I thought I read somewhere that he needs to work on his defensive side?Watson, Watson, he's our man.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought I read somewhere that he needs to work on his defensive side?Watson, Watson, he's our man.
Both can absolutely crumb goals. Curtis struggles with pressure due to lack of tank but his tackle numbers improved across the season. No such issue with Sheezel. He was awesome in that Swans game when he went forward. Two goals (both snaps from memory), 5 tackles and 25 possessions. Those two in tandem could be devastating around goals.Both aren’t your traditional pressure forward that can crumb goals type
More your medium forwards who can take a mark and are classy
Come on Chubbs, stop with this nonsense.Just purely a hypothetical. I am not saying I'd do this as I'd definitely want to keep pick 2 (pick 3 I'd consider sliding to 6 and 11 on draft night if we want Curtin/Caddy/Sully) but if we were prepared to give up McKercher and Duursma we could trade down twice.
Trade 3 and 18 for Dees 6, 11 and F1.
Trade 2 and Dees F1 for Hawks 4 and F1 (not sure Hawks would do this)
Assume Hawks and Dees take McKercher and Duursma, order doesn't really matter.
4 - Watson/Curtin/Sanders (I'd probably go Watson because Dogs would take Sanders, leaving Curtin/Caddy/Sully)
6 - Curtin/Caddy/O'Sullivan
11 - Windsor/Wilson/Murphy (assuming O'Sullivan and Leake are gone, if not I'd consider them first)
15/17 - Roberts/Shoenmaker/Collard (not if Watto)/Hastie/Edwards/Goad/Green/Morris/A Reid etc. (depends on earlier picks)
Ahh that would Mark McGowns article in The Age " Some talent scouts expect him to be as successful as the likes of Eddie Betts and Stephen Milne – small forwards who kicked more than 570 goals each – but they would like to see some defensive improvement. Watson laid only three tackles across his last five Talent League games. Recruiters’ other query on him was his lack of impact against senior opposition for the AFL Academy."I thought I read somewhere that he needs to work on his defensive side?
I’m not saying they can’t but it’s not their main avenue to goalBoth can absolutely crumb goals. Curtis struggles with pressure due to lack of tank but his tackle numbers improved across the season. No such issue with Sheezel. He was awesome in that Swans game when he went forward. Two goals (both snaps from memory), 5 tackles and 25 possessions. Those two in tandem could be devastating around goals.
That's a no from meJust purely a hypothetical. I am not saying I'd do this as I'd definitely want to keep pick 2 (pick 3 I'd consider sliding to 6 and 11 on draft night if we want Curtin/Caddy/Sully) but if we were prepared to give up McKercher and Duursma we could trade down twice.
Trade 3 and 18 for Dees 6, 11 and F1.
Trade 2 and Dees F1 for Hawks 4 and F1 (not sure Hawks would do this)
Assume Hawks and Dees take McKercher and Duursma, order doesn't really matter.
4 - Watson/Curtin/Sanders (I'd probably go Watson because Dogs would take Sanders, leaving Curtin/Caddy/Sully)
6 - Curtin/Caddy/O'Sullivan
11 - Windsor/Wilson/Murphy (assuming O'Sullivan and Leake are gone, if not I'd consider them first)
15/17 - Roberts/Shoenmaker/Collard (not if Watto)/Hastie/Edwards/Goad/Green/Morris/A Reid etc. (depends on earlier picks)
Curtis had an eight tackle game in round 22 this year and a big uptick in tackle numbers towards the end of the year. Thus, I am bullish about his ability to apply pressure in the long term. He's certainly powerful enough. Just needs the tank to motor from contest to contest. He could be anything IMO. Goalkicking accuracy and defensive intent are the big areas for him to work on but for both of those a lot of it is in the head so easy gains can be made. Sheezel impressed me with his defensive ability in his first year. Thought it might be a bit of a weakness but he is decent IMO. Curtis very good overhead as you point out which makes him a very difficult matchup.I’m not saying they can’t but it’s not their main avenue to goal
And the tackle pressure like you pointed out with curtis
Looks like he got a rocket at round 13.Curtis had an eight tackle game in round 22 this year and a big uptick in tackle numbers towards the end of the year. Thus, I am bullish about his ability to apply pressure in the long term. He's certainly powerful enough. Just needs the tank to motor from contest to contest. He could be anything IMO. Goalkicking accuracy and defensive intent are the big areas for him to work on but for both of those a lot of it is in the head so easy gains can be made. Sheezel impressed me with his defensive ability in his first year. Thought it might be a bit of a weakness but he is decent IMO. Curtis very good overhead as you point out which makes him a very difficult matchup.
Looks like Nostrils has done himself a mischief
What job did you end up changing to Uber Roo ?Joined the construction industry during Covid, after 30 years of different types of jobs
( owned the deli at Chadstone for 12 years and could see those God forsaken meetings at the adjacent food court from a distance, but was never invited , but that’s a different story for a different time )
Anyway back to my point
I’ve met more North boys at CFMEU tier 1 sites in the last 3 years, than what I did in 30 years of regular employment
Since the early 90s I’ve been going to the footy on my own ( the family bailed on me) but these days I go with tradies I met on the job… every home game without fail
Will be great to start winning and celebrating with my new north mates
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
This is why we don’t need Watson. Harry gunna be absolutely elite when he goes forward. We ain’t seen nothin yet.Both can absolutely crumb goals. Curtis struggles with pressure due to lack of tank but his tackle numbers improved across the season. No such issue with Sheezel. He was awesome in that Swans game when he went forward. Two goals (both snaps from memory), 5 tackles and 25 possessions. Those two in tandem could be devastating around goals.
Is there anyway we can time the suspension to finish just after we take Duursma with pick 3?Will be back just in time for the draft at least.
From memory Stewy turned down some Assistant roles because Mrs Dew didn't want to leave Sydney, looks like she may have had some influence in this decision.Swans
From memory Stewy turned down some Assistant roles because Mrs Dew didn't want to leave Sydney, looks like she may have had some influence in this decision.
Who?Has anybody suggested Watson as a possible draft selection option?
Asking for a friend.
Beethoven had his critics too blackshadow. See if you can name three.Looks like Nostrils has done himself a mischief
She's a TV presenter so going back to Sydney would be good for her career, too.From memory Stewy turned down some Assistant roles because Mrs Dew didn't want to leave Sydney, looks like she may have had some influence in this decision.
Just googled her. I'd like to say he's punching well above his weight but for some reason that doesn't seem appropriate in his case.She's a TV presenter so going back to Sydney would be good for her career, too.
She's a TV presenter so going back to Sydney would be good for her career, too.
Please don't add logic and common sense to my narrative.He's a completely logical replacement for Don Pyke as well.
It all makes sense now, I'd follow her all over the country too were it not for the restraining order.She's a TV presenter so going back to Sydney would be good for her career, too.