Transfer Discussion Thread

[RossFC]

 

[chef]

 

[chef]

 

[SM]

Oh goodie. Would much rather sell Paqueta to them, but if they offered over 100M.....

I thought Saudi clubs usually offer reasonable fees, just offer massive wages.

 

[Misher]

 

[DBAH0]

I thought Saudi clubs usually offer reasonable fees, just offer massive wages.

I can't see Kudus going there when he's not even in the prime of his career, but think we'd need minimum 70M to even consider a deal really.

 

[DBAH0]

Apparently Lopetegui rates him hugely, funny how Ten Hag wants all the ex Ajax players though.

I would consider it if we got more than 50M for him though.

 

[Thistle]

Don't like us selling Maatsen. I get he may not have got on with Poch but he could thrive under a new manager and be as good as a new signing. Just weird that we're willing to give him to a rival that's proven to be better at identifying talent than we are...

 

[RPCB]

Did Fab accidentally confirm charge #116?

 

[moomba]

We haven't signed Savio from Girona.

 

[RPCB]

We haven't signed Savio from Girona.

Hasn’t it been on the cards for months?

 

[moomba]

Hasn’t it been on the cards for months?

He's owned by Troyes (one of the other CFG clubs).

Not 100% sure any deal has been finalised either although my son thinks it has.

 

[moomba]

As long as he's sold at fair market value I don't see the problem with United buying him fwiw. Rules seem a bit arbitrary.

 

[DBAH0]

 

[Jatz]

As long as he's sold at fair market value I don't see the problem with United buying him fwiw. Rules seem a bit arbitrary.

Think you'd need to determine how to value 'fair market' prices before you could do that.

 

[Lebbo73]

Who aren’t you buying in the transfer window should be the real discussion.

 

[chef]

Who aren’t you buying in the transfer window should be the real discussion.

I guess we'll buy and sell a few players like normal.

 

[Zidane98]

I guess we'll buy and sell a few players like normal.

If all of your deadwood is flogged off you will piss PSR in this season.

 

[Art Vandelay_]

Think you'd need to determine how to value 'fair market' prices before you could do that.

Would be very hard to do.

In a free market fair value is the price that two independent people or company's are willing to agree on.

Which when two linked entities are trading circumvents that process.

 

[Jatz]

Would be very hard to do.

In a free market fair value is the price that two independent people or company's are willing to agree on.

Which when two linked entities are trading circumvents that process.

That's what I mean though.

First you'd have to evaluate a fair market value that clubs independent of the selling club would pay. Only then could two linked entities be able to complete the transaction between each other.

 

[chef]

If all of your deadwood is flogged off you will piss PSR in this season.

I don't think we'll have a problem.

 

[glenferry23]

I don't think we'll have a problem.

Can always create new related entities to shuffle those hotels around if Chelsea are borderline again

 

[moomba]

If all of your deadwood is flogged off you will piss PSR in this season.

I'd think sale prices for quite a few wouldn't cover the amount of amortised value, so they'd be selling at a book loss.

Suspect we'll see a few of those that haven't shone loaned out until a bit closer towards the end of their contracts.

 

[chef]

Can always create new related entities to shuffle those hotels around if Chelsea are borderline again

Yeah there's plenty of ways for the Clearlake boys to be creative.

 

[chef]

I'd think sale prices for quite a few wouldn't cover the amount of amortised value, so they'd be selling at a book loss.

Suspect we'll see a few of those that haven't shone loaned out until a bit closer towards the end of their contracts.

It's only really Kepa and Lukaku(who has a buyout for the left over amortised value) where we need to worry about book value. Majority of our sales will be academy kids.