Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 3 * Coroner's Hearings Concluded

[Kurve]

Continued from PART 2

Criminal charges:

• Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
• 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
• 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
• Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
• Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty

TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone

Please type names out in full for those who are not covered by suppression orders.

For those covered by suppression orders, please use the following to indicate:

FM - Foster Mother
FF - Foster Father
FGM - Foster Grandmother
FD - Foster Daughter
FPs - Foster Parents

Up to you if you wish to refer to them as former fosters but please write it in full, strictly using the above. No deviations.

Other initials posters will use informally but should not are:

BCR - Batar Creek Road
FA - Frank Abbott
MW - Michelle White
SFR - Strike Force Rosann
AMS - Anne Maree Sharpley
CCR - Cobb and Co Road
GO - Geoff Owens
One even reduced bike riding to - BR
COG - Consciousness of guilt. Like WHO KNEW?

 

[Angry Red Bull]

Yes. I read the same issues entirely. She slipped up that she was usually up at 7.30 then immediately redirects to what was rehearsed that she was actually up late almost same sentence!!! Bear in mind she was woken by the kids going into her room?? Did that
happen late? I don't think so

Conclusion : she was up early but lied

She has to be up late so that she failed to see FF and if she was up late it also means that the picture on the verandah with her in the chair has to be after FF left and legitimise the 9.37 time.

in effect they are using her being up late and not seeing FF to make clear disconnect and therefore legitimise the 9.37 photo. Omg that is ingenious. Use a geriatric to create the alibi.

I know I'm left field but I'm being taken where THEY lead me with their lies and deception. You see it's impossible that the photo was earlier IF FF was already gone and FGM didn't see him nor get up early.

You only lie about stuff that's important to hide the truth. 8 to 9 isn't supposed to be important but is if it legitimises the alibi of 9.37 pho

Yes. I read the same issues entirely. She slipped up that she was usually up at 7.30 then immediately redirects to what was rehearsed that she was actually up late almost same sentence!!! Bear in mind she was woken by the kids going into her room?? Did that
happen late? I don't think so

Conclusion : she was up early but lied

She has to be up late so that she failed to see FF and if she was up late it also means that the picture on the verandah with her in the chair has to be after FF left and legitimise the 9.37 time.

in effect they are using her being up late and not seeing FF to make clear disconnect and therefore legitimise the 9.37 photo. Omg that is ingenious. Use a geriatric to create the alibi.

I know I'm left field but I'm being taken where THEY lead me with their lies and deception. You see it's impossible that the photo was earlier IF FF was already gone and FGM didn't see him nor get up early.

You only lie about stuff that's important to hide the truth. 8 to 9 isn't supposed to be important but is if it legitimises the alibi of 9.37 photo

I've steadfastly maintained I think the FGM walk through and errors are a window to solving this crime.

They used the lie of her being up late and FF having already supposedly left to legitimise that which I believe to be a lie.......the timestamp of 9.37. Take that out of the picture and the death and hiding could have happened any time. The effect of that is that the body was outside the search area which we now know by virtue of cadaver evidence that it is.

So what did neighbours hear? Perhaps just one parent with FD not 2.

What was purpose of FM car trip immediately prior to search? To throw shoes away perhaps.