I was thinking about this the other day...
I remember in 2004, Mark Williams did a lot of talking early in the season and preseason about empowering the on field leadership and also the wider playing group and almost taking a slight step back in terms of constant pressure and micromanagement. When we won that year, I remember thinking that was an early indicator and a hallmark of a team about to hit it's absolute peak. I think generally, the path of a coach and a playing group tends to go like this:
Tough love & breaking bad habits > Establishing the news norms and "style" > Leaders emerge and establish consistency > Trust between coach and playing group is 100% embedded > Coach empowers playing group > Success > Either the fire still burns or group is satisfied > Players grow too comfortable and abuse trust > Because of the success and established relationship the coach's judgement is compromised > Gold passes, playing / staying too long, downhill from here
I expect that to a degree, Josh will need to start from stage one. We call this a succession plan, but it's not really (at least I hope not). It's basically a way for the club to do what it's too compromised to do in a way that it saves face. I would hope there's a little Josh can carry over, but I really hope there's a lot he doesn't. Pragmatically we need to treat Josh like a year 1 coach while in the long term judging the club for decision and method.
I remember in 2004, Mark Williams did a lot of talking early in the season and preseason about empowering the on field leadership and also the wider playing group and almost taking a slight step back in terms of constant pressure and micromanagement. When we won that year, I remember thinking that was an early indicator and a hallmark of a team about to hit it's absolute peak. I think generally, the path of a coach and a playing group tends to go like this:
Tough love & breaking bad habits > Establishing the news norms and "style" > Leaders emerge and establish consistency > Trust between coach and playing group is 100% embedded > Coach empowers playing group > Success > Either the fire still burns or group is satisfied > Players grow too comfortable and abuse trust > Because of the success and established relationship the coach's judgement is compromised > Gold passes, playing / staying too long, downhill from here
I expect that to a degree, Josh will need to start from stage one. We call this a succession plan, but it's not really (at least I hope not). It's basically a way for the club to do what it's too compromised to do in a way that it saves face. I would hope there's a little Josh can carry over, but I really hope there's a lot he doesn't. Pragmatically we need to treat Josh like a year 1 coach while in the long term judging the club for decision and method.
Last edited: