Dusty Pup
Senior List
- Sep 29, 2020
- 266
- 130
- AFL Club
- Richmond
correct!Did Labrador end up signing Lachie Henderson?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
correct!Did Labrador end up signing Lachie Henderson?
Outside of Jones he is the biggest name to be recruited this year imo. He will be very good at this level of footycorrect!
No new player will be a 1 unless they are a returning junior and Lanthois is a Maroochydore junior correct?NTFL might only be 4 points, also depends where else those guys have played footy in last few years as some could be 5.
Payne and Eagles would be 5, doubt they get the 2 point penalty due to it being a different comp.
Even if Darwin blokes are 6 x 4, then Payne and Eagles 5 each make 10. 8 players 34 points, you have 16 points left for the last 14 players, Grange will likely be no problems achieving that. Lanthois would be 1 or 2 points.
Hows Lanthois 2? Will be 4 pts I reckon - 2 + 2 for playing against previous club.NTFL might only be 4 points, also depends where else those guys have played footy in last few years as some could be 5.
Payne and Eagles would be 5, doubt they get the 2 point penalty due to it being a different comp.
Even if Darwin blokes are 6 x 4, then Payne and Eagles 5 each make 10. 8 players 34 points, you have 16 points left for the last 14 players, Grange will likely be no problems achieving that. Lanthois would be 1 or 2 points.
Sorry just read your post Miller - okay. Will be surprised if that holds tbh. I would have thought the rule is for RS or U20 players moving up a division.Hows Lanthois 2? Will be 4 pts I reckon - 2 + 2 for playing against previous club.
Its a ridiculous rule/loophole, but definitely correct as i had it clarified last year.
If you are riding star eligible, you can change clubs within QAFL without the penalty
If you are a premium player (5 points or more) you also don't have penalty applied.
Makes no sense at all, as one would think these are the two most likely categories of player to be targeted for poaching that the rule is seeking to prevent, literally may as well just remove the rule altogether.
A guy who is 25 and played maybe 10 games of senior footy in 2 seasons can't move because he is a 6 pointer, even if he more for opportunity or to be at a club ckoser to home. But a gun 100 gamer from the VFL who is worth 5 can go to the highest bidder without penalty and end up with a lower point value than the "journeyman" who is essentially now stuck.