NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 4

Remove this Banner Ad

Here is PART 3

Donald Trump was sworn in as president of the United States on Monday 20th January, 2025 in Washington DC.

Take Note

Anti-trans commentary will be deleted and warnings issued, that includes mockery and trying to pass it off as a joke.

Play nice, please.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Blame yourself mate. You're a classic obdurate. You always have to have the last word. Most people give up and let you have it. I decided a while ago not to. Nothing gets under an obdurate's skin more than someone who won't let him lave the last word.
obdurate

adjective
  1. stubbornly refusing to change one's opinion or course of action.
I may be refusing to change my opinion, but I'm not stubbornly or unreasonably doing so. Like.. sorry mate, but you're going to have to do a bit better than "trust me bro, it's fake/AI".

I have specifically stated several times in this thread that I will change my opinion based on actual information presented, most recently in a reply to you only a few hours ago :drunk:
Incredible last line there too - you're actually suggesting here that were Wolff himself were to come out and admit he made the whole thing up and AI'd the tape that I wouldn't accept or acknowledge that. Reality being that of course I would, I'm a functioning rational adult.

Another example here a few days ago in a reply to Lebbo73 (any danger by the way Lebbo??)
Post up the proof that the single air traffic controller doing the job of 2 thing is false and I'll acknowledge I got it wrong

You're talking utter shit, mate. You know you are. That you guys are so routinely unable to back up anything you claim is your issue, not mine.

Another lame attempt. Although they hate Trump and have some bias I can't recall ever saying they've reported something false. I've even posted articles from them.
You'd be on your own among right wingers in this thread then, but like I said good to know :thumbsu:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

rofl

Skipper & co. are gonna love this one!


Just another piece of fawning performative dipshittery to bow and scrape before dear leader, in absence of any actual governance which might possibly help the working class.

 
Last edited:
obdurate

adjective
  1. stubbornly refusing to change one's opinion or course of action.
I may be refusing to change my opinion, but I'm not stubbornly or unreasonably doing so. Like.. sorry mate, but you're going to have to do a bit better than "trust me bro, it's fake/AI".

:rolleyesv1: Round and round we go.

In response to the bolded, I already have. Last time I said the following you deflected with photos and flight logs. :rolleyesv1:

Maybe you can actually answer the question this time instead of being such a pencil necked coward.

The idea that Epstein was Trump's closest friend is fake. It's pushed by a guy who is a self-admitted fabulist with a well documented penchant for embellishment and relies on you believing he has 100 hours of tapes of Epstein talking specifically about Trump. Having got past that little hurdle it relies on you believing anything Epstein would say. Why would you believe that piece of shit? ¯\(ツ)

In summary we're never going to agree on whether the tape excerpt is real so just answer the bolded question regarding the reliability or truthfulness of Epstein.
 
:rolleyesv1: Round and round we go.

In response to the bolded, I already have. Last time I said the following you deflected with photos and flight logs. :rolleyesv1:

Maybe you can actually answer the question this time instead of being such a pencil necked coward.

The idea that Epstein was Trump's closest friend is fake. It's pushed by a guy who is a self-admitted fabulist with a well documented penchant for embellishment and relies on you believing he has 100 hours of tapes of Epstein talking specifically about Trump. Having got past that little hurdle it relies on you believing anything Epstein would say. Why would you believe that piece of shit? ¯\(ツ)

What Epstein said to Wolff actually aligns with what Trump has said in interviews.


1742207172582.png
 
What Epstein said to Wolff actually aligns with what Trump has said in interviews.


View attachment 2253081

No. What the person who Wolff asserts is Epstein (on his only released tape excerpt) says is that he was Trump's best friend for 10 years. That doesn't align with Trump saying 23 years ago (before Epstein was charged or investigated) that he knew him.

Keep in mind also that Wolff was a former business partner of Epstein and Harvey Weinstein. He also wrote a piece in New York magazine in an attempt to rehabilitate Epstein's image. It's more likely Epstein was Wolff's closest friend than Trump's.
 
No. What the person who Wolff asserts is Epstein (on his only released tape excerpt) says is that he was Trump's best friend for 10 years. That doesn't align with Trump saying 23 years ago (before Epstein was charged or investigated) that he knew him.

Keep in mind also that Wolff was a former business partner of Epstein and Harvey Weinstein. He also wrote a piece in New York magazine in an attempt to rehabilitate Epstein's image. It's more likely Epstein was Wolff's closest friend than Trump's.

Maybe Wolff was the one with the camera, taking all those photos of Trump and Epstein hanging out together?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)



The above post is a bit simplistic but I can take you through all the actual studies themselves if you like and then you'll understand what was actually done. For example they injected 6-10 week old female mice with Testosterone for up to 16 weeks and recorded how many of them ceased their oestrus cycle.


It's literally impossible for a mouse to be transgender.

How can a mouse even express its gender identity even assuming it had a gender idenity in the first place for ****s sake?

All of your links (including the one above) are from social media sites, with a not insignificant number of them being Bot accounts linked to Russia and peddling deliberate misinformation.
 
It's literally impossible for a mouse to be transgender.

I agree it's currently almost impossible. That's why I said the tweet was a bit simplistic but I was prepared to link to the actual studies which prove the gender affirming care experimentation aspect.

All of your links (including the one above) are from social media sites...

So you are saying every link I've posted in this thread is from social media sites or just every link on this specific subject?
 
It’s funny how you can trust MSNBC when things suit your agenda but won’t when it goes against you.

Other than literally one occasion (on the subject of Trump playing golf) I can't recall taking issue with anything put out by MSNBC. Plenty of times I've criticised CNN but other than one specific instance (on the subject of Trump playing golf) I can't recall taking issue with anything put out by MSNBC.

I would note that I do quite often post stuff from sources I think aren't great but I know you guys hold up on a pedestal. Snopes for instance, who have been responsible for some of the worst fact checks I've ever come across but I'm sure you believe have literal rays of sunlight streaming out of their collective cloacas.
 
Other than literally one occasion (on the subject of Trump playing golf) I can't recall taking issue with anything put out by MSNBC. Plenty of times I've criticised CNN but other than one specific instance (on the subject of Trump playing golf) I can't recall taking issue with anything put out by MSNBC.

I would note that I do quite often post stuff from sources I think aren't great but I know you guys hold up on a pedestal. Snopes for instance, who have been responsible for some of the worst fact checks I've ever come across but I'm sure you believe have literal rays of sunlight streaming out of their collective cloacas.
I was referring to you specifically. Usually the case is that people on the right say can’t trust mainstream media but use it when it suits them.

I think all media should be scrutinised fairly and everything fact checked.
 
Agreed. This is why I subscribe to a couple of podcasts that deconstruct media narratives.
Yeah but a lot of stuff you share are far right sources. Lots of twitter posts that are hardly reliable. They are far more likely to be sharing misinformation and disinformation.

It’s rarely nuanced.

My point is it always seems to be fair and balanced when it suits someone’s beliefs already. There’s plenty of times where Trump has said something and later claimed the opposite. You can’t argue that because there is video and audio proof yet somehow it seems to be argued.

This isn’t to say the left don’t do it either but their sources are more credible due to many receiving higher education than red states.
 
This isn’t to say the left don’t do it either but their sources are more credible due to many receiving higher education than red states.
Read: having received critical theory brainwashing from captured education institutions such as Columbia. If you don’t graduate with a Bachelor of Activism from these cesspits you’ll be an exception.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 4


Write your reply...

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top