Roast The Non Goal: F*** the AFL, court injunction?

What compensation will we receive from the AFL?


  • Total voters
    168

Remove this Banner Ad

Whose to say Sydney dont kick a goal in the last 40 seconds to regain the lead had it been called a goal? I'd be making a hell of a lot of noise about this but no point trying to challenge the result.
It's like you know the Crows
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Dark days for the AFL if they let this stand
Meh, there will be another controversy somewhere else and it will be forgotten by Tuesday.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I don't disagree with your statement, but the reason for the loss was not due to umpiring, not due to the fact the Keays point was not reviewed, and not due to some supporters supposedly thinking that the AFL wanted the Swans in the finals.

The blame for this loss was on our selection, on our pathetic effort in the first half, and our poor kicking for goal in the last quarter when the game YET AGAIN was on the line.
Apart from the fact we kicked the goal to goal ahead and thus win the game
 
So corruption against the Crows isn't the reason the goal wasn't paid.

Not sure sarcasm or not. But the umpire I think got conned by a swans player claiming it touched the post because the umpire was blinded to it. It was a howler and it should have been reviewed.
 
Back
Top