Banter The No Dazzlering Big Cricket Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Scorelines are just a number

It’s the way you play that counts now
The thing is England have actually been impressive this series. 1-1 in India is no mean feat, but the way they keep wanting to make themselves bigger than they are is so embarrassing
 

Log in to remove this ad.

So Wade will be keeping for the T20’s while Inglis is picked as a specialist batsmen. This baffles me as Inglis is not only a better keeper but is also seen as the next in line Aussie keeper for all formats. Also it’s well known how trash Wade is as a keeper
 
BBL01 Final, was playing on Cricket Gold when I made the post.

(although was BBL01 technically still when it was a state comp ? So in that case it was BBL2)
Big Bash League is the franchises, was just the Big Bash when it was state based.
 
BBL01 Final, was playing on Cricket Gold when I made the post.

(although was BBL01 technically still when it was a state comp ? So in that case it was BBL2)
I find the naming convention confusing for BBL. BBL09 for instance could be referring to the year 2009 (yes yes, I know it didn't exist in '09, but I hope you get my point).

Needs Roman numerals. BBL IX, etc...
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I find the naming convention confusing for BBL. BBL09 for instance could be referring to the year 2009 (yes yes, I know it didn't exist in '09, but I hope you get my point).

Needs Roman numerals. BBL IX, etc...
Need to copy the AFLW and scrap the numbering and just go by years
 
although was BBL01 technically still when it was a state comp ? So in that case it was BBL2
The state comp was just called the T20 Big Bash. The BBL name and the stupid numbers came in with the new franchise based comp.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top