Player Watch #15: Dylan Stephens

[Colby2Sheez]

I don't see how you can say he doesn't suit the sub role when his best performance for us came as a sub.

One pretty good performance being the sub doesn't define the best role he can offer us.

I'd use others as sub before him knowing sustained hard running is his best asset.

 

[Passmore]

Can we just throw him overboard?

Sent from my SM-A908B using Tapatalk

 

[Frank Thring]

If he plays, we lose

 

[Heaps of fun]

One pretty good performance being the sub doesn't define the best role he can offer us.

I'd use others as sub before him knowing sustained hard running is his best asset.

His best role is VFL but at least he has shown something as sub.

 

[Colby2Sheez]

His best role is VFL but at least he has shown something as sub.

Agree he is not AFL standard.

Agree to disagree on sub use, no probs.

 

[King Corey]

If he plays, we lose

So we did draft him in 2019 as I originally hoped afterall? He just didn't appear on the list for another 4 years.

 

[Colby2Sheez]

So we did draft him in 2019 as I originally hoped afterall? He just didn't appear on the list for another 4 years.

The contract length for an unwanted player at a rival club is really quite astonishing.

Our recent acquisitions outside Danie all have me very concerned on what we are doing and why.

 

[chubbspeterson]

The contract length for an unwanted player at a rival club is really quite astonishing.

Our recent acquisitions outside Danie all have me very concerned on what we are doing and why.

Well you either do nothing and just hit the draft or you take whoever is willing to come to the club at the time.
We won't be getting better targets than Daniel until the team seriously improves.

 

[Makeshift Park]

If we’re going with merit based selections, he was better than RHJ, Scott and Phillips in the short amount of time he had today.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

That effort at half back. He wanted no part of that.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[The Nostradamus]

If we’re going with merit based selections, he was better than RHJ, Scott and Phillips in the short amount of time he had today.

100%
Came on provided run and carry and had an impact

 

[the big lebowski]

100%
Came on provided run and carry and had an impact

Run carry and then smothered kick

 

[koshari]

If we’re going with merit based selections, he was better than RHJ, Scott and Phillips in the short amount of time he had today.

Sure he was but where do you start him?

Back on scotts wing after scott was one of the best last week?

Phillips midfield rotation?

Or try him as a small fwd?

Bit of a selection dilemma.

 

[Passmore]

If we’re going with merit based selections, he was better than RHJ, Scott and Phillips in the short amount of time he had today.

Would have to agree. It’s time he has a full game to sink or swim.

 

[Lomas]

Would have to agree. It’s time he has a full game to sink or swim.

I really want him to work out, but agree.

 

[Lomas]

Sure he was but where do you start him?

Back on scotts wing after scott was one of the best last week?

Phillips midfield rotation?

Or try him as a small fwd?

Bit of a selection dilemma.

Can’t pressure as a small forward, or as a mid.

 

[hellas_johnny]

Keep him as the sub. Has been closest good each time he's been subbed in and last year vs Melbourne last year. We need a sub that can make an impact so far he has

 

[Makeshift Park]

Sure he was but where do you start him?

Back on scotts wing after scott was one of the best last week?

Phillips midfield rotation?

Or try him as a small fwd?

Bit of a selection dilemma.

Just get him to do RHJ’s role and Scott’s when he rotates back.

He’s got the skills, and his running is best in class.

Scott rotates back a lot anyway.

Ie make RHJ sub next week instead

 

[koshari]

Just get him to do RHJ’s role and Scott’s when he rotates back.

He’s got the skills, and his running is best in class.

Scott rotates back a lot anyway.

Ie make RHJ sub next week instead

Given he has like a 4 year deal need to find some role for him. Perpetual sub probably doesnt cut it.

I actually think he sort of turned the corner late last year. But going to need a bit of continuity. But calls from some he has mountains more courage than bobby dazzler are a bit of a stretch.

Neither of them are the second coming of glenn archer or schwatta.

 

[ferball]

If we’re going with merit based selections, he was better than RHJ, Scott and Phillips in the short amount of time he had today.

His softness cost us multiple goals in the last quarter.

Was as bad as anything RHJ or Kerch did.

 

[RightWingRoo]

Kicked his first North goal today.

Seems as though the sub role suits him. We've struggled to find anyone who can impact in the role, and with his tank he can play out the last quarter without needing a rotation.

 

[Hazey1977]

That effort at half back. He wanted no part of that.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Was that the one with Tucker and McKercher were they all panicked and turned it over?

On SM-A556E using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[amaz199]

I thought he showed some dash and speed. Seemed to be lively when he came on and kicked his first goal too.

 

[The Butcher]

Like my teacher sis who copped a death threat the other day, no joke, he was hesitant to upset the OPPO. No shame, he just needs to get his people situated in a secure local then watch out. Have you ever seen a cat on full blown attack? Fluff gonna fly.. and word is we never clipped his claws. Ahahahahaaa WATCHOUT! DAMAGING is his preferred pronoun.

 

[My Left Foote]

Like my teacher sis who copped a death threat the other day, no joke, he was hesitant to upset the OPPO. No shame, he just needs to get his people situated in a secure local then watch out. Have you ever seen a cat on full blown attack? Fluff gonna fly.. and word is we never clipped his claws. Ahahahahaaa WATCHOUT! DAMAGING is his preferred pronoun.