Autopsy Crows hammer Saints by 63 in round 1

Remove this Banner Ad

A heap of guys like Jones and Clark are taking the piss. Get contract extensions and go half arsed again. I’d tell them both that they’ve played their last senior games until they raise their standards. Make them earn their spot back off a kid.
They were both clearly playing at like 80%. Just think Ross wanted some experience.
 
Phillipou isn’t in that bracket nor Owens and Henry. The players we are missing are between 23 and 27.

Nah the bracket was dudes between 20 and 100 games - those in the range where they can really improve fast.

They're the ones we'll rely on to have a good year, and they're the ones who are mostly injured.
 
Our best players are Wilkie, Marshall, Macrae, Sinclair. None are mediocre, but all are in the final stages of the careers though.

We got a few good experienced guys as every club does, but on the whole that group is mediocre.

Can't really win games consistently with a relatively low quality group of experienced guys, and a thin and injured group of midrange guys.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Everyone knows that going to the football is all about sophistication and only the bogan chav unsophisticated wear footy jumpers

you have your ideas, i have mine. ( and ai agrees with me but is too stupid to get the jumper right.)
output.png
 
We got a few good experienced guys as every club does, but on the whole that group is mediocre.

Can't really win games consistently with a relatively low quality group of experienced guys, and a thin and injured group of midrange guys.

What's really disappointing is experienced people like Jones ,who performed worse than the likes of Garcia and Hastie.
Then, tactically, Boyd was way better than Campbell, but not as good as Marshall in the ruck, and Marshall was useless in as a forward.
 
Our team and how it performs will be all on potential - we do have the usual more experienced players that we know there capabilities like Wilkie , Marshall , Sinclair , Steele , Hill and by the way all of these guys played today and apart from Wilkie no of them showed up today.

Any we have been waiting for this year to commence and hoping our young stars with potential start winning us games -

King / has the talent to be anything but has been restricted due to injury.

Henry / is a player who gives us as they say Xfactor that most other teams have , once back in we will be far more dangerous in the forward line.

Owens / Maybe our best contested player in the team - if he fills his potential he could end up being our best player.

Phillipou / this is the kid who showed in a few games last year after playing in the 2s he will be better than most of our midfielders we currently run with.

Sharman / a true forward who can take a mark and is a o'k kick - the sort of guy we need not having Membrey now.

These are the future of the club and if they perform this year we will win more than we lose - of course guys like Howard and Butler will give us more than what there replacements showed today - but it is time to move past Camanitti as a key forward , you need to have a creative big mobile guy who can create and I hate to say it but he will never be that guy , I'd rather give Keller a run due to his natural ability , just seems the indigenous guys have it.
I would not right Hammer off because he could very well be our best option down back ahead of Cordy who at best is the 3rd defender in a backline and really he shouldn't be getting a game again due to he has shown everyone he is not very good.

The game plan of playing Marshall more forward this year is way off the mark - he is our best midfielder and should be played there - way off his best today as well as Sinclair / hopefully they get game fitness and lift us from what we saw today.

Hill needs to play as a true wingman and if he doesn't get into the game he needs to be dropped / we need to stop giving him excuses.

Anyway this is the team I would be running with this year when everyone is available.

Byrne (needs to become Websters replacement)or blood who has the ability to do it.
Howard (our best defensive tall)
Schoemaker (our best 3rd tall option)

Sinclair and Nas our strongest players in the halfback line
Wilkie will take the most dangerous forward.

Wood - does the job on a wing / not great today but as we know he can help out our undermanned defensive with his elite 2 way running.

Macrae is likely going to be our best midfielder so I'd keep him as our mainstay in the middle.

Hill on the other wing and if he is useless again replace with Wilson who could already of taken Hill spot.

Byrne - Howard - Schoemaker
Sinclair - Wilkie - Nas
Wood - Macrae - Wilson
Butler - Owens - Henry
Higgins - King - Sharman

Marshall / Phillipou / Steele

Hastie - Boxshall - Tauru - Windhager - Travaglia

and if Marshall needs a break , it's time for King to take up some slack.

Hill plays if he shows something same as Webster but we need to be looking at getting some of these kids filling these roles.

Time to pension off Jones , Cordy and if we need a tall forward use Keller - time to get him in the team to see what he can offer and Hammer needs to become a defender or his time at the club is limited.
Schoenmaker has shown nothing to suggest he's best 22. He can kick but he's a complete liability defensively right now (it's okay he's a second year player). I'd be playing Caminiti or Tauru (when healthy) ahead of him due to their athletic traits and aerial ability which we sorely lack without Battle. Even Cordy's probably better option

Don't mind Byrnes down back but keep Webster in ahead of Hastie.
 
Schoenmaker has shown nothing to suggest he's best 22. He can kick but he's a complete liability defensively right now (it's okay he's a second year player). I'd be playing Caminiti or Tauru (when healthy) ahead of him due to their athletic traits and aerial ability which we sorely lack without Battle. Even Cordy's probably better option

Don't mind Byrnes down back but keep Webster in ahead of Hastie.
There is a stat, contested defensive one on ones.
In that game, Shoey, O'Brian , Nick Murray, and Cordy scored 2.
No-one else scored more than one.
Not sure what it means.
 
Our team and how it performs will be all on potential - we do have the usual more experienced players that we know there capabilities like Wilkie , Marshall , Sinclair , Steele , Hill and by the way all of these guys played today and apart from Wilkie no of them showed up today.

Any we have been waiting for this year to commence and hoping our young stars with potential start winning us games -

King / has the talent to be anything but has been restricted due to injury.

Henry / is a player who gives us as they say Xfactor that most other teams have , once back in we will be far more dangerous in the forward line.

Owens / Maybe our best contested player in the team - if he fills his potential he could end up being our best player.

Phillipou / this is the kid who showed in a few games last year after playing in the 2s he will be better than most of our midfielders we currently run with.

Sharman / a true forward who can take a mark and is a o'k kick - the sort of guy we need not having Membrey now.

These are the future of the club and if they perform this year we will win more than we lose - of course guys like Howard and Butler will give us more than what there replacements showed today - but it is time to move past Camanitti as a key forward , you need to have a creative big mobile guy who can create and I hate to say it but he will never be that guy , I'd rather give Keller a run due to his natural ability , just seems the indigenous guys have it.
I would not right Hammer off because he could very well be our best option down back ahead of Cordy who at best is the 3rd defender in a backline and really he shouldn't be getting a game again due to he has shown everyone he is not very good.

The game plan of playing Marshall more forward this year is way off the mark - he is our best midfielder and should be played there - way off his best today as well as Sinclair / hopefully they get game fitness and lift us from what we saw today.

Hill needs to play as a true wingman and if he doesn't get into the game he needs to be dropped / we need to stop giving him excuses.

Anyway this is the team I would be running with this year when everyone is available.

Byrne (needs to become Websters replacement)or blood who has the ability to do it.
Howard (our best defensive tall)
Schoemaker (our best 3rd tall option)

Sinclair and Nas our strongest players in the halfback line
Wilkie will take the most dangerous forward.

Wood - does the job on a wing / not great today but as we know he can help out our undermanned defensive with his elite 2 way running.

Macrae is likely going to be our best midfielder so I'd keep him as our mainstay in the middle.

Hill on the other wing and if he is useless again replace with Wilson who could already of taken Hill spot.

Byrne - Howard - Schoemaker
Sinclair - Wilkie - Nas
Wood - Macrae - Wilson
Butler - Owens - Henry
Higgins - King - Sharman

Marshall / Phillipou / Steele

Hastie - Boxshall - Tauru - Windhager - Travaglia

and if Marshall needs a break , it's time for King to take up some slack.

Hill plays if he shows something same as Webster but we need to be looking at getting some of these kids filling these roles.

Time to pension off Jones , Cordy and if we need a tall forward use Keller - time to get him in the team to see what he can offer and Hammer needs to become a defender or his time at the club is limited.
I think Byrnes is too short to be a genuine lockdown medium defender. You look across the competition at all the lockdowns; Webster 188cm, Starcevich 187cm, Archer 185cm, Maynard 189cm, even Paton is 186cm. Ronnie is 181cm

Fine as a 7th defender to take the 2nd best small but you want these types of players to also be able to impact in the air, not just lock a player away

Hastie is the main candidate for now imo
 
There is a stat, contested defensive one on ones.
In that game, Shoey, O'Brian , Nick Murray, and Cordy scored 2.
No-one else scored more than one.
Not sure what it means.
It just means when the opposition delivers the ball to a player's man and they have to contest 1v1. Nothing to do with success rate, just the raw number of times that player is involved defensively
 
This.

Saints have loads of kids- 3 debutants yesterday and 3 with under 10 games. Plus others like Nas, Windy, etc who are still fairly young.

We also have loads of experienced guys - Wilkie, Marshall, Steele, Jones, Cordy, Hill, Wood, Webster, Macrae etc.

We probably have more 28+ than most teams. But also, more kids

The list management decisions of the last decade are haunting us- traded first round draft picks in 2015 and 2019 for guys no longer at the club (Carlisle) or in the twilight (Hill). Other top picks didn't work out for various reasons (Clark, Coffield). Hence we lack 23-27 year olds right now.

So we're left with a list without clear direction. A mish mash of youth and experience. I'm genuinely excited about our young group- especially Nas, King, Pou and Wilson. 4 potential stars there. But as they mature Sinclair, Wood, Hill, Steele will decline in coming years.

I'm worried we'll spend the next decade where we spent the last decade- right in the middle. Between 9th and 12th majority of the time. Occasional finals appearance or bottom 4 in a particularly good or bad year.
It's a good point, and I'm not sure if we can contend while those senior guys are still around - the reality is probably not. We'd need the kids to come on pretty quickly and those guys to extend their prime years into their 30s. But there's a reason we resigned Hilly and Wood for 2-3 years, they are invaluable off the field. Wilkie, Steele, Marshall, Sinclair are champions of the club (none of whom were star recruits).

We have a huge wave of talented kids coming through which we may well add to again this offseason, we need these senior guys to drive the standards and show them the way, and hopefully they'll be rewarded with some late career success.
 
On the weekend effort, I totally agree on Jones.
I would cut Clark some slack though, subbed in after the game totally shot and we were getting absolutely mauled in the mids.
Don't know if it was him per se or a better balance but we evened up the clearances a bit when he came on and stopped them just walking it out of the middle. Wasn't impressive but not totally invisible like Jones.

On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app
Agree
Clark hate has me stumped a bit ….he has smarts was rusty but he is one player who will be better for the run now needs continuity
Jones is cooked - clogger should be vfl
 
This.

Saints have loads of kids- 3 debutants yesterday and 3 with under 10 games. Plus others like Nas, Windy, etc who are still fairly young.

We also have loads of experienced guys - Wilkie, Marshall, Steele, Jones, Cordy, Hill, Wood, Webster, Macrae etc.

We probably have more 28+ than most teams. But also, more kids

The list management decisions of the last decade are haunting us- traded first round draft picks in 2015 and 2019 for guys no longer at the club (Carlisle) or in the twilight (Hill). Other top picks didn't work out for various reasons (Clark, Coffield). Hence we lack 23-27 year olds right now.

So we're left with a list without clear direction. A mish mash of youth and experience. I'm genuinely excited about our young group- especially Nas, King, Pou and Wilson. 4 potential stars there. But as they mature Sinclair, Wood, Hill, Steele will decline in coming years.

I'm worried we'll spend the next decade where we spent the last decade- right in the middle. Between 9th and 12th majority of the time. Occasional finals appearance or bottom 4 in a particularly good or bad year.
Really need to land 2-3 of LDU, TDK, SDK, Ben King or another high-profile player and a couple of role players in that age bracket over the next couple of years
 
We are a bottom 6 team and are playing like one.
We were 13th for the majority of the season untill a kick with 60 seconds to go in 2024 moved to 11th by orientate only.
With the natural improvement of Melbourne, Gold Coast and Adelaide we are a bottom 4 team and we are playing like one.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Really need to land 2-3 of LDU, TDK, SDK, Ben King or another high-profile player and a couple of role players in that age bracket over the next couple of years

I won't be greedy LDU & TDK would be a sensational start. Even Ed Richards would be worth pursuing, he is very underrated outside the Dogs.
 
I actually do, I know if my sons were budding AFL footballers St Kilda would be the last club I'd want them at. Why should we pass our life inflictions onto our children.

The odds are they will spend their entire career in a state of flux, without ever seriously contending. They won't have the off field and after playing opportunities many other clubs present.

Plus there are very strong odds they will never be known as a premiership player. But hey they played for St Kilda....Battle & Membrey made exactly the right move.

I lived out my childhood dreams playing in multiple GF winning sides, first and foremost that's what you play for.
My daughter accuses me of "child abuse" for making her grow up a Saints supporter.
 
Because the club needs money and support from its members to get ourselves out of this shit show in the long term. If you’re going to pot them for trying to get ahead then don’t complain when we’re still stuck in the same position in 10 years time.

And also they know we won't be in a better position next week - or potentially for the next month or two - so may as well do what they can now
 
I won't be greedy LDU & TDK would be a sensational start. Even Ed Richards would be worth pursuing, he is very underrated outside the Dogs.
I’ve wanted Richards since last year but seems like he’ll definitely re-sign

If we get TDK then stavro has indicated that it’d give us a good shot at SDK too so we’ll see how that plays out
 
We don't win a final without Hannebery. Worth every cent.
Four years at big coin and 18 games out of a possible 90 was worth winning one final? I don't think so. What contribution did that make to the development of the list and the club? And in the context of how our club gone since then, what does winning one final mean? A complete disaster was his recruitment. As others have noted, we are still paying for the Richo, Lethlean, Trout, Ratten years.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Autopsy Crows hammer Saints by 63 in round 1


Write your reply...

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top