Huh? Whatta I say?‘Player Sponsors’ are a decent source, maybe B2 in the intel world.
‘Other Forums’ - F6.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Huh? Whatta I say?‘Player Sponsors’ are a decent source, maybe B2 in the intel world.
‘Other Forums’ - F6.
Send Smith to north and watch his six pack and marketing currency turn to sh*t
That article is about 40 days old. Seems unlikely his view would have changed that dramatically in 40 days especially as it's coincided with an uptick in form including Marra'sThat’s surprising since Marra said this not long ago but things change
‘He’s the man’: Bevo backed by Dogs star
A Western Bulldogs young gun has thrown his weight behind the senior coach as he revealed an interesting aspect of his contract negotiations.au.sports.yahoo.com
We received F1, pick 21 and other picks that net out to a late second/early 3rd. Together, that's worth a pick in the top 10 absolutely, especially when Brisbane's pick had a chance of being a lot better than it was before they eventually made the GF.That all makes sense until I remember what we got for Dunkley.
Rankine did not snap his ACL in twoThough a couple of years younger, Rankine went for pick 5 in a trade getting paid a similar amount relative to the salary cap than what Smith did (former pick 3). That's the framework we're operating with with Smith who was a former pick 6.
Sounds like something from a Geelong Match Committee meetingClubs: "OK, but we want a grandfathered period. You know what that is, right...?"
AFL boffins:
View attachment 2030125
I don’t think there’s much point paying players for anything much beyond their contribution to team success.If anyone thinks what Baz will be paid is for his on-field output, you’re dreaming. If another club wants to pay him a million a year for what he brings off-field, then good luck to them & their cap.
If we don’t want to go too high because the on-field means more to us than someone else, then I’ll back in the club.
But, his marketability does push us back a few steps without him.
Smith out of contract mate. Staying where he is isn’t the option.
The others, yes.
Sounds more plausible than the coalitions Nuclear policy.I have it on good authority that the Bailey Smith discussions on this board alone are currently generating enough energy to power an entire street.
Update on smith and our interest in barrass
So sweet that the salary cap exists in theory but doesn't prevent a club's major sponsor holding a deal with a player in parallel to a club agreement to totally not circumvent that limit. Very serious league.Update on smith and our interest in barrass
Im curious. What's the original source for these grabs?Update on smith and our interest in barrass
Read like Bigfooty with a superior font and a Bachelor of ArtsIm curious. What's the original source for these grabs?
Because it reads like little more than a compendium of stuff gleaned from here or places just like it. The trope about the lure of the surf coast is a real tell that it's not serious news.
Part 4 is so dumb and lacking in basic logic or an understanding of our team, that it could only have been sourced from bigfooty.
I appreciate the intel, and not suggesting it’s wrong, but I’d be hesitant in taking a player sponsors info as gospel.
I know a couple of player sponsors, and the info they get is general chit chat from the player at sponsor events.
I can’t imagine any player spilling too many beans to someone who’s literally just a supporter.
As many have pointed out, it makes little sense for clubs to be offering Smith in excess of a million per year - turning him into a top 100, top 75 paid player in the league - but look to offer less than a top 10 or edge of the top 10 pick.
One links with the other. If a given club lowballs a trade, the Dogs can reasonably question why the club would rate him so highly to pay that in their salary cap.
Though a couple of years younger, Rankine went for pick 5 in a trade getting paid a similar amount relative to the salary cap than what Smith did (former pick 3). That's the framework we're operating with with Smith who was a former pick 6.
Or maybe, you know, just be able to say to the player:...
A club with a gun player who wants out will almost always lose the trade, unless the player declines greatly in ability or they pick up an unexpected star in the draft. The thing to focus on is creating an environment that players don't want to leave.
Lol. Smith was awesome before his headbutt in 2022. The wheels fell off a touch after but he showed when Liber or Treloar were out he is a gun mid.Baz wants to go for midfield opportunities he believes he has a right too (which he has yet to show for us) when the real reason is the extra $350k-$400k per year being offered, play and simple.
I think all the talk comes from his barracking as a kid but kids change allegiances most times when they join a new club. Media will latch onto anything to make a story.While they might be the best to deal with in regards to picks, why are Hawthorn into Smith?
They’ve got a stack of young midfieid options and are seemingly crying out for key position talent.
Sam Mitchell (like Clarko) also seems to favour those that excel by foot.
So they’re now all in on a 23-24yo who can murder the pill when kicking and the same guy had his worst season before doing a knee.
I’m not buying it.
It’ll be Geelong or Smith signs with us until FA.