- Nov 22, 2014
- 995
- 1,499
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Can this troll be banned? It's not funny, it's just tedious.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Western Bulldogs v Sydney - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Dogs at 55% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 11
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
North Melbourne's last five years of drafts have started:
2019: Pick 31
2020: Pick 3
2021: Pick 1 (Already left the club)
2022: Pick 3
2023: Pick 2
And that's one of the historically worst teams we've seen in ages whose supporters are understandably sick of being crap, yet despite all this they've only managed to grab the single pick 1 in that five year stretch in JHF who left to Port after one year. But apparently your Tiggies are looking at collecting the next FIVE pick 1s in a row?
It feels like clubs are starting to realise this now too - letting the bottom of your club fall out for some magic beans can do more harm than good. Especially with how compromised the draft is with F/S and academy stuff nowadays you can be the worst team in the comp but end up with the 3rd most talented junior, only to find out his game doesn't translate to the elite level and you've spent an entire year at the bottom for nothing. You still need a sputtering of elite players which for rebuilding clubs the only way to really get your hands on them is through the draft, but the days of trying to build an entire team out of top 10 picks looks to be over outside of the expansion teams.just getting top 5-10 picks year after year be a golden ticket, be taken seriously when all the data suggests that those players are just as likely to be either mediocre as they are to be superstars?
I’m talking about top 5 picks not 10.I love how Falcon on the one hand thinks top 10 picks are guaranteed guns and then dismisses Jhye Clark (pick 8) because he hasn't dominated in his first 5 games.
Press “Ignore”Can this troll be banned? It's not funny, it's just tedious.
Worked for us hawks and you guys with Hawkins.It feels like clubs are starting to realise this now too - letting the bottom of your club fall out for some magic beans can do more harm than good. Especially with how compromised the draft is with F/S and academy stuff nowadays you can be the worst team in the comp but end up with the 3rd most talented junior, only to find out his game doesn't translate to the elite level and you've spent an entire year at the bottom for nothing. You still need a sputtering of elite players which for rebuilding clubs the only way to really get your hands on them is through the draft, but the days of trying to build an entire team out of top 10 picks looks to be over outside of the expansion teams.
The simple fact that North, as bad as they've been in recent years, have only been able to grab the consensus #1 junior a single time is crazy.
I’m talking about top 5 picks not 10.
After 5 it’s speculation really. Like Clark, hope you didn’t pick a dud with it.
You seem super obsessed with Geelong's 2022 draftee five-gamer pick 8 Jhye Clark when I reckon there'd be far more concern over Richmond's 2021 pick 9 Josh Gibcus who's about to miss a second straight year and potentially being one of those perenially injured types. We just hope you didn't pick a dud with it. Van Rooyen would've been a nice understudy to Lynch at the minute I bet.After 5 it’s speculation really. Like Clark, hope you didn’t pick a dud with it.
Nothing is guaranteed but who would have a better chance of getting then
A team getting pick 1, 5 years in a row or a team with pick 17, 5 years in a row. This is what is going to happen with our two clubs. The gulf of talent will be huge. Our second round pick will be pretty much as good as your first rounder too.
Yeah but in the year 2062, we’ll be good and you’ll be bad.
Am I doing it right?
Whatever will we do without top-5 picks at the draft?
Now this WILL be a conundrum for the cats recruitment staff, something new for us to deal with after only going 34 years without a top 5 pick. Not sure how we will navigate this period going forward.
Don't think so.Bulldogs midfield >>>>>>> port midfield.
And we knocked them off…
Imagine The Beatles signing a record deal and basically saying ‘who cares about this album the only one that matters will be the one that comes out in 10 years time. We will just write s**t songs for now and hope we get some inspiration by then.’
The bigger the pride the harder the fall. Good, let’s see how you go.
Most of there songs are s**t except for yellow submarine.
Is your issue that you don't find him attractive?Who’s doing the robbing exactly?
It’s got nothing to do with pride. Your sheer level of vitriol and and desire to see failure in a sporting organisation is like nothing I’ve ever witnessed on a sports forum realistically. Observing trends and past patterns has nothing to do with pride I’m sorry to tell you.
Um, yeah. Good one.
Is your issue that you don't find him attractive?
Ah that’s why you get so annoyed you think I think that. I just call it as it is, like with the Clark stats, which you guys also hated.
No it’s arrogance to think you can beat the system. It’s not a hard concept to grasp, over the long term better picks get you better players, if you do not draft enough good players you cannot contend. Imagine you didn’t have Hawkins, you probably wouldn’t have one 2022.
Nah legit the Beatles is my top overrated band of all time. All their songs are whiny nonsense that’s sound the exact same.
I didn’t even comment on the Clark stats. He’s played 5 games
It’s not arrogance to think we can beat the system. We’ve already done it. Not sure where the arrogance is to think we can do something we’ve already done.
Two clubs have been beating it for 25 years, another club (Collingwood) you could argue has probably been doing it as well.
Imagine we didn’t have Hawkins. So what. Every piece of available evidence suggests we would have found a way to fill that void in some other capacity. Would we have won that flag? Maybe not, who knows: it’s a hypothetical question.
As a club who hasn’t had a top 5 pick in 34 seasons, never missed the finals more than 3 years in a row, but has made 10 grand finals, won four flags, and averaged a preliminary final one in every TWO years during that period - yes, we have made 17 preliminary finals in 34 seasons without a top 5 draft pick - I think our method is fairly sound.
But no, you’re way more up with this than the Geelong method
The Geelong method didn’t work to well with your best ever player in it did it?
You’ve taken a small sample size an extrapolated it out to infinity. That’s what children do.