-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
List Mgmt. Trade & Free Agency - Fred 11
- Thread starter _RT_
- Start date
- Tagged users None
What drugs are you lot on? We just finished bottom of the ladder with a historically bad 2 wins, & then lost near 1500 games of experience & replaced it with NONE. What possible reasoning do any of you have to think the team will go better???
We are laughing at names that would, EASILY, be walk up starting 18 players in our side, especially if the same old, injury prone blokes get injured again, which they have done consistently now for 3 years. If we are laughing at Markov, Stringer, MacRae, Martin, Parfitt - then the other teams must be rolling on the floor when we name Ryan, Dow, Kmac
who in the group U24 are you expecting to make a giant leap? Dow??? Ryan?? Sonsie??? Gibcus after missing 2 years??
If we took out just 4 players - Lynch, Prestia, Valustin, Kmac - then the remaining 40 players left have played a combined LESS GAMES than the blokes that that just walked out the door. What possible reasoning could anyone actually have that this team will win more games, not less? Your optimism and your reasoning don't add up
Last edited:
lol get off it, i've been over this and went through how much more experience we had on that team than we do now. And that the core of the 2017 flag team was already 2-3years into their AFL career.
you act like 2010 was some historically bad situation. it wasn't. It was a pretty stock standard "bad team" that you have a few examples of every year. We were coming off 5 1/2 wins the year before with a % of 75 & didn't have a MASS EXODUS of 5 of our top 8 players the year before. We also had Dimma in his first season coaching, a guy we now know would go on to win 3 flags. He was no joke. Yze has done exactly naught to show he has that in him. He quite frankly looked crap and boring.
Meanwhile the team Last year had TWO WINS with nearly 1500 games of experience of its BEST players walking out the door & no experience coming in.
There is exactly no comparison between the 2010 season and our upcoming 2025 season, i have no idea why you keep referring to it like it does. We won more games in 2009 that we did in 24 and didn't have a massive exodus. Only Bowden had any real form. We also lost "2 years dead" Brown, Cogs & Kane Johnson ( played just 22 games between them in 2009) + Kayne Pettifer(delisted) + Jay Schulz for a bag of peanuts before he went on to put up some great years. The side we went in to 2010 was probably better than the 2009 team purely because Jack, Cotchin, Edwards, Rance were entering their 3rd seasons & added this young guy named "Dustin". There is YADA comparison outside of your rememberries. There is NO comparison in my lifetime to the 2024-25 tigers. The situation right now IS the benchmark i will use in future tho. 2024 was easily the worst year i have encounted as a Tiger fan for enjoyment and quality of play. And we will go into next year with mostly the same team minus 7 of our best 12 players + a bunch of untried kids
Last edited:
- Aug 25, 2018
- 4,858
- 12,622
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
They’re not. If they were serious they would first look at list needs.
- Aug 25, 2018
- 4,858
- 12,622
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Taylor Hunt
Blumfeld
C Knights.
Knights is the reason you don't take an injury prone player like Jack Martin. Markov is still a Pies player. Just doing the delist dance.
Coming off a spoon, best draft eva? Use every pick & then DFA Knobel. PS draft for another slightly older player. Small fwds/defender.
Get Darcy, JUH or Cadman IN next year.
Last edited:
I think you're missing the likely strategy here by the club. We won't be taking our 8 picks as they currently stand- Blair has already said we will spread over multiple years.
If we take 8 picks this draft, it could look something like this:
Trade 10 for 13&29
Trade 18 for a F1&F2
Trade 24 for a F1,F3&45
Use the picks 1,6,11,13,20,23,29,45
That's before we even consider trading back a few places for other future 3rds which gives us a likely hand next year of:
3x Round 1 picks
2x Round 2 pick
1x Round 3 pick
We can then package up those R2&R3 picks to move up the order for academy bids or we can look to split the round 1 picks to move back or into future drafts.
Just because we said we'd bring 8 players in doesn't mean it'll be at the picks we currently have.
Last edited:
And the drafted kids play maximum games.
Gibcus played from day 1. Clarke & Sonsie next.
I would prefer to see a drafted kid playing 22 games over Membrey, Parker, Seb Ross, Stringer ~ who can play but are not the right fit for the spoon team cos of a Meehan inspired injury crisis.
Agree that period was completely different but I was fully invested and loved seeing a team full of kids out there- glimpses from Dusty and Cotch, Riewoldt coming on and kicking bags and the unknown of would Ben Nason or Relton or Griffiths be the next big thing. Would Rance stop turning it over and actually be any good. Would it all just click and we'd win a game by 50+. Just so many unknowns.
As long as the narrative by the club is right, it's actually an enjoyable time to be part of it and know you're potentially at the start of something special.
For those advocating for us to get the next Brad Miller or Taylor Hunt, there may be an opportunity to add some list cloggers at the end of next season.
If RT didn’t get overly excited about the draft we’d still have the correct spreadsheet pinned to this thread so I could tell you how many players have contracts expiring at the end of next year. I think it was around 16-18.
If we have a really poor year I can imagine half of those players might be given their marching orders and Prestia/Lynch might retire or move to another club. I doubt we’d be drafting huge numbers next year given the supposed lack of quality in the draft. So for those that love their spuds mashed, baked, roasted or deep fried, it will be the off-season for you.
In all seriousness though there is a clear reason we did not go down the recycled player path at this stage. We already have a lot of players on our list that fill the fringe player / potential list clogger role but just need the experience to prove where they belong.
If RT didn’t get overly excited about the draft we’d still have the correct spreadsheet pinned to this thread so I could tell you how many players have contracts expiring at the end of next year. I think it was around 16-18.
If we have a really poor year I can imagine half of those players might be given their marching orders and Prestia/Lynch might retire or move to another club. I doubt we’d be drafting huge numbers next year given the supposed lack of quality in the draft. So for those that love their spuds mashed, baked, roasted or deep fried, it will be the off-season for you.
In all seriousness though there is a clear reason we did not go down the recycled player path at this stage. We already have a lot of players on our list that fill the fringe player / potential list clogger role but just need the experience to prove where they belong.
- Jul 8, 2017
- 24,587
- 71,862
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Maybe stay clear of older recycled players but we should be on the look out for younger players not getting a go at other clubs. We recruited Houli and Grigg with this in mind.
- Aug 8, 2009
- 10,154
- 12,281
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Angus Sheldrick
- Aug 8, 2009
- 10,154
- 12,281
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Interesting. I wondered why there was no noise from him. Can see him cementing in that swans midfield.
Laughable. You name 2 guys that sucked that were barely making best 22 players at any point of their career. Going after recycled blokes who have never "done it" ala Hislop, a.Thomson, C.Knights. These types - ie high draft picks that we flopped - are not what im talking about at all. Its about getting established professionals that have proven they are AFL level already.
How about the next Troy Chaplin? Mark Graham? Ivan Maric? or Brian Lake, Luke Hodge, Jordan Lewis? Lots of recycled players have gone to teams rebuilding and been important in mentoring the group to eventually winning a flag.
Either way, the club has target exactly zero players with experience despite losing 1500 games of it. Its bonkers to me & one of the most clear signs of tanking going into a season i have ever seen. What we are doing is the Philadelphia 76ers Hinkey strategy asking fans to "trust the process" thank tanking will equate to elite draft picks. 76ers have won exactly NOTHING after a full decade after that process & are likely looking a full rebuild within the next 2 years. We have done no moves at all to actually improve, or even vaguely replace the talent which left. To read people thinking we will improve is wild.
I struggle to see why the club would not benefit by getting some 28-32 year olds for FREE to support the 30 players we have under the age of 22. The list is insanely unbalanced & will put money on Yze getting sacked before his contract expires. You can't build a gameplan around this
I’m not sure why we would recruit players aged between 28-32. We have 7 players in this age bracket and Hopper will enter this age bracket next year. It is not exactly the age bracket you want players in when you’re starting a rebuild.
We do have list balance issues between 24-28. The problem is the only players worth recruiting in this age bracket usually cost the most in trades. At this stage it is simply not worth spending draft capital on players in this age bracket when we are about to enter year 1 of our rebuild. Plus, those players don’t want to come to us while we are likely to spend a couple of years at the arse end of the ladder.
We’re not tanking, we tried to keep our players but they decided to leave. We’re simply not replacing the experience lost because it is not viable at this stage. We will instead add this experience to our list over the next 2-4 years as our young players develop from playing senior games, and depending on how that goes we might bring in some experienced players. If we were to bring in 2-4 players in that 28-32 age bracket we are basically throwing away experience as they would probably take up over 50 games a year on top of the senior players we already have on our list.
As for the mentoring aspect of those senior players you want to recruit, did you forget about our senior players? Prestia, Lynch, Nankervis, Hopper, Short, Taranto, Vlastuin, Broad and Balta. Premiership experience, multiple clubs experience, talented players etc. I can’t see the need to add to this group for a mentoring purpose.
You may think we are going to be abysmal next year but we are really only 3-5 very good players away from being very competitive. The only question will be where and when those players show up. The beauty of having 10 odd players not established at AFL level playing each week is sooner or later they put their hands up as quality players.
Similar threads
- Poll
