70 years is a short time to expect liberal democracy.Where are you going with this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
70 years is a short time to expect liberal democracy.Where are you going with this?
Why's that? If a society is disposed towards it, 70 years is plenty of time.70 years is a short time to expect liberal democracy.
Does a country need to be liberal in order to be considered functional?Why's that? If a society is disposed towards it, 70 years is plenty of time.
How long did it take the Asian exceptions, such as Japan and to a lesser extent South Korea? Or Taiwan? And Thailand has had more than 70 years.
Saying 70 years isn't long enough doesn't adequately explain the dysfunction in various Asian countries. Plenty of them have something like democracy. It just doesn't seem to do what it says on the tin.
This seems like a tangent.Does a country need to be liberal in order to be considered functional?
I wonder if India would be better off today if they had kicked the British out far earlier than they did and had evolved its own system of governing the individual states.
Do you consider China to be a dysfunctional Asian nation?This seems like a tangent.
Feel free to make your case but these unconnected rhetorical questions don't interest me.Do you consider China to be a dysfunctional Asian nation?
She never had any power to begin with. It was always the military in control.The f****ng dog is in detention again hey? Oh well, there go the cocktail parties and the international soirées!
Individual freedoms were less under Aung San Suu Kyi than the military and she has made sure that she cannot be held directly responsible for Myanmar’s intelligence apparatus, the thing that gave the Military control and still does what it always did.
Amnesty International stripped Aung San Suu Kyi of a human rights award. Myanmar remained as repressive as ever under her, jailing journalists and government critics who dare to speak out against genocide and ethnic cleansing.
In general, it's a fair thing to say. I wonder what institutions specifically led to India and Taiwan being a lot more democratically stable than their neighbours. The backlash in India was massive when Indira Gandhi tried her hand at dictatorship in the 70s.Is it Western chauvinism to say that Asian societies, with only a handful of exceptions, are simply not equipped for liberal democracy?
Go through the list - it's a catalogue of dysfunction.
I'm not saying it's because of any kind of racial essentialism. Rather, democracy relies on strong institutions - they must be developed and can't really be imposed.
India might be stable but it's not without its own dysfunction.In general, it's a fair thing to say. I wonder what institutions specifically led to India and Taiwan being a lot more democratically stable than their neighbours. The backlash in India was massive when Indira Gandhi tried her hand at dictatorship in the 70s.
I thought you were talking about having a functioning democracy, not whether everyone in society sung from the same hymn sheet.India might be stable but it's not without its own dysfunction.
I am. And yes, India has a "functioning democracy".I thought you were talking about having a functioning democracy, not whether everyone in society sung from the same hymn sheet.
Why are you using quotation marks? Are you implying India's democracy isn't actually functioning?I am. And yes, India has a "functioning democracy".
I'm implying there are some serious fault lines.Why are you using quotation marks? Are you implying India's democracy isn't actually functioning?
Anyone who lived through Marcos and still votes for his son deserves whatever negative consequences follow.This is pretty dark...
Daughter of Philippine leader Duterte to run for vice-president
Sara Duterte will stand alongside son of former dictator Ferdinand Marcos in 2022 elections in move that has alarmed rights activistswww.theguardian.com
What about everyone else?Anyone who lived through Marcos and still votes for his son deserves whatever negative consequences follow.
They're silly for not learning from history, but not quite as silly as those who lived through it, so they only deserve some of the negative consequences that follow.What about everyone else?
What are you saying?They're silly for not learning from history, but not quite as silly as those who lived through it, so they only deserve some of the negative consequences that follow.
Voting for Marcos Jr, who has publicly expressed that his dad did nothing wrong, is consenting to a return to Marcos-era values in government. Choosing someone as your running mate means accepting their baggage being lumped in with yours (see John McCain).What are you saying?
Voting for Duterte is not the same as wanting a return to the Marcos dictatorship.
Well that’s a read2022 South Korean presidential election - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
This is a wild ride.