- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #3
MRP / Trib. 2024 - MRO Chook Lotto - Carlton Tribunal News & Reports
- Thread starter Aphrodite
- Start date
- Tagged users None
I don’t think Toby or Jesse deserved to be suspended.
Hewett got away with it
Exactly, all this talk about what choice did he have, he chose to leap into a player to make contact, that's his choice!!!!!
If Boyd had been traveling at greater velocity the impact would have been more severe.
Boyd was so far ahead of Greene to the ball that Greene had no chance to get there before Boyd.
Therefore Greene chose to initiate contact and should face the consequences!!
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #329
JustaBattler
Everyone Looks Better In Blue
- May 31, 2012
- 27,263
- 64,062
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Dude its 2024 not 1994
Wickzki
Definitely Sam MacLure.
- Oct 1, 2010
- 24,180
- 56,583
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Ophidians Old Boys, Blazers, MCFC
Does anyone remember the bump that Zac Williams got suspended for in the preseason a couple of years ago against Melb I think?
From memory he got 3 weeks even though the player got up and played out the game. I would love to get the vision and compare the Greene/Boyd incident.
Whilst we are on that, lets compare the boyd tackle that got him suspended for 3 weeks and the cameron tackle which because he was a good bloke didn't get any weeks.
What a shitshow we have here with Michael Christian/tribunal/AFL house!!!
Are they just a bunch of ******* goldfish and have no idea what happens from week to week????
From memory he got 3 weeks even though the player got up and played out the game. I would love to get the vision and compare the Greene/Boyd incident.
Whilst we are on that, lets compare the boyd tackle that got him suspended for 3 weeks and the cameron tackle which because he was a good bloke didn't get any weeks.
What a shitshow we have here with Michael Christian/tribunal/AFL house!!!
Are they just a bunch of ******* goldfish and have no idea what happens from week to week????
- Mar 26, 2015
- 11,985
- 22,073
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Melbourne Tigers, Bendigo Braves, OKC
Hewett's was at a stoppage (not off ball). He and Neale were niggling each other and jostling for position prior to the ball up.
Neale whacked Hewett in the guts and they both went for a chest whack at the same time.
The differences are marginal, but huge at the same time, if that makes sense.
- Apr 4, 2018
- 15,308
- 30,146
- AFL Club
- Carlton
The clown sitting in the middle of the panel in the midweek tackle program says Boyd should not have gone for that mark…it was kicked to Toby and how was he to know Boyd would kamaKaze himself towards him against flight of ball 
- Feb 19, 2018
- 1,379
- 1,925
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Sam landsberger what an absolute goose blokes got no idea that’s probably why he’s in the mediaThe clown sitting in the middle of the panel in the midweek tackle program says Boyd should not have gone for that mark…it was kicked to Toby and how was he to know Boyd would kamaKaze himself towards him against flight of ball
If you base it on outcome, lack of damage/concussion/injury, then possibly, but we need to start moving away from outcome based penalties
The Greene on Boyd incident occurring 10 times over, could result in 10 different outcomes, from the one we saw, to concussion, or facial breaks
If a player wants to claim they are contesting a mark, then best they start extending their arms or fists, otherwise the AFL should come down hard to prevent them reoccurring
- Apr 4, 2018
- 15,308
- 30,146
- AFL Club
- Carlton
AFL always about optics and or $$$. Punch to the face, as Slobbo (god help me for agreeing) at minimum should be a fine for marginal contact and increase to games missed based on severity. Let the kiddies sitting in the goal square during Jessie's attempted jabs see that and think how cool... I'll try that at my next under 12s.
Can't help but think if Jessie played for say Pies, Geelong, Richmond etc he would've got at least a fine. Need those bums on seats and for GWS to make top 4.
The AFL had a moment to validate their pre-season rule changes and come up way short here. Would love to see Laura Kane talk her way out of this one.
Can't help but think if Jessie played for say Pies, Geelong, Richmond etc he would've got at least a fine. Need those bums on seats and for GWS to make top 4.
The AFL had a moment to validate their pre-season rule changes and come up way short here. Would love to see Laura Kane talk her way out of this one.
The Old Dark Navy's
Moderator
- Moderator
- #341
Not classed as off the ball and he swung an arm to the side. Wasn't a striking action.
I’m not sure what Toby could have done. If someone is running back with the flight, you pretty much just have to let them have it and not contest.
Toby could have attempted to mark or spoil, possibly still would have been late, but at least that's playing the ball
- Apr 4, 2018
- 15,308
- 30,146
- AFL Club
- Carlton
He should have tried to mark the ball….just like what Boyd was trying to do.
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #345
Norf supporter
The tribunal is laughable.
It's like they let anyone who is a star off scott free. At this stage why wouldn't you challenge. Fair chance you'll get off no matter how obviously guilty you are.
It's like they let anyone who is a star off scott free. At this stage why wouldn't you challenge. Fair chance you'll get off no matter how obviously guilty you are.
This. Toby could have and should have marked it. The ball bounces off his shoulder before he and Boyd even collide.
Chose to turn the body rather than mark.
Well that depends on who the player is and the importance of the game or games said player may miss
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #349
Upheld 
David Zita - Twitter
David Zita - Twitter
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #350
‘For what, mate?’ New AFL rule ignored as Jesse Hogan cleared, Toby Greene banned for bump
‘For what, mate?’ New AFL rule ignored as one Giant cleared, Toby banned for bump
www.foxsports.com.au
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
