
- Jul 19, 2010
- 27,667
- 74,929
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
What’s happened with Sheezel this year.
Thought you said Cheezel for a minute there. Still having nightmares.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Geelong v Melbourne - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Cats at 80% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
LIVE: Geelong v Melbourne - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Cats at 80% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
What’s happened with Sheezel this year.
YepWhere was he playing last year? Of half back wasn’t he?
I’m guessing you didn’t roll out of bed this morning.Thought you said Cheezel for a minute there. Still having nightmares.
Surely he’s the top of the pile thoughThis is the problem you get when a team spends years only drafting midfielders
Bucketload of talent and only going to get much better this year with 2 x first rounders inc Powers likely top 6-7 pick. And their 3 likely first round academy kidsProblem is Suns have 2 202cm monster forwards, and King is very quick on the lead, not to mention the 195cm absolute brutish Jed Walter, we'll need to at least break even in the midfield to be a chance IMO and that will be no mean task with the 208cm Jarrod Witts with Rowell, Anderson, Miller at his feet as well as Flanders, Humphrey who usually have a run on ball at times.
Surely he’s the top of the pile though
The main problem, also picked up by the commentators, is the confident lies that thay tell when justifying their decision.Just once I want him to protest over the loud speaker
“Nope, sorry. Not clear enough. Get better technology”
That was the highlight of the day for me, especially as it happened right in front of where I was seated. Just brilliant commitment and effort by the boys... and man, doesn't Draper have elite speed!Two little things from yesterday .....
THE FUTURE - on display
Third quarter highlight - Curtin beats three NM players to gather ball, dribble kick to Thillthorpe who handballs to Draper - GOAL
The main problem, also picked up by the commentators, is the confident lies that thay tell when justifying their decision.
It's worse this year. Normally, with crap footage, they would say that there was no definitive evidence and revert to the goal ump's decision. Now, their form of words is "looking at those angles (even with no angles involved) it is clear that the ball deviates (or is touched by the defender)", even with crap blurry footage where it is clearly a lie.
Saying something often enough makes it true.
What about if we have both? Rely on the stupid umpire and have the shitty technology there doing nothing (aka Ben Keays goal).I would rather live with human error than put up with the current state of the video umpire. It’s a f*cking embarrassment to the sport.
Ugly: Feel sorry for anyone who had to listen to BT
Didn’t they stop the game for the Daicos cramping?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fog said immediately that it had hit the post. Like walking in cricket - that should be enough, no need for a formal review, get on with the game.
Yeah agreed - the htb was not on him at all (just an all round shit call)The holding the ball against him was a total raffle though. Immediately preceded by several other rolls of the dice on tackles, and the worlds most random adjudication of a 15m kick.
It's like they flipped a coin 5 times in a row, came up with north every time and then went "well then! That deserves a goal".
However he was not great when he needed to tackle. Parker just threw him off and they got a goal from it. Can't be having that.
Underwhelming (not good, not bad) is a good descriptor for his rd 1 game, but I felt he was great last week as well. Hit the contest really hard and made his presence felt. Very clean also.He was brilliant against North.
Felt he was underwhelming without being bad the first two games.
Round 3: 7 Marks, 6 score involvements, 8 intercepts, 512 Metres gained, 8 Rebound 50's.
Rounds 1&2 combined: 7 Marks, 8 score involvements, 9 intercepts, 463 metres gained, 5 rebound 50's.
Nah, it was funny when Jenkins thought it hit the post but was over ruled in the Showdown
He was an idiot for admitting that too.
"Oh, he must have some vision from different angles that we can't see."The main problem, also picked up by the commentators, is the confident lies that thay tell when justifying their decision.
It's worse this year. Normally, with crap footage, they would say that there was no definitive evidence and revert to the goal ump's decision. Now, their form of words is "looking at those angles (even with no angles involved) it is clear that the ball deviates (or is touched by the defender)", even with crap blurry footage where it is clearly a lie.
Saying something often enough makes it true.
It looks like they're trying to give a spread to a lot of players rather then focusing on who is best in the midfield
All of LDU, Powell, Phillips, Simpkin and Sheezel got CBAs - plus Parker who they recruited. Then on top of that, McKercher and O'Sullivan are also mids but playing elsewhere, and Wardlaw is injured.
There's quality there but also too many of the same types. Do they really need to play both Powell and Phillips? And Parker in there plus both of those guys?
Other than Logan McDonald in 2020 that they overlooked, have there been any highly rated KPP to actually pick though? At the pointy end you kinda have to go best available.