She isnt an apologist, she's just not prepared to take the popular view. I expect or to be tough, if not I'll be disappointedHighly doubt it. She's an apologist it seems and hand selected.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She isnt an apologist, she's just not prepared to take the popular view. I expect or to be tough, if not I'll be disappointedHighly doubt it. She's an apologist it seems and hand selected.
Exactly.... Dean was rather jab happy without any qualifications to do so... would have thought that would be enough had the club been allowed to charge him in court.Lol, didn't Hird get some injections on site?
she is a moron of the highest order - who cares about her motiveShe isnt an apologist, she's just not prepared to take the popular view. I expect or to be tough, if not I'll be disappointed
Clearly ab apologist just listen to her last interview.She isnt an apologist, she's just not prepared to take the popular view. I expect or to be tough, if not I'll be disappointed
Hird wanted 'redacted' boner issues removed from the Federal Court Case.Lol, didn't Hird get some injections on site?
She isnt an apologist, she's just not prepared to take the popular view. I expect or to be tough, if not I'll be disappointed
No. It doesn't actually spell that out.It never says he went from Hird to Thompson though.
The reason Hird was in the discussion was because he wanted Robinson fired, while Bomber wanted to retain him. It wasnt a battle over who wanted to be in charge. Interestingly Bomber is clearly a big fan of Robinson but not HirdNo. It doesn't actually spell that out.
But I was comfortably satisfied, that seen as it was a stoush between Hird and Bomber, that was the case. Not much of a leap.
Exactly.... Dean was rather jab happy without any qualifications to do so... would have thought that would be enough had the club been allowed to charge him in court.
Seems like he was happy to administer to anyone close to him, including his pregnant wife...
Ummm not the case at all.... The club put him in place of administering a suppliments program. very different to giving him the authority to give injections... He had no authority to give injections, although we know that he didnt follow this.Dank had no qualifications to do so either but the club put him in charge of an injection program
Dank had no qualifications to do so either but the club put him in charge of an injection program
They are already in smarter hands
SuperFooty (AFL)
@superfooty
Essendon coach John Worsfold says he won’t read tell-all by Bombers predecessor James Hird bit.ly/2033Vdn pic.twitter.com/VV62obuCwP
SuperFooty (AFL)
@superfooty
Essendon coach John Worsfold says he won’t read tell-all by Bombers predecessor James Hird bit.ly/2033Vdn pic.twitter.com/VV62obuCwP
"The truth was I realllllllllly wanted that vacation in France but I had just signed on to coach Essendon. What was a guy to do?"So the truth was "I didn't do it". That was the truth that was going to be revealed and save our players?
Plenty of reasons that the club could stand him down. He had already have his power removed at the end of 2012. Plenty of dodgy actions associate this bloke... but the AFL moved too quickly, demanded he be removed and then just needed it to go away as it was a case they didnt need at that time.
Dank was one of his direct reports... that is probably enough it itself.
Administering drugs to employees onsite is probably another
A terrible year of injuries would be enough in itself.
I would say Hirds testimony was treated with the disdain it deserved, if the crap he's currently sprouting is anything to go by. I would say they re interviewed Dean four times because he's not the sharpest tool in the shed, and they could trip him up.He and Bock will get that notice when ASADA get around to it.....
With respect to the essendon case... Robinson has spoken.... 4 times to ASADA in fact as they loved what he had to say as it supported the direction that they wanted to head with the interim report. Hird was interviewed once BTW... STRANGE????
See this is where you are getting confused. You think people believe Dean Robinson over James Hird. When the truth is, we put them both on the same level. Equally untrustworthy.Ummmmm because Hird and the club respected the process... get Dank, Robinson and Charters were not restricted by the club or AFL. Robinson also spoke out for cash. He has also received a massive payout from the AFL and ESS. So here is a bloke who is happy to make $$$ off the back of loss by all other parties in the sad affair. Quality individual we have there.... then again probably what you would expect from a bloke who was happy to inject players, support staff and his own family with suppliments! Oh and then of course lets not forget selling CJC to AFL footballers and instructing them on how to administer.