Traded Massimo D'Ambrosio [Traded to Hawthorn for #61 and F4 (Pies)]

Remove this Banner Ad

Provided clubs have had their chance to pass by the time your player get's selected(Can't say I've paid any attention to the Hawks FS/Academy this year). Probably wont come quite that high.
But ultimately we'd have no use for it, so I neither scenario makes a shred of difference for us.
Depends on our father sons nominations and if they’re bidded on.

We have Will McCabe and Calsher Dear.
 
Because just like the AFL, there are rules the equivalent of Travis Clokes smoke and shadows behind the windows. Seems because you offered him a rookie contract as a rookie in his second year if he refuses he’s a DFA. Thank god, pick 63 is safe!
Do it. It just opens the door for return fire when the shoes on the other foot.
 
Do it. It just opens the door for return fire when the shoes on the other foot.
Come on man, Dodo 🦤 doesn’t hold back he sinks the boots 🥾 very trade deal, it will make no difference!

Look at poor old Zerk-Thatcher out of contract and still can’t get home.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Do it. It just opens the door for return fire when the shoes on the other foot.
I’m confused how are you firing with your foot? Dont worry hawks don’t go to your club unless we’ve got the best of out them first (Salmon, Williams, Grimley…😂). Grimley got me a huge footy grid score as a dons player in the 2010s
 
I’m confused how are you firing with your foot? Dont worry hawks don’t go to your club unless we’ve got the best of out them first (Salmon, Williams, Grimley…😂). Grimley got me a huge footy grid score as a dons player in the 2010s
You do realize Salmon played over 200 games for us and kicked over 500 goals, right?
 
That’s okay we got your first round pick for a busted Williams whose knees were shot! We got the best of him in 2008!
You didn't get the FRP, Port did. We essentially traded Williams and 24 for Jay Nash and 16 (who would have been delisted anyway)
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Do it. It just opens the door for return fire when the shoes on the other foot.
Serious response. What are we doing wrong? We aren’t walking him to the PSD. The situation is free agency. He is a rookie on your list where you have the chance to retain him with an offer to upgrade to the senior list. You offered a rookie contract which he rejected which changes his status to a UFA. We take him as a UFA and the offer won’t trigger compo. So I ask again what are we doing wrong?
 
Serious response. What are we doing wrong? We aren’t walking him to the PSD. The situation is free agency. He is a rookie on your list where you have the chance to retain him with an offer to upgrade to the senior list. You offered a rookie contract which he rejected which changes his status to a UFA. We take him as a UFA and the offer won’t trigger compo. So I ask again what are we doing wrong?
Ok I don’t think Bigfooty is the place for serious responses 😂😂😂 but here goes.. You’re not doing anything wrong. It’s just super low priority for Essendon at the moment. They have other deals to do before doing a trade for a pick they won’t use or need. Offering pick in the 60s isn’t going to get it pushed up the priority list. However something as been put up here is pick 35 and Massimo for pick 33 gets it done in the first 5 minutes tomorrow otherwise if it’s a pick in the 60s it gets done in the last hour for tv purposes
 
Last edited:
Serious response. What are we doing wrong? We aren’t walking him to the PSD. The situation is free agency. He is a rookie on your list where you have the chance to retain him with an offer to upgrade to the senior list. You offered a rookie contract which he rejected which changes his status to a UFA. We take him as a UFA and the offer won’t trigger compo. So I ask again what are we doing wrong?
The Free Agency period has finished though

Youve missed that boat
 

Traded Massimo D'Ambrosio [Traded to Hawthorn for #61 and F4 (Pies)]


Write your reply...
Back
Top