The official 2024 NBA Playoffs thread - no tankers allowed

Who you got in 2024?

  • Boston - Billy King's gaffe has to payoff sometime

    Votes: 11 30.6%
  • Denver - it might be located at altitude, but jumping is overrated

    Votes: 10 27.8%
  • Milwaukee - I have faith in Doc Rivers

    Votes: 2 5.6%
  • New York - it turns out Thibs was the hero NY needed

    Votes: 3 8.3%
  • OKC - after stealing a franchise, stealing a title is nothing

    Votes: 4 11.1%
  • Minnesota - Winter is coming

    Votes: 3 8.3%
  • Phoenix - Luxury tax? What luxury tax?

    Votes: 1 2.8%
  • Clippers - The world needs a Harden vs Morey postscipt

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lakers - Never bet against the whistle

    Votes: 1 2.8%
  • Other

    Votes: 1 2.8%

  • Total voters
    36
  • This poll will close: .

Remove this Banner Ad

So I'm guessing Knicks fans won't be putting Embiid in their trade machine dreams anymore?

Unrelated news, Blood in the Garden is a great yarn for those in need of a book club idea.
I also expect the same Knick fans that were calling Philly fans sooks for the 4 missed calls in the last 2 minutes of game two are totally accepting of the refs decisions yesterday.
 
He's not obliged to take less, but he should consider it if he wants to make the most of his remaining pro years.

Taking less for the good of the franchise is a different matter altogether. That's more along the lines of whether athletes are overpaid, in which case most people would probably agree they should be paid commensurate to the value they provide.

In basketball terms though, there's definitely an argument. Players do do that, albeit often only in certain circumstances. To use some Warriors examples, David West took minimum contracts his last three years in the league with the Spurs and Dubs because he wanted to win, even though he could undoubtedly made more elsewhere. Ditto Otto Porter and Bjelica from your 2022 championship team, albeit in Porter's case it might have been a calculated gamble to rebuild his value.

Now LeBron is in a different category from those guys, but the basic idea is the same. Nobody argues that he's not worth $40-50 mil annually to the league or the Lakers from a financial POV - in fact he's underpaid in that respect. But in terms of the Lakers being a championship contender, it's definitely something to think about.

It's hard to work out the numbers this far away from July, but his player option next season is for $51.4 million. Now if he took say $10-15 mil less for next season, I don't think it would necessarily enable them to offer a third star a hefty contract, although you never know with enough trading. But if they traded away Gabe Vincent, LeBron taking slightly less might mean the difference between them being able to offer the full MLE - annual salary roughly $12.9 million - rather than just the taxpayer MLE, which comes in at only $5.2 million.

What that in turn means is that it might mean the difference between signing a player like KCP, Tyus Jones, Gary Trent, Buddy Hield, Royce O'Neale, Tobias Harris, Isaiah Hartenstein or Caleb Martin, or on the other hand being limited to adding a player like Eric Gordon or Mason Plumlee. It's not foolproof - using their MLE on Vincent last offseason is proof enough of that. But it is something, especially when the Lakers are limited in utilising other avenues to improve the roster, as people have already pointed out.

There's obvious plusses if he takes less, but the way people go on about it all the time is stupid. LeBron deserves whatever money he can get. He's underpaid if anything.

I've never once heard anyone say the same about Steph.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Caitlin Clark every time the camera is on her

Blank Face Space GIF by Kevin Carter
 
Back
Top