List Mgmt. 2024 Draft - Post Trade Period Edition

[sregit]

The thing is there was no better deal available

Only other thing we could have done was to use the picks in getting deals done for Rioli , Bolton & Baker
which we didnt need to do in the end and received the best possible result without the picks

If we still held the picks all we would have been doing is trying to off load them by using the picks to move up some of the later picks which really wouldn't have been possible either.

Sure i think we also over paid slightly at the time thinking why did we need to involve #32 but when the Melbourne news broke and they had 1600+ points on the table it all made sense on why we had to pay 2000 points

So if Melbourne did the deal, then they couldn’t do the Essendon deal.

 

[THE_GUN]

So if Melbourne did the deal, then they couldn’t do the Essendon deal.

Thats Correct

Melbourne would have #5 + #20 and still have their F1
Bombers would have to look for another team that might have been St Kilda but most likely GWS

 

[lizard man]

Do you think if we recruited lalor that we would put him on a vegan diet to slim him down a bit

 

[bigstyletiger]

Do you think if we recruited lalor that we would put him on a vegan diet to slim him down a bit

If he can do the running in preseason I think he will slim down.

 

[tigerfan1961]

Looking like St Kilda / NorF trade happening
Saints have #7 +F1 for NorF's #2 +F2 on the table now

I’d be surprised as why would we bother talking to Port and the Giants if they’d moved on?

 

[THE_GUN]

Do you think if we recruited lalor that we would put him on a vegan diet to slim him down a bit

Wont need to as the kid has never done a pre season he will trim down beautifully after 6 months pre season at Richmond alongside taranto

 

[GoTigers2015]

Yeah, you see, I do not think 8 is equal to 15+16.

Do not think GWS give up 15+16 for Pick 8.

What if it is 16+21

8 to GWs for 16+21
7+16 to nth for 2
saints 2+21 to the draft?

West Coast fans mentioned GWS knocked back trading up for pick 3 with 15 and 16 which suggest they will stick with their picks. More likely to trade out a pick for a F1.

 

[Calcium Man]

Looking like St Kilda / NorF trade happening
Saints have #7 +F1 for NorF's #2 +F2 on the table now

Where is this from?

 

[Calcium Man]

West Coast fans mentioned GWS knocked back trading up for pick 3 with 15 and 16 which suggest they will stick with their picks. More likely to trade out a pick for a F1.

really?

It makes sense to me for GWS to go with 3 kids on cost controlled contracts. They have lots of high end talent, a tight salary cap and right in their window.

 

[Rockridge]

Carlton traded up to pick 3 for Draper , they are not interested in FOS or anyone else at pick 3

 

[GoTigers2015]

 

[GoTigers2015]

really?

It makes sense to me for GWS to go with 3 kids on cost controlled contracts. They have lots of high end talent, a tight salary cap and right in their window.

 

[GoTigers2015]

Saints won't be able to trade 7 or 8 with a deal with GWS if they have already knocked back pick 3

 

[Calcium Man]

View attachment 2156651

I thought their plan was F1s for Warner?

 

[GoTigers2015]

Makes sense that Richmond would want to keep 6 and trade up to 2 via other means.

FOS and Lalor are not pure midfielders and to be able to snare one Jagga/Langford/Smillie or Draper would set the midfield up for 15 years.

 

[GoTigers2015]

I thought their plan was F1s for Warner?

They can use their 2026 and 2027 F1s. Was not by design they got the Hawks F1, so can see them trading back.
No club would want to trade out of the first 15 picks.

 

[avengers]

My draft wish list has changed since doing more research.

2 of Lalor, Langford and Hynes would be nice! Tall mid/forwards that can mark and kick goals and also seem to play with a bit of aggression.
Then an aggressive tall forward who can develop under lynch, a key defender and a classy mid (Lindsay ideally). I’d also like to take Hotton.

take 6 picks, trade out at least 2 into next year.

 

[richoatthedisco]

Where is this from?

His active fantasy world.

 

[C4[2]Yo`DooR]

Richmond don’t want to deal pick 6 or 24 in any trades.

Edit.

 

[Al Heimer]

We just dont have to or need to trade with anyone for anything. End of story!

On SM-A426B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[blaisee]

Richmond don’t want to deal pick 6 or 20 in any trades.

So 10+11 maybe traded, but Pick 20 is a no?

 

[Mr Magic]

So 10+11 maybe traded, but Pick 20 is a no?

there is something about pick 20

 

[C4[2]Yo`DooR]

there is something about pick 20

Sorry, I meant to say 24.

First pick of the second round. Which is what some clubs specifically want.

 

[Tygrys]

Just go to the draft with pick 2. Take best available which you will and it will be another midfielder..which doesn't address your key position problems...if you were keen on taking Tauru at 2 you wouldn't be offering the pick up ..
Rawlings has stuffed up here and you know it .. personally I'd prefer to keep our picks as is as I think the top 7 players are pretty even and we'll get 2 of them regardless ...another thing I'd personally like is if you half dozen roo supporters pissed off to St failures board and pestered them for awhile about how much you would like them to pay for a pick they haven't asked for

This is their one magical moment of relevancy. Having draft picks (either from being crap or being gifted to them by the AFL) is the only time Norf has gravitas. Obviously they don’t want to waste it

But yeah them demanding the world from other clubs to resolve a problem of their own making is kind of funny albeit tedious. Personally I hope they are forced to keep pick 2.

 

[Sir_Loin]

If we’re going for 1,2,6 has to be Lalor, FOS, Smith

I’d rather Langford in those picks. Anyway let’s see how it goes