hlnbidoffer
Rookie
- Mar 16, 2022
- 47
- 151
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
I don't understand why the club reportedly bends over to English's "demands" to play as a one out ruckman, yet when Dunkley isn't signed, we didn't play him where he wanted?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Industry sources say the Port Adelaide offer is considered more attractive than the Lions offer. But that does not mean he will choose to head west, rather than north, to continue his career if he wants a fresh start after a request to join Essendon at the end of 2020 was denied when the Bombers refused to give up two first round picks for him.Sorry, don't have access to the Age, so only start of article - but I thought the 'desperate' was interesting....if he was staying he would have signed already, don't you think?
Decision day looms for Bulldogs’ son of a gun
By Peter Ryan
September 4, 2022 — 6.59pm
Western Bulldogs coach Luke Beveridge says the club is desperate to re-sign midfielder Josh Dunkley as he weighs up his options after his season ended on Saturday with the loss to Fremantle.
The 25-year-old midfielder has had a long-term offer on the table from the club for close to two months, however he has attracted significant interest from both Port Adelaide and the Brisbane Lions.
I love the complaints about English playing where he wants yet when its Dunks or West its PLAY THEM WHERE THEY WANT!
West's form over his last 6 games were worthy of dropping, Garcia and Scott were both in better VFL form and should've been in ahead of him and Vandermeer.Don’t think many are saying play West wherever he wants, it’s just play him anywhere rather than not.
Given the wide gap in the performances in their “preferred” positions over the years, I don’t think arguing for Dunkley to be played as a midfielder and arguing for English to be played as a ruck are equitable. Game on the weekend was case in point. If Dunkley had been inconsistent and frequently outpointed as a midfielder then there would be merit to the comparison.
West's form over his last 6 games were worthy of dropping, Garcia and Scott were both in better VFL form and should've been in ahead of him and Vandermeer.
Whilst Libba was fit Dunkley was always going to be the odd one out, the talk with him rucking was an issue from 2 years ago and he only did it predominately for 1 match which we won due to that tactic. If either leave it's up to them but especially in regard to West it's not the coaches fault at all he played 14 games and was dropped due to poor form to end the year thats on him not the coach or MC
I get what you mean, but we went away from our best structure (Tim playing 50/50 ruck fwd) to play Tim purely ruck as that’s “what he wanted”.
Dunks is a mid. A really good one too. We’ve played him less minutes there, plus ruck, plus key marking forward. It’s a combination of Bevo and also list management. It’s not purely on coach.
West gets dropped and then we play players ahead of him that are clearly out of form or not up to it. Again, that’s on coach for mine.
I stand by my current thoughts that losing West (due to selection) and losing Dunks (due to on field positioning) will be a complete fail by the club and coach.
Yes Vandermeer shouldn't have been selected we all agree on that again for the 400th time Garcia and Scott were both ahead of West anywayWest’s worst was still better than Vandermeer’s best. That’s where the issue lies when one is still selected over the other.
We finally get a forward who can kick 50 goals in a season and we want to send him backFor those suggesting sending Naughton back, i think you will find he sees himself as a forward and doesnt want to play back.
Obviously I’m not going to lose my shit early haha but just the vibe of it all stinks atm, let’s see how it turns outJeepers, log off for a few days haha.
So what, this is the sort of mentality that needs to change. Its up to the coaches to decide where he plays, not Naughton.For those suggesting sending Naughton back, i think you will find he sees himself as a forward and doesnt want to play back.
English has never said he wanted to be a one out ruckman.I don't understand why the club reportedly bends over to English's "demands" to play as a one out ruckman, yet when Dunkley isn't signed, we didn't play him where he wanted?
West's form over his last 6 games were worthy of dropping, Garcia and Scott were both in better VFL form and should've been in ahead of him and Vandermeer.
Whilst Libba was fit Dunkley was always going to be the odd one out, the talk with him rucking was an issue from 2 years ago and he only did it predominately for 1 match which we won due to that tactic. If either leave it's up to them but especially in regard to West it's not the coaches fault at all he played 14 games and was dropped due to poor form to end the year thats on him not the coach or MC
Dude if we ******* lose West I am going to be absolutely ropable, that would be genuinely unforgivable
got to be something wrong at the club.
Have massivley under achieved this year.
Dunkley considering leaving for only an offer of around 650k. Surely we could match that deal or at least be within 50k a year and offer the same term. Not many players would even consider moving interstate for that difference.
Think we must have issues behind the scenes
Pretty sure he has. In the few times we have played Martin or Sweet with him English never starts in the forward line.English has never said he wanted to be a one out ruckman.
Yep. His manager came out and said as much during last off season, about how he wasn't happy with his lack of ruck time when we bought Martin in.Pretty sure he has. In the few times we have played Martin or Sweet with him English never starts in the forward line.
His manager made a comment before the season started that English was looking forward to having more of a ruck role. Somehow people on here have turned it into English demanding he play in the ruck. It is not true. But I stand to be corrected if can provide the quote from English where he says he wants to only play in the ruck.Pretty sure he has. In the few times we have played Martin or Sweet with him English never starts in the forward line.
Yep, I mean it was only round 15 he kicked 3.3 from 20 touches, 15PAs, 5 tackles, 3 goal assists & 13 of his touches were SI’s, 3 tackles i50I don't remember West's form being particularly bad.
Personally I think it's a narrative being spun to excuse poor selection integrity.
His manager made a comment before the season started that English was looking forward to having more of a ruck role. Somehow people on here have turned it into English demanding he play in the ruck. It is not true. But I stand to be corrected if can provide the quote from English where he says he wants to only play in the ruck.
I don't remember West's form being particularly bad.
Personally I think it's a narrative being spun to excuse poor selection integrity.