Which team out of Adelaide, North and Hawthorn has the better youth?

Which team has the better youth?

  • Adelaide

    Votes: 315 28.3%
  • Hawthorn

    Votes: 335 30.1%
  • North

    Votes: 462 41.5%

  • Total voters
    1,112

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Murray has been excellent all season & has improved his offensive side compared to last year, particularly improving his disposal. For me he is proven quality going forward.

I would liken Blanck more to Butts, who has a mixed season struggling with injuries. It's early days though.
I think they’re really similar because blanck is also good offensively and I’d trust him. Think he’ll be quality. But it’s a less of a sample size and you’ve watched more of Murray.
 
I think they’re really similar because blanck is also good offensively and I’d trust him. Think he’ll be quality. But it’s a less of a sample size and you’ve watched more of Murray.
One is in the U/22 AA squad, the other wouldn't have even have been considered.

Murray is now a proven quality, whereas Blanck isn't... yet.

They really are not at similar levels!
 
One is in the U/22 AA squad, the other wouldn't have even have been considered.

Murray is now a proven quality, whereas Blanck isn't... yet.

They really are not at similar levels!
I think the way I look at it is more their ability and not in a simplistic way. It’s really hard with blanck and the amount of consistency in his games. But like he dominated naughton on the weekend, in a smashing against Gold Coast he belted Ben king and was one of our best. I rate him highly and I rate Murray. It’s more so the amount of consistency
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I think the way I look at it is more their ability and not in a simplistic way. It’s really hard with blanck and the amount of consistency in his games. But like he dominated naughton on the weekend, in a smashing against Gold Coast he belted Ben king and was one of our best. I rate him highly and I rate Murray. It’s more so the amount of consistency
Indeed... Murray has been consistent all season... which why he is proven at this level & in the U/22 AA squad... & inconsistency is why Blanck is a still unproven.

It takes more than a few good games to be proven at AFL level.
 
Indeed... Murray has been consistent all season... which why he is proven at this level & in the U/22 AA squad... & inconsistency is why Blanck is a still unproven.

It takes more than a few good games to be proven at AFL level.
It does but I’m confident he will be. I am a big Murray fan tho, albeit I’m unsure why Butts got worse. He was superb his first season.
 
It does but I’m confident he will be. I am a big Murray fan tho, albeit I’m unsure why Butts got worse. He was superb his first season.
Butts has been carrying different injuries most of this season. He would be our most subbed off player as they have tried to manage him through the season.

Still think he is a dependable no flair player, but imo Keane offers more going forward offensively. The 2 have most of next season to battle it out as Murray recovers from his ACL.
 
Butts has been carrying different injuries most of this season. He would be our most subbed off player as they have tried to manage him through the season.

Still think he is a dependable no flair player, but imo Keane offers more going forward offensively. The 2 have most of next season to battle it out as Murray recovers from his ACL.
Still remember the Butts and Hawkins battle. Fell in love with him then, not many did what he did that day.
 
It does but I’m confident he will be. I am a big Murray fan tho, albeit I’m unsure why Butts got worse. He was superb his first season.
Yeah not sure what’s happened to Butts but he’s still young.
Only 3 games but like what I’ve seen from Keane, will be really interesting how he looks after a proper pre-season.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I dont thus the questions, in response to a big claim.

Is there evidence of his standing, or the vibe ?
There is a big body of evidence!

Ask anyone who has watched our games... or visit the Murray thread on our board.

Easily our most improved player this year.
 
North still leading the count? Guess a lot of people went the early crow on that one.
Our youth is ****ing concerning tbh. Other than sheeze and wardlaw who have only been here for a minute, who else have we got? We’ve had some nice cameos from some of the young guys here and there but there’s no consistency from them.
**** I hate this sport some times
 
North still leading the count? Guess a lot of people went the early crow on that one.
Our youth is ******* concerning tbh. Other than sheeze and wardlaw who have only been here for a minute, who else have we got? We’ve had some nice cameos from some of the young guys here and there but there’s no consistency from them.
* I hate this sport some times

I like Eddie Ford.
Will Phillips will be fine IMO.

Tom Powell is the biggest concern though. Most thought he was a draft steal and would become a reliable accumulator like a Jackson Macrae. I believe he's currently struggling to get a senior gig however?
 
Hawks have the best youth by far. Plus they are coached by a guy who is uncompromising and obviously pretty inspiring given the results over the last month or two. Long term success with this young group.

North are looking ok. Some absolute quality in their list, just hoping Clarko can get the best out of them.

Crows are…. meh… They have had so many false dawns. Bit like Freo and Port – you expect teams from proud football states to be really competitive but these 3 teams – freo, port and crows – have been so ordinary for so long (in terms of finals and ultimately GF success) you cant rely on them to get the job done. Until we see a premiership from any one of these teams they remain under achievers for teams from dominant AFL states
 
then you haven't watched Murray play much if you think he's not close to them. Has been one of the best lock down defenders this year.

only 4 other small forwards have more goals than Rankine, and Izak has more impact around the ground than 3 of them.

I'm pretty confident Murray is not close to AA selection. I'm not saying he is not a great lockdown defender - he may well be..but to be selected All Australian that is no longer enough. You now need to be able to shut down your opponent AND offer plenty the other way. They haven't picked a pure stopper in year and years (because the standards is so high with players able to both shut down their opponent and intercept and rebound the other way).

According to the 'benchmarking' on the AFL site (i.e. compared to other key defenders) Murray is not elite in any category (and is in fact 'below average' in most).

He IS a good stopper - he only loses 17.5% of his 1 on 1's (and has a decent amount of spoils). However, I looked up 3 of the names on my list for comparison (as doing everyone takes too long) - Jacob Weitering loses only 10%, Sam Taylor 12% and James Sicily 14%. IN other words, according to the available data, these guys are better pure stoppers than Nick Murray. But even if this point was arguable and let's say they are even as stoppers, look at the other data available

Sicily, for example, averages 10 intercepts a game (elite), Murray 4 (below average)
Sicily averages 9 pressure acts (elite), Murray 5 (below average)
Sicily averages more than double the tackles....

and then the offensive stats.....

Murray v Sicily.PNG

This is just 1 catgory from 1 player comparison but it begins to tell the story. Sicily is double and triple nearly all of these metrics. The other categories tell the same story - metres gained, rebound 50's, score involvements, you name it - it's all double or triple (was going to post but the images will make my post way too long).

I thought it would be fair to choose someone less 'offensive' than Sicily and chose Wilkie as he is more gaining a reputation as an elite stopper but it's the same story. He averages 21 disposals going the other way (more than double Murray). It's the same for intercepts, tackles, rebounds, etc, etc.

The expectations for elite key defenders have changed and the standard is so high at the moment. Murray is doing a good job but really isn't close to AA for the reasons I have mentioned.
 
I'm pretty confident Murray is not close to AA selection. I'm not saying he is not a great lockdown defender - he may well be..but to be selected All Australian that is no longer enough. You now need to be able to shut down your opponent AND offer plenty the other way. They haven't picked a pure stopper in year and years (because the standards is so high with players able to both shut down their opponent and intercept and rebound the other way).

According to the 'benchmarking' on the AFL site (i.e. compared to other key defenders) Murray is not elite in any category (and is in fact 'below average' in most).

He IS a good stopper - he only loses 17.5% of his 1 on 1's (and has a decent amount of spoils). However, I looked up 3 of the names on my list for comparison (as doing everyone takes too long) - Jacob Weitering loses only 10%, Sam Taylor 12% and James Sicily 14%. IN other words, according to the available data, these guys are better pure stoppers than Nick Murray. But even if this point was arguable and let's say they are even as stoppers, look at the other data available

Sicily, for example, averages 10 intercepts a game (elite), Murray 4 (below average)
Sicily averages 9 pressure acts (elite), Murray 5 (below average)
Sicily averages more than double the tackles....

and then the offensive stats.....

View attachment 1774737

This is just 1 catgory from 1 player comparison but it begins to tell the story. Sicily is double and triple nearly all of these metrics. The other categories tell the same story - metres gained, rebound 50's, score involvements, you name it - it's all double or triple (was going to post but the images will make my post way too long).

I thought it would be fair to choose someone less 'offensive' than Sicily and chose Wilkie as he is more gaining a reputation as an elite stopper but it's the same story. He averages 21 disposals going the other way (more than double Murray). It's the same for intercepts, tackles, rebounds, etc, etc.

The expectations for elite key defenders have changed and the standard is so high at the moment. Murray is doing a good job but really isn't close to AA for the reasons I have mentioned.

If Sicily is 2 or 3 times better than Murray and he cant get AA, this Murray fellow must be genuinely average.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top