Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * Coroners Inquiry CANCELLED!

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reader mode
Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges:
  • Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
  • 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
  • Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty
TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone

Please type names out in full for those who are not covered by suppression orders.

For those covered by suppression orders, please use the following to indicate:

FM - Foster Mother
FF - Foster Father
FGM - Foster Grandmother
FD - Foster Daughter
FPs - Foster Parents

Up to you if you wish to refer to them as former fosters but please write it in full, strictly using the above. No deviations.

Other initials posters will use informally but should not are:

BCR - Batar Creek Road
FA - Frank Abbott
MW - Michelle White
SFR - Strike Force Rosann
AMS - Anne Maree Sharpley
CCR - Cobb and Co Road
GO - Geoff Owens
One even reduced bike riding to - BR :rolleyes:
COG - Consciousness of guilt. Like WHO KNEW?
 
Last edited:
Kurve said:
Maybe that's what they want us to think too.

I personally can't see the 'good' in this podcast right now, it's purpose seems a bit shady.
Click to expand...

Just to play with the benefit of the doubt a bit longer - maybe that is then meant to lead us to re-considering how and why this investigation has been so unsuccessful?
 
Kurve said:
Maybe that's what they want us to think too.

I personally can't see the 'good' in this podcast right now, it's purpose seems a bit shady.
Click to expand...
Personally, I think the podcast is overconfident. It’s comparing Jubelin’s charges and conviction in public against others and alleging that FM became a person of interest after she spoke out against police.
Why so bold when no one knows what evidence police have?
 
Underarrest_ said:
Personally, I think the podcast is overconfident. It’s comparing Jubelin’s charges and conviction in public against others and alleging that FM became a person of interest after she spoke out against police.
Why so bold when no one knows what evidence police have?
Click to expand...

The podcast is 100% deliberate and structured to AGAIN make the public LOOK THE OTHER WAY!
Well I guess if they're all on the Titanic together, you know what ultimately happens...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The podcast is not there to solve the case.
The podcast is there to generate interest and clicks, and sell advertising, and merchandise.

To do this it needs interesting content, not necessarily facts or truths, just content. The only people providing this content currently are the fosters. Sure there is the inquest and official sources like police, but they aren't saying much and it's actually hard work doing genuine investigation or journalism. A lot easier to package up some cheap video footage of the fosters peddling their various narratives, and Jubelin having a whinge or taking potshots. Or slagging off the bios. They will present whatever is easiest and if it's controversial, then all the better. Never let the truth get in the way of a good story. Here's some links to our other podcasts, and here's where you can buy our books....

Solving the case is killing the goose that lays golden eggs.
 
Underarrest_ said:
Personally, I think the podcast is overconfident. It’s comparing Jubelin’s charges and conviction in public against others and alleging that FM became a person of interest after she spoke out against police.
Why so bold when no one knows what evidence police have?
Click to expand...

Haven't found it yet, I will but I remember what it was specifically.

At the time the FM criticized the police, she knew that she'd been locked out of getting any information through the investigation, the cops weren't cooperating with her. I think she already knew they were going for her.

imo.
 
Exactly where did the MFC go on the morning of Saturday September 13th before 6am before the local policeperson rocked up?

MFC says he went out searching, just where did he search? Why come Tuesday 15th he'd given up looking for William and didn't go searching? What just gave up did he? I mean wouldn't you want to at least find his body and lay him to rest if he'd wandered off into the bush?

Again no one buys it after 10 years, time to face real FACS! Nervous are we??
 
Underarrest_ said:
Personally, I think the podcast is overconfident. It’s comparing Jubelin’s charges and conviction in public against others and alleging that FM became a person of interest after she spoke out against police.
Why so bold when no one knows what evidence police have?
Click to expand...

It starts about here:

 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Wallace52 said:
It’s a long bow to draw.

What is going on with that podcast? I feel like they’re trying to throw shade at the alleged drink driver, but why??
Click to expand...
It's not such a long bow.
What if the drink driver was a senior cop who had a hand in Jubelin's downfall?
 
Here we all are taking William’s disappearance seriously. We are still prepared to look at every angle.

We jump on each other to keep us honest.

These b……..tds have another agenda.
Tromp tromp tromp over decency.

I think every one is getting ready to sue and are fighting to be the one who ends up on top.

It will be very interesting to see what the coroner’s office finds.
 
Let’s not forget that if the case(s) that were sitting with the ODPP ever do go to trial, there might be a jury, and it only requires one person on that jury to have reasonable doubt for the accused to be found “not guilty.”

IMHO, Witness the podcast is saturating the NSW collective conscience with “reasonable doubt”. Oh maybe the FM didn’t do it because reasonable doubt.

Every episode alludes to a new theory or person who might be interesting; such as a dodgy, smelly man who hordes and is in jail for CSO, a former suspect who claimed a million dollars compo for malicious prosecution, or a bio grandma who says something that’s taken out of context, and it’s turned into a sound grab.

Whilst at the same time, they’re undermining the NSW police who are in the middle of a Coronial Inquest into the suspected death of a 3 year old child.

They may as well have called it “Gary Strikes Back”, “Reasonable Doubt” or “NSW Cops Suck” because to me, those are the three main messages or motifs that carry through the episodic threads, and they sure as heck haven’t been able to track down a Witness yet. Heck, they can’t even track down William’s biological mother.

IMO
 
Last edited:
Oh what a tangle web we weave …but if just one strand of thread breaks the web will spring back and entrap the spider.
Let’s hope there is some one prepared to snap that thread. 🕷️
 
31550 said:
It's not such a long bow.
What if the drink driver was a senior cop who had a hand in Jubelin's downfall?
Click to expand...
Is this podcast about retribution for GJ and FPs? Is this podcast about solving William’s disappearance? Who ‘benefits’ in this case by exposing a drink driving cop? The podcast IMO, has been disappointing and seems increasingly spiteful and vengeful rather than seeking the truth.
 
Underarrest_ said:
Personally, I think the podcast is overconfident. It’s comparing Jubelin’s charges and conviction in public against others and alleging that FM became a person of interest after she spoke out against police.
Why so bold when no one knows what evidence police have?
Click to expand...

The one person who categorically knows what evidence they can possibly have, is the FM.

Being confident and bold might suggest that GJ is backing his own judgement after 4 years leading the investigation. He also knows there are several other POI's who haven't been eliminated. He would be very confident they have no evidence, because his team looked in all the same places previously.
 
Poppy Penny said:
Is this podcast about retribution for GJ and FPs? Is this podcast about solving William’s disappearance? Who ‘benefits’ in this case by exposing a drink driving cop? The podcast IMO, has been disappointing and seems increasingly spiteful and vengeful rather than seeking the truth.
Click to expand...
You do know it's Jubelin's podcast?

It's always going to be in HIS best interest.
 
Reader mode
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

Kurve
Current Disappearance of 19yo Jay Slater - Tenerife
Replies
18
Views
883
A11dAtP0w3R
A11dAtP0w3R
Kurve
Unsolved The Disappearance of Mum Bronwyn Winfield - NSW * Hedley Thomas podcast
2 3 4 5
Replies
116
Views
7K
BFew
BFew
Kurve
The Disappearance of 12yo Lisa Mott - WA
Replies
10
Views
2K
Eaglette01
E
Kurve
Unsolved Disappearance Murder of 14yo Marilyn Wallman of McKay - INQUEST
Replies
20
Views
1K
Bunk Moreland
Bunk Moreland
Redacted
Marion Barter disappearance 1997 referred to homicide detectives
Replies
0
Views
456
Redacted
Redacted
Kurve
Unsolved Disappearance of 5yo Summer Wells from rural home
Replies
4
Views
937
Poppy Penny
P
Kurve
Unsolved LGBTQ+ NSW Hate Crime Inquiry
Replies
6
Views
1K
BFew
BFew

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top