Agree. Using points is a frustrating way of evaluating trades unless a club is actually using points.Let me say it again:
Points don’t ******* matter if you aren’t taking an academy or father-son.
The obsession with them is stupid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agree. Using points is a frustrating way of evaluating trades unless a club is actually using points.Let me say it again:
Points don’t ******* matter if you aren’t taking an academy or father-son.
The obsession with them is stupid.
Mitch Cleary saying that we wont be putting a bid on Tom Green which then looks unlikely we will split our pick 3.
I really hope Saints don't trade 2 firsts for Brad Hill, it is ridiculous asking price. Particularly since they are likely to be top 10 picks from the sound of things. Don't want to encourage Bell to keep being a w***er.
They don't have 6 anymore.Am I reading this right? Going by the reports with a three way trade. Saints give up 6 and next years first for Hill Howard and Ryder. Not bad really. I think Ryder is just about cooked but I rate Hill and Howard has some real potential.
wtf why would we reveal that lolMitch Cleary saying that we wont be putting a bid on Tom Green which then looks unlikely we will split our pick 3.
**** me, that's a massive risk if true.Jon Ralph reporting we are trading 2020 1st, 26 and 50 for Norths pick 8.
fu** me, that's a massive risk if true.
fu** me, that's a massive risk if true.
Yep, potentially a top 5 pick at this point. Norf should be just about snapping Mahoney's hand off shaking on that one. So hard-nosed.
This tweet doesn't make sense. Even if we won the flag next year North would win on points value. There's no risk associated with it for them?
So why can't we just take non-academy players? Is there no Anderson/Ash/Serong/Kemp etc next year? Surely we can extract more value for our 2020 pick if clubs will need it to match bids?It’s to do with the compromised draft. We’re not in line for anything.
So why can't we just take non-academy players? Is there no Anderson/Ash/Serong/Kemp etc next year? Surely we can extract more value for our 2020 pick if clubs will need it to match bids?
Well as a whole I meant. Should have clarified. 6 is now 12+18They don't have 6 anymore.
Jon Ralph reporting we are trading 2020 1st, 26 and 50 for Norths pick 8.
Still doesn't make sense other than some statistical fluke where there are just no good players next year in the states of Victoria, SA, and WA who aren't attached to an academy.Because 11 of the expected top 20 are associated with other clubs. If we finish last and hold 1&2 with a PP , we may only be getting a players worth 13 & 14.