Current WAR CRIMES Israel - * ICC issues warrants for Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu & Yoav Gallant & for Hamas's Mohammed Deif

Remove this Banner Ad

The ICC has also issued a warrant for Hamas leader Mohammed Deif, who Israel says they have killed.

According to the ICC, the chamber “found reasonable grounds to believe” that Deif was “responsible for the crimes against humanity of murder; extermination; torture; and rape and other form of sexual violence; as well as the war crimes of murder, cruel treatment, torture; taking hostages; outrages upon personal dignity; and rape and other form of sexual violence”.

It also said there were reasonable grounds to believe the crimes against humanity were “part of a widespread and systematic attack directed by Hamas and other armed groups against the civilian population of Israel”.

For Netanyahu and Gallant, who was replaced as defence minister earlier this month, the chamber “found reasonable grounds to believe” that they “each bear criminal responsibility for the following crimes as co-perpetrators for committing the acts jointly with others: the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts”.

It also found reasonable grounds to believe that “each bear criminal responsibility as civilian superiors for the war crime of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population”.




INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT - Elements of Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes
 
Last edited:
Not just an antisemitic sign, but neo Nazis in a verbal onslaught against Jews. They're emboldened.


The police would 100% know who all these people are, charge them under hate crime laws.
 


Yet more examples of Palestinians being attacked by Hamas for taking aid in Gaza.

Seems Hamas is holding aid hostage, attacking anyone who dare help themselves to aid for themselves and their families.

One of Gaza's hospitals?

Old mate Hamza hasn't been keeping up with local events by the look of things.
 

Log in to remove this ad.



Yet more examples of Palestinians being attacked by Hamas for taking aid in Gaza.

Seems Hamas is holding aid hostage, attacking anyone who dare help themselves to aid for themselves and their families.

I'm genuinely surprised people in Gaza aren't attacking each other constantly for food/Water. In this country we were punching on when toilet paper was hard to find for a few days.
 
No. It's weird they condemn a sign but stay silent on an arson attack. Perhaps there's pressure on them. There would be racist police like any other group of people but this is an official position, or lack thereof.
Yes, I thought the standard now for a car fire, was for the PM to meet with international ambassadors and the state premier to do a presso promising a full police response.
 
Why does it have to go anywhere, just pointing out the difference.

It's not just a police thing, it's media, politics and public in general.

You found it funny when I mentioned it last time and here we are again. If you find nothing wrong, that's ok you're not alone sadly.
Yeah it's funny how conspiracy brained you are. The truck fire is being investigated s potentially Islamophobic. It sounds likely it was due to the witness testimony but it's possibly unrelated. According to police "this investigation remains in its early stages, so we are not ruling anything in or out". Police also indicated they were investigating whether a second incident, where the tray of a ute was set alight in a neighboring street, might be linked.

So they just aren't prejudging the motive.

Whereas with the antisemitic incident, there were a bunch of rednecks shouting insane Jew hatred in public, clearly and unequivocally an antisemitic incident. If they were shouting insane Islamophobic nonsense you think police wouldn't condemn it? If not, why not? Be an adult and tell us what you think explains the difference. Don't duck and hide.
 
Yeah it's funny how conspiracy brained you are. The truck fire is being investigated s potentially Islamophobic. It sounds likely it was due to the witness testimony but it's possibly unrelated. According to police "this investigation remains in its early stages, so we are not ruling anything in or out". Police also indicated they were investigating whether a second incident, where the tray of a ute was set alight in a neighboring street, might be linked.

So they just aren't prejudging the motive.

Whereas with the antisemitic incident, there were a bunch of rednecks shouting insane Jew hatred in public, clearly and unequivocally an antisemitic incident. If they were shouting insane Islamophobic nonsense you think police wouldn't condemn it? If not, why not? Be an adult and tell us what you think explains the difference. Don't duck and hide.
I guess you skipped the part where a witness says he heard "**** the muslims, burn them all"

But hey, at least you think it maybe possibly Islamaphobic.
 
I guess you skipped the part where a witness says he heard "**** the muslims, burn them all"

But hey, at least you think it maybe possibly Islamaphobic.

Eye and ear witnesses need to be screened for reliability, hopefully there's also CCTV somewhere.

The Nazis are on video with clear audio.
 
I guess you skipped the part where a witness says he heard "**** the muslims, burn them all"

But hey, at least you think it maybe possibly Islamaphobic.
I guess you skipped the part where I said "It sounds likely it was [Islamophobic] due to the witness testimony but it's possibly unrelated" :drunk:

Remember, my take on the syanagogue burning was exactly the same. I said it would be irresponsible for police to prejudge motive before they have all the information.

What a desperate and pathetically wrong way to avoid the question. So I will ask it again:

If the rednecks outside Victorian parliament were shouting insane Islamophobic nonsense instead of antisemitic you think police wouldn't condemn it? If not, why not? Be an adult and tell us what you think explains the difference. Don't duck and hide.
 
Last edited:
Remember, my take on the syanagogue burning was exactly the same. I said it would be irresponsible for police to prejudge motive before they have all the information.

What a desperate and pathetically wrong way to avoid the question. So I will ask it again:

If the rednecks outside Victorian parliament were shouting insane Islamophobic nonsense instead of antisemitic you think police wouldn't condemn it? If not, why not? Be an adult and tell us what you think explains the difference. Don't duck and hide.
It's not just the police though. The media and politicians went in to over drive with anti semetic rhetoric before anyone knew anything about the synagogue fire. This gets a few hundred words on the abc.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

It's not just the police though. The media and politicians went in to over drive with anti semetic rhetoric before anyone knew anything about the synagogue fire. This gets a few hundred words on the abc.
Can you explain why? You're trying to imply that there can only be some nefarious reason for this, come out and tell me what the differences between these two incidents are. It's really easy to explain, but I would absolutely love your explanation for it. Don't duck the question. Have the courage to tell us why you think there is a difference in media and political attention.

Remember in 2016 when a car outside a mosque got torched and Islamophobic hate was graffitied nearby as people were praying inside and the PM condemned it and it made international news?

 
Not just an antisemitic sign, but neo Nazis in a verbal onslaught against Jews. They're emboldened.



That link has been removed, possibly because there's an ongoing investigation and it's evidence. These antisocial, hateful narcs might also be getting a look at for the Synagogue fire.
 
I guess you skipped the part where I said "It sounds likely it was [Islamophobic] due to the witness testimony but it's possibly unrelated" :drunk:

Remember, my take on the syanagogue burning was exactly the same. I said it would be irresponsible for police to prejudge motive before they have all the information.

What a desperate and pathetically wrong way to avoid the question. So I will ask it again:

If the rednecks outside Victorian parliament were shouting insane Islamophobic nonsense instead of antisemitic you think police wouldn't condemn it? If not, why not? Be an adult and tell us what you think explains the difference. Don't duck and hide.
Why is Dave Sharma denying anti-islamic violence?

Why aren't these stories splashed on the nightly news like anti-semitic attacks?

Instead of trying to paint me as the problem, ask yourself why does there need to be a difference in how the incidents are portrayed by some?

I'm not comlaining that anti-semitism is being called out, i'm asking why people need to play down islamaphobic hate.

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article...lamophobic-graffiti-in-sydneys-west/mqi410o62

Separately on Sunday, NSW Liberal senator Dave Sharma stood by comments he made this week
about Islamophobia
.

On Monday, responding to the arson attack on the Melbourne synagogue, Sharma said: "Any time any senior minister mentioned antisemitism in the last 12 months, they also mentioned a fictitious Islamophobia which was not going on," he said.
 
Can you explain why? You're trying to imply that there can only be some nefarious reason for this, come out and tell me what the differences between these two incidents are. It's really easy to explain, but I would absolutely love your explanation for it. Don't duck the question. Have the courage to tell us why you think there is a difference in media and political attention.

Remember in 2016 when a car outside a mosque got torched and Islamophobic hate was graffitied nearby as people were praying inside and the PM condemned it and it made international news?

Simples.

Political zionism and its interference with our media and politicians. The Israel lobby is strong in this country and this has been clearly enunciated by people in both politics and the media who have had lived experience of it.

Crazy that you had to go back to 2016 to try and find an equivalence in a year when this has happened, with almost zero media coverage or condemnation from politicians.

1734733769188.png

Meanwhile Jacinta tried to placate Zionists with 100k of taxpayers dollars before a police investigation even began.
 
Struck a playground. Truly a wonderful achievement by the racist terrorists :embarrassedv1:

Is it a competition? Would you be more impressed if they hit a hospital?

Crazy that they have the tech to hit anything. Only a handful of nations are capa le of this. They've just come out of a long civil war. Anyone who thinks Iran don't have this capability has to be kidding themselves.
 
Simples.

Political zionism and its interference with our media and politicians. The Israel lobby is strong in this country and this has been clearly enunciated by people in both politics and the media who have had lived experience of it.
There we have it. At least you're not a coward, just a conspiracy theorist. A place of worship was burned out with people inside it in an alleged terrorist attack gets widespread coverage, but a truck with nobody in it that is flying Palestinian flags had its tray burned doesn't get the same coverage? Well must be the Jewish woops I mean Israel lobby.:drunk: I imagine if they left something obvious derogatory of Islam at the scene, it would have got similar coverage to the antisemitic graffiti near cars that were vandalized in Sydney.
Crazy that you had to go back to 2016 to try and find an equivalence in a year when this has happened, with almost zero media coverage or condemnation from politicians.
Yes because places of worship being burned or cars set on fire while people are inside is totally a common thing that happens every year in Australia :embarrassedv1: Doing a google search for a widespread coverage of an antisemitic attack in Australia prior to October 2023 found not much that rose to the kind of national coverage that would be denounced at the level of a Prime Minister. The nearest I found was in 2013 a NSW premier denounced an alleged antisemitic attack against a Jew in Bondi. Couldn't find much else beside that from a quick search.

That this is your explanation for the fact that a similar incident got similar coverage in Australia is just more evidence of your conspiracy brain. The simple explanation is these kinds of attacks against places of worship are shocking and uncommon, that's why I had to go back so far. Just like I have to go back even further to find something remotely close for an antisemitic incident of a remotely similar scale of media and political coverage in Australia.
 
Last edited:
Is it a competition? Would you be more impressed if they hit a hospital?

Crazy that they have the tech to hit anything. Only a handful of nations are capa le of this. They've just come out of a long civil war. Anyone who thinks Iran don't have this capability has to be kidding themselves.
Crazy that they steal from the poor people of Yemen to fund their own racist terror campaign against Israel and all that bought them was a destroyed slippery slide in Israel. :embarrassedv1: What an embarrassing group of redneck lunatics.
 
it would have got similar coverage to the antisemitic graffiti near cars that were vandalized in Sydney.
Except it didn't, not even close.

Not surprising you playing it down though, seeing as you need to rebuild your home everytime the tide comes in.
 
Crazy that they steal from the poor people of Yemen to fund their own racist terror campaign against Israel and all that bought them was a destroyed slippery slide in Israel. :embarrassedv1: What an embarrassing group of redneck lunatics.

Words have meanings Jazny. It's the rednecks that are supplying weapons to Israel for their war against children.
 
There we have it. At least you're not a coward, just a conspiracy theorist. A place of worship was burned out with people inside it in an alleged terrorist attack gets widespread coverage, but a truck with nobody in it that is flying Palestinian flags had its tray burned doesn't get the same coverage? Well must be the Jewish woops I mean Israel lobby.:drunk: I imagine if they left something obvious derogatory of Islam at the scene, it would have got similar coverage to the antisemitic graffiti near cars that were vandalized in Sydney.

Yes because places of worship being burned or cars set on fire while people are inside is totally a common thing that happens every year in Australia :embarrassedv1: Doing a google search for a widespread coverage of an antisemitic attack in Australia prior to October 2023 found not much that rose to the kind of national coverage that would be denounced at the level of a Prime Minister. The nearest I found was in 2013 a NSW premier denounced an alleged antisemitic attack against a Jew in Bondi. Couldn't find much else beside that from a quick search.

That this is your explanation for the fact that a similar incident got similar coverage in Australia is just more evidence of your conspiracy brain. The simple explanation is these kinds of attacks against places of worship are shocking and uncommon, that's why I had to go back so far. Just like I have to go back even further to find something remotely close for an antisemitic incident of a remotely similar scale of media and political coverage in Australia.
A lot more attacks on Moslems aren't racially motivated compared to attacks on Jews, apparently.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.abc.net.au/article/103018278
 
Crazy that they steal from the poor people of Yemen to fund their own racist terror campaign against Israel and all that bought them was a destroyed slippery slide in Israel. :embarrassedv1: What an embarrassing group of redneck lunatics.

Never has someone been so triggered by attacks on Israel, yet so blase about Israeli terror. You are straight up lying if you're pretending you aren't Israeli, or have Israeli family.

You are so coded it's cartoonish.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current WAR CRIMES Israel - * ICC issues warrants for Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu & Yoav Gallant & for Hamas's Mohammed Deif

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top