie and ~pick 4
That's incredible business considering Smillie was a top 10 picks in pretty much everyone's mock draft. Basically 2 top 10 picks for Rioli and a F2.I don't think Whitlock goes in there as we got the pick for Rioli. Rioli & F2 for Smillie & 4ish.
Smillie was #1 or 2 for half a year until it became unpopular to like him.That's incredible business considering Smillie was a top 10 picks in pretty much everyone's mock draft. Basically 2 top 10 picks for Rioli and a F2.
Yeah I was being conservative. Realistically it's 2 top 5 picks, possibly 2 top 2 picks lol.Smillie was #1 or 2 for half a year until it became unpopular to like him.
moreover a copy RFC league..Sheedy @ the bummers copied Hafey in a sense,to his credit he Sheedy did revolutionize the swingman,no no hang on a minnie, Hafes was doin that with Barry Richardson 10 years b4 Sheeds,then of courseI agree. If we pull this off, others will surely follow. It's a copycat league.
Whitlock is part of the cost side of the equation though. Well, Whitlock or 23.I don't think Whitlock goes in there as we got the pick for Rioli. Rioli & F2 for Smillie & 4ish.
But we gained 23 on opposite side to Rioli & then spent it. Should be on both sides of equation.Whitlock is part of the cost side of the equation though. Well, Whitlock or 23.
Originally, Rioli = 6 & 23
Then 23 & F2 = Norf's F1
The total cost of acquiring Smillie & Norf's F1 was Rioli, 23 & F2
Either way we made out like bandits.But we gained 23 on opposite side to Rioli & then spent it. Should be on both sides of equation.
Rioli for 6 &23
F2 &23for F1
Rioli & F2 for 6 & F1
That's the whole point, "we spent it"But we gained 23 on opposite side to Rioli & then spent it. Should be on both sides of equation.
Rioli for 6 &23
F2 &23for F1
Rioli & F2 for 6 & F1
hottons rich campaigners ah
fmd
But in terms of what we got for Rioli we got 6 & 23 and converted 23 into something else. All we did was change the value of 23. The F2 wasn't gained in the Rioli trade so has to be added into the outgoing.That's the whole point, "we spent it"
Just because we gained 23 it doesn't cancel out the fact that it was used in the trade for F1.
The trade for F1 was 23 + F2 for F1, say we gained that F2 from a previous trade, does that cancel it out in the cost of getting that F1? No, of course it doesn't, because that logic would have us acquiring F1 for nothing.
100% this would have been a consideration when putting draftees side by side. A lot of melts about Allen. He had strong go home factor so we went for the local. Having a group of guys that are already mates is huge for culturewatching all the club videos of the draftees and i do have to say i got a little bit emotional watching these kids most of them are mates and played together you can already see a bond and we will not have any go home factors or will they be enticed by other clubs to leave
we have drafted very smartly i believe this will make our rebuild go faster and exciting
We are definitely prioritising good kids and team players which is good. That’s how our precious success was built and we are trying it again
do we have any academy kids or f and s next year?Yeh was noticeable all drafted are good kids, love a tackle, have some mongrel and high upside (but come with risk).
We've got so much flexibility moving forward now to draft just the really top rated mids/outside players now the spine is hopefully there.
Really liked that we only have potentially pick 1 and another top 5 pick next year - it's reportedly shallow draft and full of academy players + whatever FA (and fingers crossed more end of 1st round compo for finishing with less than 4 wins). If we want to trade back in then we can use futures again which are heavily diluted with Tassie.
Yes, we absolutely did convert 23 to something else and isn't it glorious?But in terms of what we got for Rioli we got 6 & 23 and converted 23 into something else. All we did was change the value of 23. The F2 wasn't gained in the Rioli trade so has to be added into the outgoing.
Either way we made out like bandits.